Topic: 24/192?

[scb]

i'm listening to this abb 3-19 show in 24/192 now off the dvd-a discs i burned.   i've never heard 24/192 before so i'm not really sure what to expect from it

what are people's thoughts of 24/192?

[leegeddy]

i'm listening to this abb 3-19 show in 24/192 now off the dvd-a discs i burned.   i've never heard 24/192 before so i'm not really sure what to expect from it

what are people's thoughts of 24/192?

scott;
i have few commercial dvd-a at 24/192 from analog recordings.  few words come to mind to describe 24/192k are: detail, super smooth, lovely decay in cymbals, soundstage depth/transparency, dynamic and gorgeous.

marc

[scb]

i do have to say that this monster liz reed jam has a ton going on, yet the separation of instruments is still very there

[BobW]

i do have to say that this monster liz reed jam has a ton going on, yet the separation of instruments is still very there

You "inexperienced" guys don't know what to listen for....b&p me a dub.....please....     

Just FYI, some D/As in the DVD-A players will resolve the 192 as if it were 96 for some reason.
Many will not digi-out 192 over S/PDIF.  I'm not sure if the standard allows it, I got to look it up again.
I think the manufacturers have extended the standard as chips capabilities have allowed.

Anyhow, listen to the ring-out and sizzle in the cymbals, transient sounds like bowing and plucking and piano/drum attack, and for a sense of spatial placement.  It can get very arty when you get past 24/48.  The nearly 99% of your cognitive hearing ability will fit in 16/44.1.  A lot less if there is any ambient noise.
The improvement is most definitely there, but conditions must be right and you must concentrate to hear it.