Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?  (Read 4928 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« on: December 31, 2014, 05:22:15 PM »
I am running into an issue where venues now have digital boards, and thus my patch must be digi-ready. Yet to sync with my mic rig (listed in my signature), I need an analog signal, like a 2x xlr or rca, since my recorder will not accept two digital inputs...

Preferably I want a device that accepts aes and spidf inputs since I will likely come across both eventually...

So I guess either I get a new recorder that will accept different digital inputs, or I find a dac to use in the field (changing my mic rig is out of the question). I would assume getting a new dac would be cheaper than getting a new recorder, but truthfully I don't really know what is out there...

This, I am starting this thread to ask for input on options that are available to me...

Thanks, in advance, for any and all insight, input and advice.
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline Life In Rewind

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 883
    • www.rovingsign.com
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2014, 05:52:10 PM »
Digital boards will have analog outs - if you're determined to keep the ad2k in the rig (assuming that connects digitally) - just use those.

Take a super close look at the boards and see what your dealing with - there a lots of variations.

Offline Ultfris101

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 764
  • Gender: Male
  • Spoon!!!
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2014, 06:02:51 PM »
Seems like a great reason to get a 744t and drop the ad2k and r-44...
Mics: Schoeps MK5,MK41 CMC6,KCY,KC5 | AKG ck63,ck1 C460B,C480B | DPA 4061 | Naiant X-R card,hyper | CA-14o,c
Pres: Sound Devices USBPre2 | Naiant Tinybox | Church Audio 9200, UBB
Recs: Zoom F8 | Edirol R-44 | Sony PCM-M10 | Tascam DR-2d
Video: Sony CX550(2), CX580, HX9

LMA: http://archive.org/bookmarks/ultfris101

Offline pohaku

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • *
  • Posts: 1091
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2014, 11:37:01 PM »
Or you could get the refurbed DR-680 in the Retail section for $300.  You would have both analog and digital ins.  A relatively inexpensive solution.
Mics: akg c460 (ck61, ck63), c414buls, c568eb; at4049a, 4051a, 4053a, at853; josephson c42; neumann U87, km84i; beyer m130, m160, m500; aea r84; gefell m71, mt711s, m200, m201, um70S; sony c38; schoeps cmc6, CMBI (mk4, mk21, mk41, mk4v); sennheiser mkh30, mkh40, md421, md431, md541; audix m1290
Pres: API, a-designs, pendulum, purple, millennia TD-1 and HV-32P, gt, littlebox, tinybox, usbpre2, CA 9200, pipsqueak, grace V2, DAV BG1
Cables: KCY, CMR, Naiant AKG actives, PFAs, asst.  GAKables and Darktrain
Recorders/converters/monitors: dr680, m10, dr-2d, d50, zoom f8 & F8n pro, 788T SSD CL-8, lynx aurora 8, Neumann KH20


Yeah, I'm an attorney, but everyone needs a day job

Offline yltfan

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2571
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2015, 11:17:54 PM »
The digital boards I have been seeing lately do not have spidf output, so the dr-680 doesn't work.
Mics: AT4051, AT4053, KM140, AKG C414, Beyerdynamic MEM86 guns, Nak cm300, AT853 4.7mod
Pre: V3, CA-9100
Recorders: Busman DR-680, iRivers, minidisc, jb3, and DAT

Dime torrents: http://www.dimeadozen.org/account-details.php?id=88009

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2015, 08:16:37 AM »
The digital boards I have been seeing lately do not have spidf output, so the dr-680 doesn't work.
Do they have AES? What about an AES to coax cable made by Ted or Digi gal?
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2015, 01:37:53 PM »
Thank you very much for the input...

The digital boards I have seen output aes, but yes, one of those aes > spidf cables will solve that issue...

So, a new recorder would Do what I need; I guess both the 680 and the 744 can take two different digital sources...

Are there any small DACs that would work..? One reason I am interested in the DAC route is that I won't be hamstrung by whatever the output word length/sample rate is from the board. I am also hoping the DAC route would be cheaper than buying a new recorder...

Anyway, thanks again. I appreciate all the input greatly.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2015, 01:40:13 PM by macdaddy »
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline hi and lo

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2294
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2015, 02:21:07 PM »

So, a new recorder would Do what I need; I guess both the 680 and the 744 can take two different digital sources...


They can, however the 680 can sometimes be picky about syncing to the digital input. My observation was that it would sync more reliably to an AES than SPDIF signal.

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2015, 04:56:19 PM »
Thank you very much for the input...

The digital boards I have seen output aes, but yes, one of those aes > spidf cables will solve that issue...

So, a new recorder would Do what I need; I guess both the 680 and the 744 can take two different digital sources...

Are there any small DACs that would work..? One reason I am interested in the DAC route is that I won't be hamstrung by whatever the output word length/sample rate is from the board. I am also hoping the DAC route would be cheaper than buying a new recorder...

Anyway, thanks again. I appreciate all the input greatly.
You may be able to go with a small stand alone DAC but it will require a way to power it in the field, I don't know of anything off the top of my head that would work but maybe something exists in the headphone world since they take their portable playback rather seriously. Unfortunately there seems to be no small stand alone "quality" ADC's for field use besides the Sound Devices Mixpre-D & USBPre 2 which are both higher than purchasing a new deck. Both of those are preamps first & foremost with the great Sound Devices ADC built in. The USBPre also works as a standalone DAC for computer playback which is nice & may work for you in your application plus help justify the cost during playback?
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline jbell

  • TDS
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4567
  • Gender: Male
  • Spreadicated
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2015, 05:20:25 PM »
Audioroot Upre mkII has AES and is tiny!
Mics: DPA ST4011ER & 4018ER
Preamps: DPA MMA 6000 | Audioroot Femto
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre-10 II | Sony PCM A10

-20        -12         -6        TDS   (32/48)     
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][}   
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][} 
__________________________
|Record|  Runtime: 4:19.99  {|||] 75%

Offline Life In Rewind

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 883
    • www.rovingsign.com
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2015, 07:39:13 PM »
Its a mixed field...YMMV

We have the popular Behringer X32 at work - and it only has AES - which I believe defaults to L/R outputs. (as long as nobody has changed the routing)

There are mixers like the A&H ZEDs that have USB - that carries L/R mix also. Not really a digital mixer - but an analog mixer with a digital (USB) output.

I'd imagine SPDIF/RCA is about the rarest.


Offline MattH

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 450
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2015, 06:50:49 PM »

So, a new recorder would Do what I need; I guess both the 680 and the 744 can take two different digital sources...


They can, however the 680 can sometimes be picky about syncing to the digital input. My observation was that it would sync more reliably to an AES than SPDIF signal.

I have found that my DR-680 will accept some digi-board AES outs but not others.  No special cable needed. Some digi-boards operate at 48kHz and others at 96kHz. Very important to have the mix correctly routed and to know the sample rate. Some sound engineers seem to have problems changing the routings correctly even when they are willing to do it. Same can be true in trying to connect to the spare assignable analog outs. YMMV
mics: Soundfield ST450, JW mod Milab VIP-50's, Milab VM-44 Links (Matched Cards, Matched S-Cards), BR mod Nak 700's
pre's: Audio Developments AD 066(11), V2, Littlebox, Tinybox, Reutelhuber
recorders: Sonosax SX-R4, Tascam DR-680, Korg MR-1, Tascam DR-2, Mackie DL32R
playback: Teac UD-501 DAC > Meyer Sound

Online mepaca

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • taperssection member
Re: DAC for field recording... Or a new recorder..?
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2015, 09:03:59 AM »
Sound Devices Mixpre D

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.108 seconds with 42 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF