Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic  (Read 2956 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 6079

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 277
Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« on: September 30, 2007, 06:49:15 AM »
Hello.
In my limited taping experience I have used the R 09 and thought the internal mics were pretty damn good for what they were.

In an effort to understand the quality hierarchy of microphones, and because the next mic I want to use is a mono shotgun mic (Sony PD 170 camcorder http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/sony-dsr-pd170-camcorder-review.htm ) I wanted to ask if you folks had any immediate thoughts comparing the two mics quality, or strengths and weaknesses in relation to each other.
Free Screenings of "Bill Hicks: Revelations" in Portland and Seattle
May 27th & 28th.
info: http://www.BillHicks.org  RSVP: http://Facebook.com/BillHicksNW

Offline BayTaynt3d

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1816
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from San Francisco
    • BayTaper.com
Re: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2007, 11:45:15 AM »
Well, in general, the built-in mics on any recorder suck compared to using some real mics, and this includes the R9. LOL.
BayTaper.com | One Man’s Multimedia Journey Through the San Francisco Jazz & Creative Music Scene

Offline bhakti

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 135
Re: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2007, 03:41:48 AM »
yep... but how good are the Edirol internal mics? I've heard loads of people rage to them... maybe the shotgun isn't actually as good?  ???

Offline echo1434

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 135
Re: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2007, 05:19:04 AM »
yep... but how good are the Edirol internal mics?

They're not that good. I mean, they're fine for voice recording and other medium-volume general purpose stuff, but don't expect any hi-fi recordings from them. They're also fairly noisy.

I love my Edirol to death, but I couldn't even imagine using the built-in mics in a concert situation.

Offline 6079

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 277
Re: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2007, 08:54:53 AM »
Here's a sample of a Modest Mouse song I taped with the internal mic in an outdoor venue, about 12 yards from center stage:
http://www.uploadhut.com/id39501/Modest Mouse Edirol sample.wav
(just copy the whole line, spaces included)

It didn't handle the bass very well:  I took some of the low end out; way too strong.

Does this sample fit with your opinion of the internal mics?
« Last Edit: October 01, 2007, 09:32:04 AM by 6079 »
Free Screenings of "Bill Hicks: Revelations" in Portland and Seattle
May 27th & 28th.
info: http://www.BillHicks.org  RSVP: http://Facebook.com/BillHicksNW

Offline BayTaynt3d

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1816
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from San Francisco
    • BayTaper.com
Re: Edirol R-09 mic vs shotgun mic
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2007, 10:40:28 AM »
yep... but how good are the Edirol internal mics? I've heard loads of people rage to them... maybe the shotgun isn't actually as good?  ???


What I mean is, they're OK, but they sure can't compete with a real set of phantom-powered condensers, heh. And regarding the shotgun, not sure what you are trying to accomplish, but shotguns typically aren't you're best choice for music recording if that's what you want to do. But, if you're looking for something to slap on top of your PD170 for everyday use, then yeah, that's a good idea, but for music, not so good.
BayTaper.com | One Man’s Multimedia Journey Through the San Francisco Jazz & Creative Music Scene

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF