Topic: ADK TL's >V3 or V2>?? or ......

[Kindguy]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

[BC]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

Just curious, any problem using the AD2k+ with a fixed gain pre like the 148?
BC

[Kindguy]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

Just curious, any problem using the AD2k+ with a fixed gain pre like the 148?
BC

I hope not. I have not run it yet.

[Kindguy]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

Just curious, any problem using the AD2k+ with a fixed gain pre like the 148?
BC

Yes it is a problem. it's not going to work.

[plucks]

I run V2 ->sonic ad2k (aka benchmark 2402) and I love it. I would like an all-in-one box but I love the ad2k - so I lug it around. It is no longer made but this is coming out soon and it looks really neat.

http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/adc1/

this looks to be a non-portable AD box.  the DAC1 that benchmark makes is sick

[plucks]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

Just curious, any problem using the AD2k+ with a fixed gain pre like the 148?
BC

I hope not. I have not run it yet.

that will most definitely be trickey to run with a fixed gain pre-amp...

[Kyle]

I run V2 ->sonic ad2k (aka benchmark 2402) and I love it. I would like an all-in-one box but I love the ad2k - so I lug it around. It is no longer made but this is coming out soon and it looks really neat.

http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/adc1/

this looks to be a non-portable AD box.  the DAC1 that benchmark makes is sick

It is half-rack sized, so it should be portable. somewhere around the size of the ad2k. The rack ears make it a bit wider.

[Craig T]

I ran TL's>V3 for around 2 months. I just didn't like something about it. But to give it a fair chance most of those recordings were in large venues in the TS.

I just picked up a AD2K for 350.00 at a local studio. I'm stoked. Can't wait to run this. Now all I need is a 24 bit recorder. 

Just curious, any problem using the AD2k+ with a fixed gain pre like the 148?
BC

I know someone who had problems running the fixed gain N-Box with an AD2K.

[Brian]

i've ran both tl>v3 and tl>v2>modsbm1 and i prefered tl>v2>modsbm1 without a doubt in my mind.

[creekfreak]

I have only run my TL's with my V3, but could imagine them sounding damn good with the V2/modsbm-1 combo, but then again, I find my TL V3 recordings to be full of bass and would think the modsbm-1 would make that almost too phat...but I have no point of reference.

[Brian]

I have only run my TL's with my V3, but could imagine them sounding damn good with the V2/modsbm-1 combo, but then again, I find my TL V3 recordings to be full of bass and would think the modsbm-1 would make that almost too phat...but I have no point of reference.

i did run hpf 2 frequenty with the v2>modsbm1 setup.  not much at all with the V3.  still sounded better to me.  really nice and fat sounding.

[Nick Graham]

Kinda late on this thread, but I'd definitely recommend V2>(mod)SBM1. I ran both, and definitely preferred that combo.

I've got a Dickey Betts show I taped with that rig (1st set cards/2nd set hypers), PM me if you wanna check it out.

[creekfreak]

I have only run my TL's with my V3, but could imagine them sounding damn good with the V2/modsbm-1 combo, but then again, I find my TL V3 recordings to be full of bass and would think the modsbm-1 would make that almost too phat...but I have no point of reference.

i did run hpf 2 frequenty with the v2>modsbm1 setup.  not much at all with the V3.  still sounded better to me.  really nice and fat sounding.

that would make sense, but I am not a fan of running hpf2 or hpf1 unless I really have to, and if the combo I am running forces that issue all the time, then I would feel that is not the best combo, but that is just me...I use to love that combo with my MBHO's

[michael]

could i still get the mod oade does for the sbm???

[Tim]

I don't think that doug is still doing the mods, though I would call just to be sue

if he's not PM Todd R on this board, he does similiar mods to what Doug does