Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: optimizing wavelab for 24 bit  (Read 17101 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« on: September 17, 2003, 10:27:08 AM »
what settings are people using to record wavelab at 24bit (i'll be doing 24/96, but 24/48 should applly).  

In the preferences dialog, what are the buffers set at?  cache?

i set it to 24bit temp files, is this correct?

in the record dialog, i chose auto-split and then set it to 1800MB, good?

also, in windows, i've set one setting to optimize windows for background processes as opposed to programs, is this correct?  there is another setting underneath that, which i can't remember the choice, what should that be set to?

any suggestions appreciated and i think this would be a candidate for the archive.

Offline Wes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
  • Gender: Male
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2003, 01:50:06 PM »
you got it all right damon, you could increase you file size on the auto split up to 1999, but 1800 is fine too.  I just used the default buffer setting and cache.  i don't know if this is "the best" settting, but, i can say that i recorded around 100 or so hours with no problems.

Wes
" Radio Shack md440zrs>high pass filter>whopper a>d "

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2003, 03:03:53 PM »
"also, in windows, i've set one setting to optimize windows for background processes as opposed to programs, is this correct? "

NO, you want it optimized for programs!

the setting below that is for page files...you can leave that at default


the water's clean and innocent

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2003, 03:10:42 PM »
really?  i could've sworn a ton of people on this board have said to set it for background processes...

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2003, 03:12:38 PM »
Wavelab and all sound recording apps are programs, not background processes. recording is NOT a background process.

what Windows is referring to with regards to "background processes" is internal services like Messenger, rundll, IIS, etc...


the water's clean and innocent

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2003, 03:30:20 PM »
i understand that wavelab itself is a program, but is the recording of music through the pcmcia card using various drivers a background process?  i've seen numerous posts from people who have set their laptop up for taping for background processes over apps.  not trying to be difficult, just trying to figure this out.

thanks for all the info +t

Offline twoodruff

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4687
  • Gender: Male
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2003, 03:48:36 PM »
i can help you guys out much better if ya get me a copy of wavelab
No Mics
Clamps
Cables
No Preamp
Recorders

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2003, 03:57:51 PM »
you have a server smartass?

Offline twoodruff

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4687
  • Gender: Male
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2003, 04:10:04 PM »
working on it
No Mics
Clamps
Cables
No Preamp
Recorders

Tim

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2003, 04:21:37 PM »
working on it

I got mine sent to me over AIM by a certain guy in Iowa who makes shitty tapes...

I can aim you mine...

my aim is u89taper  :P

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2003, 04:28:26 PM »

Offline twoodruff

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4687
  • Gender: Male
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2003, 04:30:53 PM »
hey I'm u89m148






jk
No Mics
Clamps
Cables
No Preamp
Recorders

Tim

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2003, 04:41:05 PM »
rotflmao  

you two crack me up....

Offline mirth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2508
  • Gender: Male
  • Les Hommes Savvent Pourquois
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2003, 06:09:37 PM »
BACKGROUND PROCESSES! I know it sounds bass-ackwards but it is the correct setting.
Governor Jim McGreevey was equally disturbed about the upcoming population increase. "New Jersey cannot support all of these wookies," he said. "For starters, we don't have nearly enough kindbud. At best, we can muster up a Q.P. of some beasties, but we've not a dime-bag more."

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:optimizing wavelab for 24 bit
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2003, 06:11:00 PM »
thanks, mirth, can you please explain why?  thanks.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF