Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)  (Read 16069 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2014, 10:34:05 AM »
"The streaming playback function is intended for checking audio that has already been recorded. "  Playback, not monitoring.

Offline yltfan

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2572
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2014, 04:32:12 PM »
"The streaming playback function is intended for checking audio that has already been recorded. "  Playback, not monitoring.

Bummer. But I'm still exciting about remote start/stop, levels, etc.
Mics: AT4051, AT4053, KM140, AKG C414, Beyerdynamic MEM86 guns, Nak cm300, AT853 4.7mod
Pre: V3, CA-9100
Recorders: Busman DR-680, iRivers, minidisc, jb3, and DAT

Dime torrents: http://www.dimeadozen.org/account-details.php?id=88009

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2014, 08:13:56 PM »
Then again, why do they say "Plug headphones into your smartphone and listen to a near-realtime feed from the recorder" - if it's just playback, why mention "near-realtime"?  Odd.  Still, in a great many recording situations, I find the only real way to check the sound is via a quick playback when that's convenient, as even with well isolated headphones, it's hard to get the real picture if you are monitoring during recording anywhere near the sound source.

Looking a few years ahead, I would have thought there would be no technical reason why a number of such recorders could not be synced together with some kind of wifi clocking, so you could make a multitrack recording of a band without needing any mic cables or central recorder.

By the way - you can remote monitor a recording device via a bluetooth link up to about 150 feet using the devices described in this post -

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=2316113

The transmitter runs on usb power so it would not be hard to use a small battery pack for that. 

Using such a link you could even use one recorder just as a mic and record at a distance on another one.  People rubbish bluetooth sound, but with good quality gear at each end it's actually no disaster imho.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2014, 08:22:48 PM by Ozpeter »

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Gender: Male
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2014, 11:33:04 PM »
This is nothing new! The only thing new is the fact it is in a "disposable" recorder like this trashcan - the sound devices 788 introduced these features over 5 years ago and there have been wifi enabled tablet based controls for sound boards for over 10 years
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2014, 07:07:47 AM »
Quote
That technology is called FM radio; you may need a longer antenna but the quality is far superior to Bluetooth.
I suspect you'd quickly get into licencing issues trying to use FM.  And if FM was any good, they wouldn't have invented digital radio, would they?  :)

Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4115
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2014, 08:20:19 AM »
Quote
That technology is called FM radio; you may need a longer antenna but the quality is far superior to Bluetooth.
I suspect you'd quickly get into licencing issues trying to use FM.  And if FM was any good, they wouldn't have invented digital radio, would they?  :)

Jon - you were talking about FM as a short-distance transmission method, not comparing to broadcast FM radio, yes? 

I don't know about digital radio being much better than FM (I had a frustrating experience with Sirius several years ago), but Bluetooth audio can sound very good if you're using the A2DP or AptX codecs.  I use AptX to stream from my phone to my car system, and the compression scheme is good enough that I don't hear its effects - really I don't hear any difference between that and using a wired connection.  I also suspect that the DAC in my car stereo may be superior to the one in my phone.  There's also AptX Lossless which will do up to 24/96 lossless streaming, but not many devices support it yet.
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.
- Gustav Mahler

Acoustic Recording Techniques
Team Classical
Team Line Audio
Team DPA

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15721
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2014, 12:33:31 PM »
wireless distributed Wordclock.

I've wondered for years about that.  Send transport control along too.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15721
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2014, 01:17:22 PM »
Understood. Wireless wordclock sync alone could be more simply implemented in external devices unspecific to the recorder, as long as the recorder has WC.  I could see that provided by a Naiant box.  I'd been thinking of it as manufacturer implemented and integrated within a particular family of recording devices.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #23 on: September 28, 2014, 10:51:35 AM »
Quote
People rubbish bluetooth sound, but with good quality gear at each end it's actually no disaster imho.

I suspect that I should back that up with some kind of test, which would be pretty easy using the rig I described.  Play a CD through the BT transmitter, record it from the BT receiver, and note the difference (subjectively and also check any restriction of frequency response, though of course there's more to it than that).  If I do it I'll start another thread as  it's completely OT here, oops!

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #24 on: October 05, 2014, 09:27:33 AM »
A thought occurs to me (for once) - given that every purchaser of these devices is highly likely to download the remote app, then we'll see the number downloaded on the app store sites which will give an interesting insight into how well these devices sell.

They've already sold at least one - I've pre-ordered.

DF81

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #25 on: October 05, 2014, 08:28:01 PM »
Digital input as well as mini analog would be great.

Tascam has shown the pay attention to feedback with the vast improvements of the DR-100 and DR-100 MK2.

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #26 on: October 05, 2014, 08:46:15 PM »
A thought occurs to me (for once) - given that every purchaser of these devices is highly likely to download the remote app, then we'll see the number downloaded on the app store sites which will give an interesting insight into how well these devices sell.

They've already sold at least one - I've pre-ordered.

What features made you order and how do you intend to use it?  I have the impression you already own several portable recorders.  Why this one, too?

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2014, 01:27:25 AM »
Quote
What features made you order and how do you intend to use it?  I have the impression you already own several portable recorders.  Why this one, too?

That sounds like the kind of question my wife asks!  I may not have made it clear that it's the DR-22 model I have ordered, by the way.

Well, the current stable is an R44, a M10, a D60, an ICD-SX750, an H2N, and an H2 (unless I'm forgetting something, and don't get me listing the MD recorders!).

I do plan to part with one or two of these. 

The R44 is a keeper, used for serious recording. 

I have a love-hate relationship with the M10 because of the poor stereo image from the built in mics. It's great in all other departments.   However the SX750 got damaged recently (hold switch broken) and that leaves me looking for something to plug my Edirol in-ear mics into - the M10 is the obvious candidate, but of course the DR-22 would do the job, though it's not so pocketable.  So there's a big questionmark over the M10 but it might survive the cull.

The D60 was purchased to go with a DSLR I use for video, but when it comes down to it, I'm not actually using the camera much these days, and the D60 hasn't actually been used in anger, so it's very likely to go (for a fraction of its purchase price - I bought it on release, the price subsequently dropped of course, and there's a new lower cost model about to be released).

The H2N was purchased because I like the idea of "a mic that records", which is what it looks like.  The H2 could produce surprisingly good results and I'd hoped that the H2N was going to be significantly better, but while its multi-capsule layout with MS capability suits my mic technique tastes very well, at the end of the day I'm not sure that it produces radically better results than the earlier model - but still, its larger display screen and simpler control scheme recommends it, and I'm happy to keep it in my fleet.  The H2 itself is too battered to be worth putting up for sale, and it can still come in handy for odd jobs (eg as a temporary and very effective input mic for my wife's Dragon Naturally Speaking when her headset died).

So, having said all that, why the DR-22?  Well, first and foremost the wifi control feature really seems to raise many totally new possibilities.  I like the idea of using a mic that records controlled from a distance, rather than having a mic-only in front of performers, tethered by a long wire to a remote recorder.  Safely routing mic cables is a tedious business, and any way to avoid that when circumstances are right is very welcome.  And there are some locations where there is simply no way to run a cable from where the recorder has to be, to where the mic has to be.  Also, one can do nature recording stuff like putting the recorder close (but not too close) to a birds nest or whatever, and then retiring to a respectful distance to record.

Of course if the sound of the DR-22 mics is dire, then the plan falls at the first fence, but I'm a born optimist.  Also, being a well-known critic of the M10 omni mics, the DR-22 cardioids will be nice to have in a broadly similar package.  (I'm trying to ignore the fact that I could use the H2N when it comes down to it).  And the up-to-date general feature set of the DR-22 provides some further attractions.  There's already a firmware update to provide metronome functions (not actually that interesting to me) and hopefully we will see further developments in due course.

And lastly, like most here - I like new stuff.  And if I sell the M10 and the D60, even cheaply, it'll be covered, and I'll be immune to questions from my wife, or my fellow forum members.  :)  No, seriously, it was a very good question and hopefully the long answer is of interest.

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #28 on: October 06, 2014, 02:18:37 PM »
thanks.   Your perspective appears similar to mine. 

 I just bought the DR60 when it hit $149.99 about a month ago with rebate, but too late to return it.  Now I'm wishing I had known about the DR22 WL before buying just for the ability to control levels without being tethered to cables that can be a trip hazard. 

Offline Ozpeter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
Re: TASCAM DR-44wl (Handheld recorder with iOS and Android control)
« Reply #29 on: October 14, 2014, 06:11:52 PM »
Looks like there's at least one DR-22 in the wild - in the comments on this site -

http://cheesycam.com/control-new-tascam-dr-22wl-dr-44wl-audio-recorders-over-wi-fi/


Quote
Has anyone been able to get the wifi playback to work? I can get DR-22 to connect to the iPhone app and can control it from there (levels aren’t very fluid, but ok). But no sound from the app when recording (near-realtime or otherwise) and the ‘Play’ button in the app actually makes the *recorder* play out of its tiny speaker rather than streaming any audio to the iPhone. Basically defeating the whole purpose.

Recorder is updated to 1.11 for main fw, 1.01 for wifi fw, DR Control app is latest 1.0.4.

I can send files from the recorder over to the iPhone app, but that’s of limited utility for me personally. I need *monitoring*.

I  suspect this is operator failure - the user hasn't turned off the speaker in the settings, and so it's dutifully using the speaker for playback.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF