Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind  (Read 4468 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« on: August 23, 2005, 06:49:45 PM »
Anyone tried the new Neutrik "XX" XLR connectors?   Any reason to like those over the standard ones that everyone uses?
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4901
  • Gender: Male
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2005, 09:55:25 PM »
You'll make Neutrik happy if you do. :P  Seriouisly, I haven't tried them, so maybe they are the bees knees.  But I'm betting it was mainly some minor changes to allow Neutrik to make a new patent.  The patent for the X series must have expired, since I've come across two other manufacturers making exact copies of the X series.  And I mean exactly the same, only difference is the missing neutrik logo.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2005, 10:09:23 PM »
from the product description.  looks like some minor upgrades for ease of soldering as well as housing upgrades...

"The next generation of the worldwide accepted standard. Female connector with cage type contacts, "solder stop" for ease soldering and additional ground contact for best contact integrity between chassis and cable connector. Male connector without locking "window"; more stringent housing. Rugged diecast shell in sleek and ergonomic design."

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2005, 10:21:31 PM »
Yeah, what the hell does 'without locking "window"' get you?  The photos on the Neutrik website show that, so how do these lock into place?  Why would one want an XLR that does not lock?  Seems like a bad choice for our application but it just didn't seem plausible to me that they would eliminate that basic feature from the connector.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline leegeddy

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
  • Gender: Male
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2005, 10:25:40 PM »
Yeah, what the hell does 'without locking "window"' get you?  The photos on the Neutrik website show that, so how do these lock into place?  Why would one want an XLR that does not lock?  Seems like a bad choice for our application but it just didn't seem plausible to me that they would eliminate that basic feature from the connector.

there is a machined out groove inside the shell that serves as a locking mechanism. you can see the groove in this photo.



marc
"I'm a taper, he's a taper. Wouldn't you like to be a taper too?"
"Mics? What mics? This is my hat."

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2005, 11:07:30 PM »
Marc, I think that one is the X-HD series.  The XX series connector looks like it has no way for the lock to retain the connector shell.



The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline leegeddy

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
  • Gender: Male
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2005, 11:35:34 PM »
Marc, I think that one is the X-HD series.  The XX series connector looks like it has no way for the lock to retain the connector shell.





yes, the photo i posted is the HD series, but i was using that as an example.  i'd bet that the new XX series has the same machined out groove for the locking mechanism.

marc
"I'm a taper, he's a taper. Wouldn't you like to be a taper too?"
"Mics? What mics? This is my hat."

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2005, 12:14:35 PM »
Not satisfied with the photo, I wrote to Neutrik and this is the response:

Quote
Dear Michael:

The male XX-series connector has a detent to accept the female latch and
does indeed lock.  The XX series is compatible with the rest of our XLR
products and other manufactures as well.

Thank you for your inquiry.

I can see that the detent would not be visible in that photo.

Maybe it's time to try something new.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline leegeddy

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
  • Gender: Male
Re: Neutrik "XX" vs the regular kind
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2005, 12:28:01 PM »
Not satisfied with the photo, I wrote to Neutrik and this is the response:

Quote
Dear Michael:

The male XX-series connector has a detent to accept the female latch and
does indeed lock.  The XX series is compatible with the rest of our XLR
products and other manufactures as well.

Thank you for your inquiry.

I can see that the detent would not be visible in that photo.

Maybe it's time to try something new.

nice!

marc
"I'm a taper, he's a taper. Wouldn't you like to be a taper too?"
"Mics? What mics? This is my hat."

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.066 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF