Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations  (Read 4262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« on: April 05, 2004, 05:16:39 PM »
hey now sport tapers...

I've got an observation that has formed a question.
I've set the internal jumpers in the V2 or V3 for Mid Side (vs. stereo) on a number of occasions for some recording projects.
As I understand it, this is supposed to do the matrixing internaly and output a stereo signal.

w/the jumpers set you end up with:

left = mid
right = side

adjusting the gain on the right is adding width (side information) and adding gain to the left brings more mid (front) info.
Typicaly, I'd set my level on the left and leave it be and then dial in the ammount of side volume I felt was the best mix for the given situation.

My observation is that when i've done this, I notice that the louder I turn the "width", the louder the right channel becomes and I end up with lopsided wav files (one side channel louder)
yet, when I monitor w/headphones while doing it, i can clearly hear the addition of side information when I turn the gain knob up.

Now, shouldn't this "side" information be distrubuted equaly over both channels if in fact the Grace unit is doing the M-S decoding internally? It just doesn't seem right when I look at the .wav files in software. One is always louder than the other, and this shouldnt be the case.

What am I missing here?

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2004, 05:26:54 PM »
are you sure your jumpers are set correctly.  joe shambro opened up his the other night.  i could see how only one could be in the wrong spot.

thanks for looking into this. i would like to run M/S soon without having to hassle with the post production work if i don't have to since i have a v2.

i'm currently also customizing my HPF's in the v2 as well. this pre rocks!

Brian
« Last Edit: April 05, 2004, 08:32:54 PM by S_TL-Taper »

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2004, 06:13:37 PM »
very positive about the correct jumper settings.
the manual has nice pictures.  I think the other ones that you can see right off have to do w/phantom settings and the -20db line level pad on the front end.

but i'm sure about which jumpers are which.

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2004, 02:50:46 PM »
Nick, are you switching both jumpers(1 set for each channel)?
I'm looking at the V2 manual, and there are 2 sets of jumpers you need to move for stereo vs m/s


the water's clean and innocent

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2004, 06:25:45 PM »
yes.
I followed the instructions to the T.  
I no longer have any Grace products, but when I did...i did plenty of M-S recording w/them.  Its not a big deal to set the jumpers.   I'm not trying to get all pissy, but let us just assume i did it correctly instead of all the 2nd guessing.  I can read a manual as well as the next guy!
:)
Try it out, you'll see what I mean about the way it works and distributes gain.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2004, 06:27:58 PM »
hey Nick,

Most engineers I know prefer to decode to stereo after the fact. That's really what M-S is all about - perfection in the stereo image via post production . Consider giving it a try, perhaps record your stereo for the test.

;) ;D
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2004, 07:29:15 PM »
yea yea ... I know

you can do it pretty effectively on the fly w/Etymotics.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2004, 07:30:54 PM »
I was just busting your balls, I got a kick out of that post over on oade, I just copied and pasted it here to taunt you.

I'm interested in hearing what you find out. I sure would like to start doing some M/S work but I'd prefer to do it in the field.
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2004, 08:34:30 PM »
bastard!
I knew it was the same post, but from someone else.
taunted me good, you did!

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2004, 12:08:29 AM »
What mics are you using?
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2004, 05:26:27 AM »
Nick, it doesn't really matter. I'm not letting you use my V3 :P
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2004, 07:05:36 AM »
You can keep it, HONKY!
I'll do it in post "like i'm supposed to"

for M-S recording in the past i've used the AKG c422 and the Soundfield ST-250

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2004, 11:43:54 PM »
for M-S recording in the past i've used the AKG c422 and the Soundfield ST-250

I've never tried m-s before but it's a card for the mid and figure-of-eight for the side, right?  I asked about the mics because I could see how using the wrong polar pattern for the side mic would cause that effect.  e.g. if the side capsule was set to card, increasing the side levels would be additive on one channel and subtractive on the other (creating a level difference).  Just a thought...you've obviously got the experience.
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2004, 01:33:57 AM »
having some fun with mic theory and algebra....
the mid card is (R+L)
the side figure of 8 is (R-L)

m-s decoding takes the side and feeds the straight signal to the right and the inverse signal to the left (the absolute polarity depends which way your figure of 8 is pointing).

Your two channels are:
card + fo8
card - fo8

(R+L) + (R-L) = 2R
(R+L) - (R-L) = 2L

And that's where the left and right come from.

If you were to swap the mid and side (i.e. plug the card into the side and the fo8 into the mid) then the m-s decoding process would do this:

fo8 + card
fo8 - card

(R-L) + (R+L) = 2R
(R-L) - (R+L) = -2L

2 catches:
First - the notion of +/- is really about phase.  A +1 and a -1 are the same 'loudness'.
Second - the above simple algebra assumes equal strength signal when in fact you use much less side.  If side was at 50%, you'd end up with:

1.5R / 0.5L = absolute signal level of 2.0
0.5R / -1.5L = absolute signal level of 1.0

That would explain why turning up the side channel causes the level difference between left and right.  It seems that the more you dial up the side, the more the left will drop.  

Nick - it might be worth swapping the mid / side into the preamp and seeing if you get even gain in both channels as you turn up the side.  That would prove it.

david (living in the world of theory)  ;)
« Last Edit: April 09, 2004, 01:35:26 AM by dklein »
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2004, 10:08:44 AM »
c'mon Nick - what's the scoop?  Inquiring minds want to know.

If that algebra above is correct, your left and right should also be out of phase.  If you sit in a proper listening spot with speakers and play with the balance control, you should hear more bass with only the left, or only the right.  Less bass when both speakers are running.
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2004, 07:00:23 AM »
unfortunately, i'll have to leave this up to someone else to try as i no longer have a Lunatec preamp to test this on.

I brought this up 6mo too late, i'm afraid.

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re:V2/3 M-S matrixing Questions and observations
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2004, 12:38:57 PM »
well i was going to run M/S for RW20C this upcoming weekend until I found out he does not allow stage taping anymore. i run tl>v2>modsbm1 and was eager to try out the M/S matrixing with the V2.

i have to find a a REALLY good jazz band that plays weekly around here so i can try this out.

Brian

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 45 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF