Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: DIN vs ORTF?  (Read 8972 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15734
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: DIN vs ORTF?
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2014, 03:26:32 PM »
I think that's about it.

I'm trying to get a better understanding of the why's, when's and how's.

These types of threads were a large part of I was looking for when I first started lurking around TS years ago.  I enjoy them, and tend to get even more long-winded than normal in attempting to clearly explain the basic relationships of the "why" part.  The more interesting and valuable approach for me has usually been trying to understand the "why" and setting up things based around those insights, rather than setting things up based on standard conventions.  Sometimes standard convention is appropriate and has become the standard for good reason, yet sometimes there may be better ways of doing things if you have a strong understanding of the basic “why” relationships and can figure out how to apply that appropriately. 

Acidjack summed up the "when" succinctly in his last post.  The "how" part simply translates to the application of whatever you take away from all this.

Hope that helps.  If you have questions I'll try to answer them the best I can. 
« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 03:45:50 PM by Gutbucket »
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline rjp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 432
  • Gender: Male
  • You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Re: DIN vs ORTF?
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2014, 10:07:40 PM »
Those stereo zoom things are useful theoretical guides but are not guides to recording amplified PA systems at rock concerts from a distance, FWIW. It's good to understand the concepts, though, so you can better understand what you are doing in practice.

On the other hand, if what you're recording is purely acoustic (e.g. an orchestra, an a cappella chorus, a string trio, etc.), they're a great place to start.
Mics: AKG Perception 170, Naiant X-X, Sound Professionals SP-TFB-2
Preamps: Naiant Littlebox
Recorders: Olympus LS-10
Interfaces: Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2

Offline lastubbe

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Gender: Male
  • Copper-dome Bodhi drip a silver kimono
    • Dead-Phish
Re: DIN vs ORTF?
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2014, 10:36:45 PM »
Recording rock and roll concerts open air off a PA in a decent room reasonably close to the sound source, IMO ORTF beats DIN 99% of the time.
DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2/EAA PSP-2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
http://dead-phish.com
http://twitter.com/lastubbe
@lastubbe

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: DIN vs ORTF?
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2014, 10:52:19 PM »
I use DIN for my mk4s MUCH MORE than I use ORTF. DIN is more focused and evenly balanced in most cases IMO. YMMV. I have the active bars, so I can easily run DINa/DIN/NOS/ORTF/WideORTF. I run mk4/DIN 99% of the time. And mk41/DINa 99% of the time. I can honestly say that I'm consistently happy running those configs. I run mk4/ORTF usually at stage-lip or onstage. This may sound weird, but when I had my MBHO's back in the day, I would run Hypers/NOS occassionally if I was pretty close and DFC. I need to try that with my mk41s. I bet it sounds good up close! Ive been meaning to run my mk4s/NOS too, but I keep my NOS bar in my mk41 bag for some reason :) I used to run my mk21s/NOS. That seemed to be the best config for the mk21s the few times I ran them!

It really just comes down to trying them out and finding what you like best ;)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline ButchAlmberg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 269
  • Gender: Male
Re: DIN vs ORTF?
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2015, 11:47:10 PM »
Thanks fellas. Some really good information here. Hope no one minds if I give it a bump.
Line Audio CM-3, CM-4, Lewitt
Sound Devices MixPre-6 II |  Tascam DR-70D

Team Line Audio

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF