Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks  (Read 5454 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DATPAT

  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • Gender: Male
  • Recovering Gear Slut
    • Mobiltracks-Mobile A/V Recording
Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« on: July 27, 2012, 02:18:28 PM »
Since i'm now hunting for a 552 mixer. I called SD devices to get some more info about the pre's in their units. I spoke with Casey I believe it was. He didn't seem to be their top guy but seemed to know the products. I asked him if the pre's in the 552 were the same as those in the 788 since they seemed to have the same foot print and i have heard that the 788 had different and better pre's than the 744 or 722. He said all of the mixers(and stand alone pre's) have the Lundahl Transforms and are the same pre's. He also mentioned that those in the deck were chip based and that all three decks had the same pre's. It's kind of amusing to hear that since several active tapers have been pawning their v3's and other pre's because the pre's in the 788 were so much better the the 44 or 22? So given this info my question is this do people like the pre's in the decks better than the pre's in the mixers? I believe both to be good although a little different flavor. Casey said he like's the pre's in the decks better because they are cleaner. I assume he means they are more transparent and based on the transformers in the mixer's i'd assume they have a little bottom end coloration? Any input would be great. Thanks.
Mic's(pairs) AKG (414's, 391's, Se-10's, )AT 853's, 4050's,BEYER MC 740,Gefell m300's, NEUMANN U89  i's, SKM-140 Set , TLM 170's, 102's, OKTAVA Mk-012 set,319's, SENNHEISER MKH-8050's, Sanken CMS-10, SOUNDFIELD SPS200,ST-250.PROJECTS LSD-2, & C1's,TELFUNKEN Ela 260 Field Set (H,C,O), Copper heads
Decks: Tascam Dr100Mk2,DR-680, HS-P82, Zoom F-8,Fostex LR-16, Mackie SDR 2496
Pre's- Onyx Satallite,  Niaint Littlebox W/OT, Apogee AD -1000, Mini -Me, CoopePSA1
 Video: JVC GV-LS2WE, panasonic FZ-1000
Playback: B& K and Adcom Power Amps and Martin Logan Electrostatic's and Tannoy nearfields
http://www.mobiltracks.net

Offline bryonsos

  • Omni addict
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2061
  • Gender: Male
  • If it's important, tell me to write it down.
    • LMA uploads
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2012, 02:59:47 PM »
When comparing my LB (transformerless) to the MixPre, same mics etc., I find the MixPre to be much more transparent.
Mics: 3 Zigma Chi HA-FX (COL-251, c, h, o-d, o-f) / Avenson STO-2 / Countryman B3s
Pres: CA-Ugly / Naiant Tinyhead / SD MixPre
Decks: Roland R-44 / Sony PCM-M10
GAKables
Dead Muppets

My recordings LMA / BT / TTD

Offline DigiGal

  • AES Associate Member
  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Gender: Female
  • Stay healthy and safe!
    • DigiGal Internet Archive Recordings
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2012, 04:02:23 PM »
I recently picked up a MixPre-D which uses input transformers and I find it to be very transparent.

If you are, however, looking for a model without transformers Sound Devices offers the USB Pre 2.  Which can be operated in standalone mode powered by a 5V USB battery without using a computer. 

There are many tapers using the USB Pre 2 and I debated between the two myself for about a year.  I ultimately decided the MixPre-D fit my needs best, I'm very impressed with it and glad I went with MixPre-D instead.
Mics: AKG CK91/CK94/CK98/SE300 D-330BT | DPA 4060 4061 4266 | Neumann TLM 103 | Senn ME66/K6/K6RD MKE2 MD421 MD431 | Shure VP88 SM7B SM63L SM58 Anniversary Cables: Gotham GAC-4/1 Quad w/Neutrik EMC | Gotham GAC-2pair w/AKG MK90/3 connectors | DigiGal AES>S/PDIF cable Preamp: SD MixPre-D Recorders: SD MixPre 6 | Marantz PMD 661 Edit: 2011 27" 3.4GHz Quad i7 iMac High Sierra | 2020 13" MBA Quad i7 Catalina | Wave Editor | xACT | Transmission | FCP X 

Offline StuStu

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2860
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2012, 04:33:54 PM »
It's my understanding that the 788's pre is different than the other 7xxs. ???
MK5, MK8, MK41, KM184D, CK77, B3 ---CMD 2U XT, KC5, KCY, AKI---KCY Tinybox, Ugly BB---AETA 4MinX, PMD661 MKII, R-26, M-10, MR-1

Offline raoulduke

  • Trade Count: (52)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 80
  • Got Gefell?
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2012, 04:48:50 PM »

http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/recorders/788t-mic-pres

Quote
788T Microphone Preamplifiers

The 788T introduces a new microphone preamp and analog-to-digital topology to Sound Devices. This new circuit improves the dynamic range of the microphone inputs beyond the performance of the class-leading 702, 702T, 722 and 744T recorders.

The preamps in the two and four-channel 7-Series (702, 702T, 722, and 744T) use discrete transistors (high-quality, old-school, high-current op-amps). These are great sounding preamps connected to a quality, low-noise analog-to-digital converter chipset. Performance versus power consumption broke new ground when these products were introduced, and have yet to be bested in their class in real-world measurements…until the 788T.

The preamps in the 788T were designed in 2008 with the latest topologies and electronic parts. The 788T mic preamps outperform the preamps on the two and four channel recorders, while drawing less power. The 788T has improved dynamic range, resulting largely from an analog-to-digital converter with several dB more dynamic range. While this A/D chip draws slightly more power than those in the two/four channel 7-Series, the preamp circuitry draws less than the earlier recorders. Additionally, these new preamps are fully digitally controlled. There is no analog audio running through a pot like in the old designs. This gives several benefits, including precise gain matching between channels, more control over the limiter, and a much more dB-linear gain curve. It also provides for hooks to control levels electronically, if required in the future.

Because the 788T has eight microphone preamps, its inputs can draw more overall power than the inputs on the two and four channel recorders. When not using inputs the front-panel gain control can be used to turn individual microphone preamps and A/D circuits off, increasing battery runtime.

No, the 702, 702T, 722, and 744T cannot be upgraded. The 788T is a clean-sheet design with an entirely new analog architecture that is not retrofittable to the smaller recorders.

Offline DATPAT

  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • Gender: Male
  • Recovering Gear Slut
    • Mobiltracks-Mobile A/V Recording
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2012, 06:29:55 PM »
Interesting. Like i said the guy i talked too didn't seem like he was a senior tech. But he said all the 7 series recorders had the same pre's and the mixer's were all the same with the lundahl trani's.
Mic's(pairs) AKG (414's, 391's, Se-10's, )AT 853's, 4050's,BEYER MC 740,Gefell m300's, NEUMANN U89  i's, SKM-140 Set , TLM 170's, 102's, OKTAVA Mk-012 set,319's, SENNHEISER MKH-8050's, Sanken CMS-10, SOUNDFIELD SPS200,ST-250.PROJECTS LSD-2, & C1's,TELFUNKEN Ela 260 Field Set (H,C,O), Copper heads
Decks: Tascam Dr100Mk2,DR-680, HS-P82, Zoom F-8,Fostex LR-16, Mackie SDR 2496
Pre's- Onyx Satallite,  Niaint Littlebox W/OT, Apogee AD -1000, Mini -Me, CoopePSA1
 Video: JVC GV-LS2WE, panasonic FZ-1000
Playback: B& K and Adcom Power Amps and Martin Logan Electrostatic's and Tannoy nearfields
http://www.mobiltracks.net

Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2298
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2012, 01:40:55 PM »
Another point is the mixers, from the mixpre up to the 552, only have input transformers, with active balanced output stages. This results in a more transparent sound. The MP-1 and MM-1 mono preamps have Lundahl input transformers and SD custom built output transformers.This gives those units a slightly different sonic signature than the balance of their product line.
AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices Pre Amp's Mixer's Vs. Decks
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2012, 05:04:01 PM »
SD552 and older 442 have transformer outputs on their XLRs.
Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF