Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Sony PCM-D100 Part2  (Read 22004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline schoepsnbox

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
  • Gender: Male
  • Nbox...........Zero's and One's
Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« on: July 31, 2014, 08:29:59 PM »
Old thread:

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=164484.360


Just pulled my first recording with this unit..who's got one and what are your experiences?
 
Definitely dont like the fact that the power switch does not lock with the hold on WTF is up with that?  Also is the DSD only DSF files at 2.8Mhz?

Can someone lock the old mile long thread, please!

Offline jb63

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 510
  • Gender: Male
  • if not now when?
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2014, 01:49:42 AM »
DSD is definitely only DSDIFF files at 2.8. Same as the mr1.
But I swear by it. I've used an mr1 side by side with an mr1000 and 2.8 is huge enough.
this is definitely not normal

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2014, 11:18:11 AM »
Just pulled my first recording with this unit..who's got one and what are your experiences?
 
Definitely dont like the fact that the power switch does not lock with the hold on WTF is up with that?  Also is the DSD only DSF files at 2.8Mhz?
In general, I very much like the PCM-D100's performance. However, as pointed out by some users, the limiter is a bit strange in that there are times when one can hear a loud sound and then a click as the limiter
returns the volume to normal. This is because it sometimes does the return all at once, and thus the click.
At any event, in combination with the USBPre2 the D100 absolutely shines. Even without the USBPre2 its preamps are quiet enough to take care of even the most demanding dynamic mics.

Offline spyder9

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12016
  • Gender: Male
  • fahgeddaboudit
    • My Archived shows
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2014, 09:13:29 PM »
Bump!

Offline ilduclo

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2014, 09:10:33 AM »
I've been doing more recordings with internal mics on my d5o........ sounds like the d100's are nearly as good at the d1's, without the extra size of the d1? anyone do any comparisons from d50, d1oo and d1?

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2014, 10:22:56 AM »
I've been doing more recordings with internal mics on my d5o........ sounds like the d100's are nearly as good at the d1's, without the extra size of the d1? anyone do any comparisons from d50, d1oo and d1?
I haven't seen any comparisons with the D1, but you may want to take a look at the following for a D50/D100 mic comparison: https://soundcloud.com/sparrowsrest/comparison-recordings-made-with-the-sony-pcm-d50-pcm-d100-april-2014

Offline ilduclo

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2014, 11:16:35 AM »
thanks, Amir, I will check it out

Offline t.jay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2014, 04:17:40 PM »
Hey guys,

Is it possible to use the D100 as external microphone on my Mac (for Skype talks etc.)? Does it work via USB or do I need a special cable? Thank you for your help!

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2014, 11:44:01 AM »
Guys, yesterday I was recording a concert via the PCM-D100 internal mics from a front-row seat. I was recording with the 48/24 setting, Low-mic continuation and the 100SNDB feature set to on. As I finished the first hour of recording and the concert entered some sort of silent mode, I stopped recording and started a new file. However, after almost 8 minutes of recording the PCM-D100 suddenly turned off, prompting me to think that I'd run out of battery juice. But when I turned it on, the recorder displayed 2 battery bars and the next recording smoothly went ahead for the rest of the concert -- another hour or so. Now, as strange as my question might sound, what do you think might have generated that problem? I have 18GB of free space on the internal memory and haven't yet resorted to using a memory card for the D100. Should this be cause for concern in future recordings?
Also -- and as a relevant issue, I'm wondering when I should consider replacing the PCM-D100 batteries. Currently it displays 2 bars, but I don't know to how many minutes/hours these remaining bars can be translated. As I'm visually impaired (totally blind), I have no choice but to ask someone to check the battery status for me -- for fear of ending up with no juice. On the other hand, getting rid of these batteries which still have some juice left might be overkill. It's a pity Sony hasn't added the option to make its recorder menus/options talk -- most Olympus LS recorders have this great feature for the visually impaired.
Thanks for your comments and insights

Offline schoepsnbox

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
  • Gender: Male
  • Nbox...........Zero's and One's
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2014, 08:47:09 PM »
Guys, yesterday I was recording a concert via the PCM-D100 internal mics from a front-row seat. I was recording with the 48/24 setting, Low-mic continuation and the 100SNDB feature set to on. As I finished the first hour of recording and the concert entered some sort of silent mode, I stopped recording and started a new file. However, after almost 8 minutes of recording the PCM-D100 suddenly turned off, prompting me to think that I'd run out of battery juice. But when I turned it on, the recorder displayed 2 battery bars and the next recording smoothly went ahead for the rest of the concert -- another hour or so. Now, as strange as my question might sound, what do you think might have generated that problem? I have 18GB of free space on the internal memory and haven't yet resorted to using a memory card for the D100. Should this be cause for concern in future recordings?
Also -- and as a relevant issue, I'm wondering when I should consider replacing the PCM-D100 batteries. Currently it displays 2 bars, but I don't know to how many minutes/hours these remaining bars can be translated. As I'm visually impaired (totally blind), I have no choice but to ask someone to check the battery status for me -- for fear of ending up with no juice. On the other hand, getting rid of these batteries which still have some juice left might be overkill. It's a pity Sony hasn't added the option to make its recorder menus/options talk -- most Olympus LS recorders have this great feature for the visually impaired.
Thanks for your comments and insights

Did You accidentally turn the power switch off?  This unit does NOT lock the power switch even after the hold is engaged..I taped the power switch on last
I took it out..also Tried this deck at a local bar for a friends band with the internal mics and there was all sorts of brickwalling even tho the levels were not over..shame on SONY..this deck should say FONY on it..lots of issues with this one.  Not happy at All :facepalm:
« Last Edit: August 15, 2014, 08:48:58 PM by schoepsnbox »

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2014, 09:59:01 AM »
Did You accidentally turn the power switch off?  This unit does NOT lock the power switch even after the hold is engaged..I taped the power switch on last
I took it out..also Tried this deck at a local bar for a friends band with the internal mics and there was all sorts of brickwalling even tho the levels were not over..shame on SONY..this deck should say FONY on it..lots of issues with this one.  Not happy at All :facepalm:
No, but this hasn't yet happened to me. Unlike you, I very much like the PCM-D100's internal mics in concerts and venues. However, the PCM-D100 should be used with its Low-mic switch turned on in order for it not to distort. With the Low-mic switch, I can record very lound sounds even with the gain knob half-way or 75 percent up. Also, don't forget to use the supplied windscreen as it's a prerequisite for distortion-free recordings.

Offline Whatisvalis

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2014, 08:30:41 AM »
Anyone done any ambient field recording with the D100?  How's the noise level?

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2014, 10:28:05 AM »
Love the D100 for ambient recordings. Very low noise level.

Offline ilduclo

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #13 on: August 21, 2014, 10:52:33 AM »

^ I went ahead and listened to the comparison recordings of the internals of the d50 vs the d100. Quite a bit of diff, and then I tried a quieter music set, electronics and vocals with the d50 internals. There IS a lot of noise in it.  I never noticed much, since I've only recorded LOUD sets with it so far.... but, not worth the $800 to me so far.....if I get quiet bands with respectful audiences, my dpa omnis do the job, they actually work well for everything BUT the quiet shows with loud chatty audiences.

Offline Whatisvalis

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2014, 11:48:08 AM »
I will be traveling for 6 months so I really need a portable recorder I can get good street ambiences / field recordings with. I have an m10, which is fantastic for loud stuff, but too noisey for ambiences.

Is the d100 a step down from the D50 for these situations?

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2014, 11:51:02 AM »
I have the M10, D50, and D100. For ambient sounds I wouldn't think twice: D100 all the way.

Keep in mind the D100 also plays nice with external mice: even directly plugged in. I've used with some binaural mics (for ambient sounds) up through an EV RE20. All with success.

Some have reported the D100 does not do such a good job with really loud music: and that may be true (I have not tested myself). But for spoken voice, ambient sounds, and any other soft of quieter sounds: beautiful.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2014, 12:16:00 PM »
I have the M10, D50, and D100. For ambient sounds I wouldn't think twice: D100 all the way.

Keep in mind the D100 also plays nice with external mice: even directly plugged in. I've used with some binaural mics (for ambient sounds) up through an EV RE20. All with success.

Some have reported the D100 does not do such a good job with really loud music: and that may be true (I have not tested myself). But for spoken voice, ambient sounds, and any other soft of quieter sounds: beautiful.
Agreed! I've also seen/worked with all of these Sony recorders and can confidently say that the PCM-D100 offers the best internal mic/preamp performance -- currently own a D100 myself. As for loud music and sound sources, the trick is to use the Low-mike continuation physical switch on the left edge of the recorder, and that'll basically take care of any sort of audio. So far I've never resorted to the versatile Limiter in loud concerts with the Low-mike continuation switch set to On. Simply put, I absolutely love this recorder and -- in combination with my Sound Devices USBPre2 card/mixer -- I basically have a full-blown studio.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2014, 12:18:34 PM by Amir »

Offline t.jay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #17 on: August 22, 2014, 09:12:55 AM »
I have some problems with my windscreen. It seems to be too small! It is a nightmare to put it onto the D100. I have to stretch it with much force, otherwise it doesn't fit. Anyone with similar problems? Or could it be that I just have a badly manufactured exemplar of the windscreen?

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #18 on: August 22, 2014, 09:24:47 AM »
My windscreen is very tight. I find it relatively simple to put on, but I do have to give some attention and care to doing so. The benefit is it won't come off easily! I suppose you could have a windscreen that truly is too small. But I can't simply pull my windscreen on in a nanosecond. It probably takes me 30 seconds to put it on properly. But it seems to fit and do the job well once placed correctly.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2014, 09:43:58 AM »
I have some problems with my windscreen. It seems to be too small! It is a nightmare to put it onto the D100. I have to stretch it with much force, otherwise it doesn't fit. Anyone with similar problems? Or could it be that I just have a badly manufactured exemplar of the windscreen?
I don't call it a true nightmare, but I can confirm your findings. There's nothing wrong with your windscreen IMO. Interestingly, The PCM-M10's extra windscreen which should be ordered separately has the very same problems. The same can also be said about Olympus LS-100 and its $49 windscreen. My guess is that if manufacturers widen or lengthen their windscreens, they'll become loose. That said, however, I've always wondered why they haven't come up with a better solution.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2014, 08:52:43 AM »
Guys, Transom's review of the PCM-D100 is here -- http://transom.org/2014/sony-pcm-d100/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sony-pcm-d100
It's a very interesting review especially from a broadcast/journalism-oriented perspective.

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2014, 11:03:48 AM »
Yeah a strange review. The lack of XLR's is a major stumbling block for me. The D100 is a great recorder with good pre's and ADC. I only used mine 2 or 3 times before I sold it because I found it too big for comfortable stealthing (being paired with the XLR-1 as well for P48). If you just need a minijack input I would recommend it.

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2014, 12:28:10 PM »
@yates7592: I'm not a sound professional so I may be ignorant of the importance of XLR connectors. But my naive understanding is XLR connectors were important for:

1. better quality audio recordings
2. more secure connections

I have probably frowned upon non-XLR connectors in the past. However, I found that the Sony D100 has amazing sound quality when using the mini-jack connectors. This is with a wide variety of microphones. I could discern no downside at all (I may be a recording-novice, but my ears are pretty good.)

I thought the connections would be more "dubious". I was simply wrong about the D100. I found the connections very tight and secure. I think XLRs would be even better, but I'd grade the mini-jack connections on the D100 as "A" in terms of security/snugness, etc. I'd give XLR connectors an A+. Anything at the A level I'd be happy with. I realize there are some situations where the difference between the two connectors might make a practical difference: but in my own usage scenarios I experience no practical difference.

So am I missing something here? Are there other ways in which an XLR connector would be considered superior to mini-jack? My major concern was audio quality, and the D100 comes out A++++ on that.

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2014, 04:11:15 PM »
@mitchellm - yes xlr input becomes quite important when your mics are terminated with xlr's and you want to take advantage of that . Robust connection, fully balanced, zero interference - one less thing to worry about.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2014, 04:51:28 PM »
@mitchellm - yes xlr input becomes quite important when your mics are terminated with xlr's and you want to take advantage of that . Robust connection, fully balanced, zero interference - one less thing to worry about.
My hunch is that when one spends about $800 on a recorder without XLR, they consciously seek other factors such as audio quality. The PCM-D100 delivers on that front and as someone who owns Olympus LS-100 and has worked with the DR-100MKII, H6 and H4N I should make the bold proclamation that I'll never return to anything below the D100 in terms of preamp performance.
That said, I'm a broadcast-oriented individual and preamp performance is very important to me -- especially in ultra-quiet areas when dynamic mics or internal mics are used. Most people here use their devices to record concerts in conjunction with battery boxes/preamps/low-powered mics; so they might not/need not judge the D1000 the way I do.

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #25 on: August 28, 2014, 07:09:43 PM »
@yates7592: Got it! I had completely forgotten about mics terminated with XLRs. None of mine are, so I can always use an XLR-to-mini-jack cable. Makes complete sense what you're saying.

I'm not in broadcast, but like Amir my main interests are in ambient sounds and spoken voice. Both of these are relatively quiet: especially relative to some bands. So, for me, high quality pre-amps in a small package is priority #1 to me. Lesser pre-amps don't work so well, or add noticeable background hiss. That's why I love the D100: very high quality pre-amps.

I should say that I've always been in search of the "perfect" audio recorder: one that I can use in my office, going other locations in my city for interviews, and even when traveling. The D100 is that all-in-one perfect answer. When at my university I can pair it with the Sound Devices Mix-Pre (or a SD USB Pre2) to do interviews with great lav mics. Can record in my office with a nice studio mic. When traveling far away I have 3 "travel" mics: small electret powered lav mic, small binaural mics, and a relatively small interview mic (Beyerdynamic M88). The flexibility the D100 gives me is fantastic.

I'll confess that if I were recording lots of loud music, with boisterous and unruly crowds, I'd probably opt for my Sony M10. Don't need the super quality pre-amps in those situations. The M10 works well with loud environments. And if something goes wrong, I'm out $200 instead of $800.

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2014, 05:13:44 AM »
sony pcm-d100 is too expensive, I test here both pcm-d100 and wmd6c

I get better details in the sound with sony wmd6c metal tape c 90 ,

on metal stand ,I use not dolby , only with low level live shows get I noise

but with loud live shows works it fine, more details in the sound as with the sony pcm-d100 .cheers
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 09:36:58 AM by flipp022 »

Online beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2014, 09:27:01 AM »
Do you any audio samples of comparison between these two?Id like to listen to them.
Mics: Sennheiser mke2,AT 933's(c)(h),Soundman OKM II Rock Studio,Sonic Studios DSM-6SL,Countryman B3,CA-14 (O) , CA-14 (C) , Aiwa CM30,Shure mv88
Pre's: PA3SX-U , CA-9200 ,  CA-UGLY II
BBox:PA-6LC3B , CA-UBB (x 3) , AC3
Decks: Sony PCM M10 (x 2)  , Tascam dr-2d

VIDEO : Sony FDR AX100 (4k) , Sony FX 1000 ( 3CMOS )
PHOTO : 7D x2 , 1DMK4 , Fujifilm X100T ( Canon EF 400mm F4 DO, Canon EF 500 F4 L ,Canon EF Extender 2x II,1.4xIII, 2x lll

A/V software: SONY VEGAS PRO 9.0e  -SONY VEGAS PRO 13,DVD Architect 5.0b

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2014, 09:41:09 AM »
I delete samples , I must taped new show tonight , but maybe can I recorded new samples , of PC loudspeaker

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2014, 11:37:24 AM »
Both samples sound pretty bad. Not impressed with the older wmd6c.

On the D100 the record volume was set too high: so there's noticeable clipping/distortion. On the WMd6c the recording level is fine, but the audio quality is okay (at best). You wrote that your "PC loudspeaker" is okay, but clearly it's not too good. That may explain why you can't hear the difference. This kind of music, single piano playing, is something the D100 captures very well.

And, of course, you don't seem to mention what mic you are using. It could be, especially in this instance, that the D100 would get a better recording w/o the external mic (hard to know, really, from this sound sample).

I'd re-record, or re-test, but with the sound levels set appropriately for the D100. The compare with headphones instead of cheap computer speakers.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 11:55:17 AM by mitchellm »

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #30 on: September 16, 2014, 11:52:41 AM »
what I wants of my money is , is that the sony pcm-d100 recorder , is 100% better as a cassette recorder  of the year 1983 ,

and that is not so , Sometimes I find the cassette recorder  WMD6C better ,

with loud live shows , then hear I not the cassette recorder  Noise, okay my ears is al 69 years old , I is tapper sinds 1959 , is too not so good for my ears all the year in loud Noise,
but I think , I hear it good , why is the sony pcm-d100 recorder  not much better, as old thing ?

Ane

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #31 on: September 16, 2014, 12:05:54 PM »
what I wants of my money is , is that the sony pcm-d100 recorder , is 100% better as a cassette recorder  of the year 1983 ,

and that is not so , Sometimes I find the cassette recorder  WMD6C better ,

with loud live shows , then hear I not the cassette recorder  Noise, okay my ears is al 69 years old , I is tapper sinds 1959 , is too not so good for my ears all the year in loud Noise,
but I think , I hear it good , why is the sony pcm-d100 recorder  not much better, as old thing ?

Ane

I say al it fast recording of my pc loudspeakers , the sound is in windows in mp3 format , I play it on my pc , and recorded it , then wants I for my money , thar sony pcm-d100 is much better as cassette recorder , the mic is homemade so as Always , I used , what you hear , what is not so good comes by pc loudspeaker ,but it is, the difference of two recorder ,and that is a little bit, for a recorder of 800 dollar , that find I.

Offline imightgotothebeach

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #32 on: September 16, 2014, 03:00:15 PM »
Yeah a strange review. The lack of XLR's is a major stumbling block for me. The D100 is a great recorder with good pre's and ADC. I only used mine 2 or 3 times before I sold it because I found it too big for comfortable stealthing (being paired with the XLR-1 as well for P48). If you just need a minijack input I would recommend it.

Thought I'd chime in, too.  I bought one of these and a Zoom H5 at the same time.  Comparing the built-in mics, the Sony sounded much better (and the build quality like others have mentioned is fantastic), but for me the Sony is so incredibly limited (mics aren't removable/ no XLRS/ etc)  I couldn't justify the $$$.

Offline jmerin

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #33 on: September 18, 2014, 09:16:04 AM »
I take it that this deck has issues still? I love my m10. But I hear that you cannot put the deck on hold.
Mics: Schoeps MK4's | Schoeps MK41's | Schoeps Mk21's
Pre-Amps: Schoeps VMS02ib | Nbox Platinum KCY
Cables: KCY 250/5 Ig (2)
Recorders: Sony M10  | Tascam 70D l Edirol R-44

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2014, 01:12:51 PM »
sony pcm-d100 , it comes from the factory in china, for 70 dollar.
here for $95.39 , http://www.wrenthamwest.org/pants.php?id=sony-pcmd100-portable-highresolution-recorder-p-14352.html
cheers
« Last Edit: September 24, 2014, 03:14:02 AM by flipp022 »

Online beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2014, 07:58:56 AM »
Well that is a great price but im a little apprehensive that ill receive anything,if anyone else gets one post here. ;)
Mics: Sennheiser mke2,AT 933's(c)(h),Soundman OKM II Rock Studio,Sonic Studios DSM-6SL,Countryman B3,CA-14 (O) , CA-14 (C) , Aiwa CM30,Shure mv88
Pre's: PA3SX-U , CA-9200 ,  CA-UGLY II
BBox:PA-6LC3B , CA-UBB (x 3) , AC3
Decks: Sony PCM M10 (x 2)  , Tascam dr-2d

VIDEO : Sony FDR AX100 (4k) , Sony FX 1000 ( 3CMOS )
PHOTO : 7D x2 , 1DMK4 , Fujifilm X100T ( Canon EF 400mm F4 DO, Canon EF 500 F4 L ,Canon EF Extender 2x II,1.4xIII, 2x lll

A/V software: SONY VEGAS PRO 9.0e  -SONY VEGAS PRO 13,DVD Architect 5.0b

Offline flipp

  • resident curmudgeon
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 4309
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2014, 11:58:26 AM »
Well that is a great price but im a little apprehensive that ill receive anything,if anyone else gets one post here. ;)

Sorry I even visited the link. They list a Sony M-10 carrying case @ $86.54 while they list the recorder itself @ $13.68. At least as bothersome is the mismatch between the company name displayed on the webpage and the actual url. Too many warning signs to even consider placing an order.

Offline flipp022

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2014, 12:37:45 PM »
you has equal , the website want Steal your money , look out
 

Offline t.jay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2014, 04:52:47 AM »
Does anybody know the difference between the "Limiter" function and the "S/N 100db" function? In the manual there is written that the 100db function is better for quiet recordings because it results in lower noise. But I made some tests with my Sony PCM D100 and I can't hear a difference when the 100db is off (and the limiter is on instead). Can anyone explain in simple words when and for what reason I should use the "S/N 100db" function instead of the "Limiter" function? Thank yo so much!!!

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #39 on: September 29, 2014, 06:23:13 AM »
Does anybody know the difference between the "Limiter" function and the "S/N 100db" function? In the manual there is written that the 100db function is better for quiet recordings because it results in lower noise. But I made some tests with my Sony PCM D100 and I can't hear a difference when the 100db is off (and the limiter is on instead). Can anyone explain in simple words when and for what reason I should use the "S/N 100db" function instead of the "Limiter" function? Thank yo so much!!!
The S/N 100DB function provides you with a better signal-to-noise ratio when recording. However, that improvement isn't noticeable in many instances to our so-called "naked ears" and you need a very quiet place to observe or demonstrate that. When this feature is active, you can't use the limiter. That is, they can't be used simultaneously.
As for the limiter, it allows you to avoid audio clipping by recording at a lower level. With PCM-D100 this works by lowering the volume by 12DB or so, and the justification is that increasing the volume later -- say on the computer/in the post -- is easier than dealing with distorted audio which can't be fixed in almost all circumstances.
I myself don't use the S/N 100DB feature unless I'm recording in ultra-quiet places -- a far cry from what you normally encounter in the world. Under such a circumstance you might get the benefits of quieter recordings.

HTH.

Offline Whatisvalis

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #40 on: October 04, 2014, 02:01:16 PM »
Just thought I'd bump this and see how those who have adopted the D100 are getting along?

I'm really having issues with the price considering a used D50 can be had for $250-$300.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #41 on: October 04, 2014, 02:35:12 PM »
Just thought I'd bump this and see how those who have adopted the D100 are getting along?

I'm really having issues with the price considering a used D50 can be had for $250-$300.
That's indeed a valid concern -- I myself grappled with the very same dilemma. However, if your major concern is an upgraded D50 experience (by that I primarily mean enhanced audio quality and improved SNr), the PCM-D100 would be hard to ignore as a viable option. As far as I'm concerned, I've been unabashedly using the D100 in places where there has been no need for stealth recording and the D100 -- mounted on a tripod -- hasn't disappointed me at all.

Offline BlindGuyEars

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #42 on: October 04, 2014, 02:39:51 PM »
I'm currently a happy M10 owner, using it with a Church Audio pre and DPA 4060's.

Questions about the 100:

Does the unit supply enough power for my DPA's?  The recorder itself is bigger than the M10, but if the preamps are excellent and the unit can power my mics, then I might be able to eliminate one box, one cable and one 9V battery from the set up. :)

If you record to one of the DSD formats, how do you then get the files into PCM for any post processing?  And, are the arguable benefits of DSD negated by that conversion to PCM?

I'm blind as well so Amir, if you're reading this, have you recorded anything in DSD and which software did you use to edit the results?  I usually clean things up in Sonar and Sound Forge, but both of those deal strictly with PCM.


Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #43 on: October 04, 2014, 03:19:44 PM »
I'm currently a happy M10 owner, using it with a Church Audio pre and DPA 4060's.

Questions about the 100:

Does the unit supply enough power for my DPA's?  The recorder itself is bigger than the M10, but if the preamps are excellent and the unit can power my mics, then I might be able to eliminate one box, one cable and one 9V battery from the set up. :)

If you record to one of the DSD formats, how do you then get the files into PCM for any post processing?  And, are the arguable benefits of DSD negated by that conversion to PCM?

I'm blind as well so Amir, if you're reading this, have you recorded anything in DSD and which software did you use to edit the results?  I usually clean things up in Sonar and Sound Forge, but both of those deal strictly with PCM.
Well, currently I don't have those DPA's to test them with the D100. Quite interestingly, A couple of months ago I was looking for a high-end set of so-called stealth mics to complement the PCM-D100 and was even willing to pay the proverbial arms and legs for them. However, having listened to many recordings made by them online and having had my own D100 in action for some time, I came to the conclusion that The D100's internal mics are true gems in and out of themselves -- withought an iota of exaggeration. Of course, I'm not an stealth recorder -- I even take my own tripod to the conserts and venues I attend; as such, my use might radically differ from yours. But if stealth recording isn't your major concern, the D100's internal mics -- especially with the Low-mic continuation switch and the provided windscreen at work -- would do a fantastic job. I can assure you that the D100 preamps are the best thing you can buy with less than $1000.
As for DSD, I don't use it at all. Honestly recording in DSD isn't worth it when I can't easily edit those files. So I consider DSD a potential plus -- or an investment -- for the future. Some might consider the D100's DSD feature a gimmick, but I believe Sony could have developed this recorder without any DSD-related features and still could have sold it for $795 if their concern had been to silence DSD naysayers. So, IMO, it's good to have DSD as it might prove much more useful in the future with the adoption of the format.

Offline cosmickc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!
    • Tape List
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #44 on: October 07, 2014, 09:26:22 AM »
Question.  I received a catalog from Andorama and it says the Sony PCM-100 "Records 4 external inputs in two pairs as two stereo audio files."  Is this true? I don't find this claim anywhere else.

Thanks

KC

Offline t.jay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #45 on: October 08, 2014, 03:13:02 PM »
Question.  I received a catalog from Andorama and it says the Sony PCM-100 "Records 4 external inputs in two pairs as two stereo audio files."  Is this true?

That's definitely wrong! The PCM D100 has a mic input and a line input (analogue/optical). Both are minijacks. It is definitely not possible to record more than one input at once.

Offline cosmickc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!
    • Tape List
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #46 on: October 08, 2014, 07:38:15 PM »
Question.  I received a catalog from Andorama and it says the Sony PCM-100 "Records 4 external inputs in two pairs as two stereo audio files."  Is this true?

That's definitely wrong! The PCM D100 has a mic input and a line input (analogue/optical). Both are minijacks. It is definitely not possible to record more than one input at once.

Thank you!  I thought it was a typo.  Not a 4 track recorder at all.

Offline ghibliss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #47 on: October 28, 2014, 02:48:24 PM »
The recorder can be set to record both a pcm digital file as well as an mp3 file simultaneously!  This is listed in the literature and is what they are referring to.

Offline weroflu

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #48 on: October 29, 2014, 02:26:20 AM »
Anyone actually using the D100:

Can you give some real world comparisons of the D100 mic preamps to other known recorders/outboard preamps.




Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #49 on: October 29, 2014, 09:17:27 AM »
The PCM-D100 is a wonderful recorder. The quality of audio recordings is much higher quality than, e.g., the PCM M10 (also a great recorder). Very quiet preamps. Very good sound. Works well with built-in mics, plug-in mics, or mics via something like the MixPre-D. I have not heard a portable recorder (in anywhere near the same price range) with the same quality of sound.

However, if you are recording only loud music (as probably do most people on this forum) then the D100 may not be worth the price for you. With really loud sounds, the "quiet" preamps mean much less.

On the other hand, the more you record quiet music, audio interviews, ambient sounds: that's where the D100 really shines due to the high quality pre-amps.

Transom.org recently ran a review of this recorder. Check them out.

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #50 on: October 29, 2014, 09:41:24 AM »
During the brief time I owned a D100, I did a very quick A/B test against my M10, and the D100 was noticeably quieter, even to my cloth ears. 

Offline weroflu

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #51 on: November 27, 2014, 07:17:59 AM »
Hello Yates or any previous posters:

I am still trying to get a sense of the sound of the mic preamps on the D100. No one yet has offered a comparison to something that I know the sound of. I'm somewhat tempted to spring for one now as the price is low combined with strong dollar:euro.


Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #52 on: November 27, 2014, 07:22:33 AM »

I am still trying to get a sense of the sound of the mic preamps on the D100. No one yet has offered a comparison to something that I know the sound of. I'm somewhat tempted to spring for one now as the price is low combined with strong dollar:euro.



It's hard to respond when you don't give us any idea of "something that I know the sound of". What kinds of products are you thinking of. Many people at this forum know the sound of the Sony M10 and D50. And there have been countless comparisons of the M10 (especially) against other recorders. Right now I'd be totally guessing at what you want in terms of comparison.

Offline weroflu

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #53 on: November 27, 2014, 08:09:12 AM »
Sorry if I was vague. In a previous post I asked for a comparison to basically any other preamp. I got some responses like it's quiet or better than this or that, but what I'm looking for is something more qualitative such as: transients are quicker, better low end, smoother, sharper than this or that preamp, etc. I am familiar with the m10 but the responses so far were it's better, which doesn't tell me much.

If anyone has a clip or link to recordings done with the D100 and external mics that would be better.


Offline spyder9

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12016
  • Gender: Male
  • fahgeddaboudit
    • My Archived shows
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #54 on: November 30, 2014, 01:16:09 PM »

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Is a 4 channel slut and
  • Trade Count: (117)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40423
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #55 on: December 03, 2014, 01:38:57 AM »
I'd also love to hear some tapes with the d100 using external mics too! Preferably with Schoeps>preamp>d100 and Schoeps>same preamp>m10 so that I can truly hear the difference between the two decks ;) But I know that's a lot to ask!
Schoeps MK4's & MK41's ->
Schoeps | NBob 250/05 KCY's ->
Schoeps VMS02IB | Naiant +60v PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Tascam DR-70D's ->
128gb & 64gb SanDisk Extreme Pro SD Cards

FiiO E10K DAC/HP Amp & E11K HP Amp ->
Sony MDR-7506 Cans & SA-VA15 Speakers | Monster iSport Victory Earbuds

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean | http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420 | http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #56 on: December 03, 2014, 04:09:20 AM »
I have a few shows I taped with the D100 and various external mics:

DPA 4061 > Battery box > D100

and

DPA 4006 > XLR-1 > D100

Not a comp in any shape or form, but just a flavour. I can up a few samples if anyone's interested.

Offline weroflu

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #57 on: December 03, 2014, 04:21:39 AM »
interested in those samples yates

I would also like to hear schoeps>phantom power>d100

The d100 spec is 5v PIP so a battery box is not a must, another good selling point.

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #58 on: December 03, 2014, 11:19:04 AM »
Here's a sample of each mic going into the D100:

Files (53.4 MB total)
DPA4061-BB D100.rar
DPA4006-XLR1-D100.rar
 
Will be deleted on
10 December, 2014 

Download link
http://we.tl/aoabJcV72X 

Online beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #59 on: December 03, 2014, 01:22:43 PM »
interested in those samples yates

I would also like to hear schoeps>phantom power>d100

The d100 spec is 5v PIP so a battery box is not a must, another good selling point.


Where do you find this info i don't get that information in any google search,if the d100 does output 5 volts plug in power than this would be a great combo with dpa4061 ,but i doubt this is correct.Anyone confirm?


Mics: Sennheiser mke2,AT 933's(c)(h),Soundman OKM II Rock Studio,Sonic Studios DSM-6SL,Countryman B3,CA-14 (O) , CA-14 (C) , Aiwa CM30,Shure mv88
Pre's: PA3SX-U , CA-9200 ,  CA-UGLY II
BBox:PA-6LC3B , CA-UBB (x 3) , AC3
Decks: Sony PCM M10 (x 2)  , Tascam dr-2d

VIDEO : Sony FDR AX100 (4k) , Sony FX 1000 ( 3CMOS )
PHOTO : 7D x2 , 1DMK4 , Fujifilm X100T ( Canon EF 400mm F4 DO, Canon EF 500 F4 L ,Canon EF Extender 2x II,1.4xIII, 2x lll

A/V software: SONY VEGAS PRO 9.0e  -SONY VEGAS PRO 13,DVD Architect 5.0b

Offline weroflu

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #60 on: December 03, 2014, 01:47:55 PM »
http://www.thomann.de/gb/sony_pcm_d100.htm

Sony PCM-D100, portable Audio-Recorder, LPCM Recording up to 24-Bit/192 kHz and DSD (Direct Stream Digital) with 2.8MHz Resolution, thomann two swiveling Condenser Mics 0°/90°/120° Angle adjustable, Frequency Range 20Hz - 30kHz, Sensitivity: -31dB/Pa, build-in Noise Limiter, 100dB Signal/Noise Ratio, supported Audio Formats: Linear PCM WAV up to 24Bit/192kHz, DSD Format with 2,8 MHz Sampling Rate, MP3: 320kbps or 128kbps, Playback only: thomann Flac, AAC & WMA, Super Bit Mapping, Panning Switch, Digital Peak Limiter, DSP- and Audio-Editing Functions, Digital Pitch Control, Low-Cut Filter, 5 Sec. Pre-Recording Buffer, Dualrecording of LPCM-WAV and MP3 Files, Backlite LED Display, Volume-Switch, build-in Speaker, 32GB internal Memory, Expansion-Slot for Memory thomann Stick and SD Card up to 128 GB,
5V Plugin Power
external Microphones, -20dB Pad, Inputs (1/8" Mini Jack): Line In, Mic-In, Optical-In, Outputs (1/8" Mini Jack): Line Out, Optical Out, Headphone Out, 6V Connection for Power Supply, MicroB USB2 Connection, incl. wireless thomann Remote Control, Windscreen, Bag, USB-Cable, Batterys and Audio Editing-Software Sound Forge Audio Studio

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #61 on: December 03, 2014, 01:53:07 PM »
I'm not directly responding to the 5V issue, but I've directly connected many a mic into the D100 with outstanding results. This includes dynamic mics needing a lot of gain (e.g. even an EV RE-20). Background noise: nada. Also used with lav mics and other mics needing electret connection: works, once again, beautifully.


Offline F.O.Bean

  • Is a 4 channel slut and
  • Trade Count: (117)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40423
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #62 on: December 03, 2014, 03:36:33 PM »
I would love to own (2) of these so that I had one for each of my rigs :) But I really want to do a comp and run mics>littlebox>d100 + littlebox>m10 so I can hear the true difference between the two decks. Is there a comp already out there like that?

I just DLd Nick's The Machine tape from the other night. Can't wait to hear it :)
Schoeps MK4's & MK41's ->
Schoeps | NBob 250/05 KCY's ->
Schoeps VMS02IB | Naiant +60v PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Tascam DR-70D's ->
128gb & 64gb SanDisk Extreme Pro SD Cards

FiiO E10K DAC/HP Amp & E11K HP Amp ->
Sony MDR-7506 Cans & SA-VA15 Speakers | Monster iSport Victory Earbuds

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean | http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420 | http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php

Offline spyder9

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12016
  • Gender: Male
  • fahgeddaboudit
    • My Archived shows
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #63 on: December 29, 2014, 08:29:07 PM »
Here's an acoustic show I recorded this summer when I had the D100. 

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=171121.0

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #64 on: February 20, 2015, 10:11:09 AM »
Guys, Sony has released a new firmware update for Sony PCM-D100. It's V1.02 and makes some enhancements to file splitting on memory cards. It's at http://www.sony.co.uk/support/en/content/cnt-dwnl/prd-dna/sony-pcmd100-firmware-update-ver102/PCM-D100

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #65 on: February 20, 2015, 10:53:40 AM »
great thanks for this! 
Ive been using the remote and can't split on the fly.

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #66 on: February 20, 2015, 12:24:09 PM »
@Amir: Many thanks. I didn't know about this update. Now I'm up-to-D100-speed again. Much appreciated.

Offline Amir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #67 on: February 20, 2015, 01:14:43 PM »
@mitchellm and @birdboy01: you're most welcome. Sony PCM-D100 rocks here too!

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #68 on: February 20, 2015, 01:23:16 PM »
$800 for the d100 and used SD702s are selling for $1000 or so.  Why buy a d100?

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #69 on: February 20, 2015, 01:43:50 PM »
Owned the 702-- besides XLR's, other benefits over the D100   -- 10 sec preroll compared to Sony's 5 sec. Unbelievably rich and deep menu, SD is built like a tank.
Still, D100 has that Sony warmth ..

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #70 on: February 20, 2015, 01:54:51 PM »
@2manyrocks: SoundDevices makes fantastic gear. I have the USBPre 2 and I love it. But you are comparing a used price with new price: not exactly fair. New to new: $2,000 to $800. Is the SD702 worth the price: I'm sure it is. SoundDevices rocks!

But the D100 gives me ultra-portability. It's noticeably smaller than the 702, I can wear it on my belt (important for some stealth recording of ambient situations). It is my "travel studio" where I can use on its own, use with small binaural mics, use with a nice lapel mic, or use with something like the Beyer M88, or use on its own. All that gear can be packed into a very small space, and gives me great flexibility. The recorded sound is beautiful.

I'm sure the 702 is better for other kinds of uses. They are both fantastic tools.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 02:14:54 PM by mitchellm »

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #71 on: February 20, 2015, 02:12:22 PM »
Bottom line is D100 sound, especially in DSD mode.  Since I'm a festival guy, I like the lower power consumption from the D100 and the ability to use SDXC media.  The SD702 is a great recorder though, but if sound is your number 1 thing then the D100 wins.


Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #72 on: February 20, 2015, 03:17:08 PM »
Would the proper price comparison be d100 at $800 plus mixd pre at $800 vs. 702 at $2,000?

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #73 on: February 20, 2015, 04:15:35 PM »
The proper price comparison would be d100 vs. 702. I'm not really sure where you're going with all of this. Seems a bit hopeless, perhaps juvenile. Or perhaps you're just having a bad day.

If you don't need something that's very portable (i.e wear on a belt, put discretely into a purse, etc.) then the D100 isn't for you. Simple eh?

The SD702 isn't nearly as portable as the D100. That's neither a plus nor a minus. Different horses. And for the D100's primary usage scenario the fact that is does not use XLR connectors is a plus. Normally this would not be the case, but right-angled mini-jack connectors take up, once again, much less space relative to XLRs. For obsessive gearheads trying to do a point-by-point comparison it might look bad, but for people needing something very portable, with high quality, the various design decisions Sony made are quite good and user-friendly. And, of course, the D100 is perfectly fine for capturing some things just using its internal mics.

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #74 on: February 20, 2015, 04:42:05 PM »
I'm trying to understand where the d100 fits within the overall scheme of available recorders.  It is only 2 tracks and no xlrs, yet the $800 price exceeds other 2 tracks with xlr inputs except the 702.  From that, I'm trying to understand what benefit is gained for spending $800 for a d100?  If you plan to use xlr mics, looks like you'd be stuck with an external preamp,too. 

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #75 on: February 20, 2015, 04:54:33 PM »
Aha, got it! I just use an XLR to mini-jack cable. Works fine. I've run an EV RE20 directly into the Sony D100 with great results! (Not a very realistic use case, but you get the idea.) I actually use a Beyer M88 as my "studio mic" when I'm traveling as it's pretty small, great sound, and works fantastic with the D100. At any rate the XLR to mini-jack cables I've used worked fine. In fact I notice no discernible difference in "background noise" when using the same mic via D100 versus using my USB Pre2.

Perhaps another key usage difference is I'm almost always using one mic (for ambient sound, for podcasts, etc.). In the case of 2 mics (e.g. 2 people with lapel mics in an interview situation) I use a MixPre with the D100. But that's primarily because I'm both the sound-guy and the interviewer at the same time: I don't have the ability to check levels while recording. The USBPre and the MixPre both have wonderfully effective limiters.

I think if I was doing a lot of 2 mic stuff, I'd go for the SD 702. It would be a much simpler setup. But 90% of the time I'm using one mic, and portability is the crucial factor. If, and when, I use 2 mic setups (and in those cases portability is really not a huge factor) then the USBPre or MixPre, or of course, 702 would be better solutions for me (especially since I always have to do double-duty).

I hope this helps a bit.

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #76 on: February 20, 2015, 05:25:04 PM »
I run a pair of Schoeps mics into one of my stereo preamps, which is run in front of my D100.  From the preamp I have a stereo cable that goes from two female XLRs to a single stereo right angle 1/8 mini-connector.  The 1/8 mini connector is plugged into the line-in jack.  For loud music I use the 20db pad on the left side of the of the D100.  It all works great.

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #77 on: February 20, 2015, 05:36:54 PM »
I'd buy a d100 and use an external pre any day of the week over the 702

DSD is fantastic - I just wish someone made a 6-8 channel DSD recorder
Remember Creationists are primates too... just a little less evolved
LMA Recordings

List

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #78 on: February 20, 2015, 05:55:57 PM »
Since this is a taper forum ... I don't record music all that much (as a percentage of all my recording work). But when I do I use the Soundman binaural mics or the Church CA-14s. Both are stereo but end in a mini-jack. Both work just fine with the D100. But for me the real "test case" is when using mics that need a lot more gain. If I were only taping music and relying only on something like the Church CA-14s (or something more expensive) with a mobile pre-amp, then I'd probably mainly use a Sony M10. Smaller, cheaper, and given all the various factors would work as well as the D100.

So in some cases the M10 might be the better choice, for my usage the D100 rocks, and in other cases the SD 702 would definitely be the best choice.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 05:58:15 PM by mitchellm »

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #79 on: February 20, 2015, 05:57:31 PM »
That helps and your patience is appreciated.     
 
There must be ten or twenty other handheld portable recorders that cost much less than the D100, some with XLR inputs and some with more channels.  For you guys to bypass all the other recorder options and spend so much extra money on the D100, you must see some advantages that I haven't quite yet grasped or figured out on my own.  That's where I need help understanding what you see as advantageous and worth the extra money?

In my own situation, I figure I could get a used SD702 for $1000-$1300 and either use my Rode NT45 omnis or Line Audio CM3s unless I also upgrade mics.    Now the SD has been out for a while and uses CF cards.  It's also a firewire unit.  The D100 is newer technology and no firewire is involved.    The SD100 is also smaller and uses AAs.   The SD has the reputation of being extremely reliable under harsh operating conditions and has an aluminum case.   If one tried to use the external mics on the D100, it wouldn't be the easiest thing to put on a stand.   You can tell I'm going back and forth in my mind here.   

So what pros/cons do you see between the two options? 

 
 

     


Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #80 on: February 20, 2015, 06:07:14 PM »
I'm with 2manyrocks - for pure 2-channel, I would buy a 702 in a heartbeat over a D100 for the reasons he mentioned.  I'm sure the D100 is a great recorder based on my great experience with the M10 and D50, but the SD recorders are in another class entirely, and you're getting top-quality preamps built in also.  I suppose if you own good external pres already then you wouldn't feel so inclined to get one of their recorders.  As much as I wish I could afford a 702, I wonder how much improvement I would really see (hear?) over my current chain of FP24 > M10.

To H2O's statement: I still do not see the advantages of DSD at all - can someone please enlighten me?  To me, unless you're making SACDs or keeping your DSD recording entirely in the DSD domain and using a DSD-capable DAC to listen to it, there's no point.  What am I missing?
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 06:41:45 PM by voltronic »
DPA 4061 | Line Audio CM3 | Naiant X-Q
Naiant PFAs | Shure FP24
Tascam DR-70D JWMod | Sony PCM-M10

Tascam DR-70D FAQ
Team Line Audio
Quote
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.    ///    If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music.
- Gustav Mahler

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #81 on: February 20, 2015, 07:36:58 PM »
To H2O's statement: I still do not see the advantages of DSD at all - can someone please enlighten me?  To me, unless you're making SACDs or keeping your DSD recording entirely in the DSD domain and using a DSD-capable DAC to listen to it, there's no point.  What am I missing?

Simple.  Better sound quality.  Period.  ...and yes you leave your files in DSD format and play them back in DSD format either on your D100, on a portable X3 or X5 player like I have, or connected to your computer through a DAC.  I'm still deciding how I ultimately want to archive, but at minimum it will be saving the master DSD files.  Right now I'm also saving the converted 24/48 files.

If you have no desire to bother with the higher quality files, then forget it, you get no benefit from DSD.  If you want to record music and squeeze another layer of great sound out of your live recordings...another layer of realism, then IMHO paying the extra $400 or $500 is probably worth it and you'll love DSD.  But keep in mind I've already got five grand in my bag, so adding another 10% for that extra layer of realism is definitely money well spent for my rig.  No it's not a black and white difference, but it's a definite step up. 

I was a bit skeptical, but the korg users were pretty universal.  Now I'm a believer as well.  This absolutely isn't snake oil.

Anyway, I'm playing most of my recordings on my Fiio X3 and I'm absolutely in love with it.

« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 07:40:34 PM by tonedeaf »

Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #82 on: February 20, 2015, 08:20:41 PM »
To H2O's statement: I still do not see the advantages of DSD at all - can someone please enlighten me?  To me, unless you're making SACDs or keeping your DSD recording entirely in the DSD domain and using a DSD-capable DAC to listen to it, there's no point.  What am I missing?

Simple.  Better sound quality.  Period.  ...and yes you leave your files in DSD format and play them back in DSD format either on your D100, on a portable X3 or X5 player like I have, or connected to your computer through a DAC.  I'm still deciding how I ultimately want to archive, but at minimum it will be saving the master DSD files.  Right now I'm also saving the converted 24/48 files.

If you have no desire to bother with the higher quality files, then forget it, you get no benefit from DSD.  If you want to record music and squeeze another layer of great sound out of your live recordings...another layer of realism, then IMHO paying the extra $400 or $500 is probably worth it and you'll love DSD.  But keep in mind I've already got five grand in my bag, so adding another 10% for that extra layer of realism is definitely money well spent for my rig.  No it's not a black and white difference, but it's a definite step up. 

I was a bit skeptical, but the korg users were pretty universal.  Now I'm a believer as well.  This absolutely isn't snake oil.

Anyway, I'm playing most of my recordings on my Fiio X3 and I'm absolutely in love with it.

Well I suppose if you can really hear the improvement then it's worth it to you.  I wasn't suggesting it's snake oil.  But it seems that many people out there (clearly not you) are unaware that their DACs / players don't decode DSD directly, and then what they are listening to is DSD transcoded to PCM and then out to the DAC.  Once you have to convert to PCM before you hear it - that's where it seems silly to me.  That, and the fact that you can't edit DSD without the software first converting to PCM, unless you're on a Pyramix system.  If you have the right equipment though, then it may certainly make sense to go DSD

I wonder if the high quality you are hearing has more to do with the D100 itself and its improved ADC / DAC rather than the DSD format.  I think I remember seeing a comp somewhere of the D100 at 24/192 vs. DSD, but I didn't bother listening as my DAC doesn't decode DSD - again, the DSD files would have to be converted by software to PCM to pass to my PCM-only DAC, so it wouldn't be a fair comparison.
DPA 4061 | Line Audio CM3 | Naiant X-Q
Naiant PFAs | Shure FP24
Tascam DR-70D JWMod | Sony PCM-M10

Tascam DR-70D FAQ
Team Line Audio
Quote
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.    ///    If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music.
- Gustav Mahler

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #83 on: February 20, 2015, 08:21:23 PM »
I'd buy a d100 and use an external pre any day of the week over the 702

DSD is fantastic - I just wish someone made a 6-8 channel DSD recorder

Also to add - I can't stand the pre-amps in the SD 7xx series

I owned both 702 and a Korg MR-1 and did some comparisons (Schoeps > PSP-2 > split to the 702 and MR-1 and the MR-1 always sounded better - better AD on the MR-1 when running DSD


 I ran the pre's of the 702 a number of times inside, outside, different caps and placements - only when running with the mk21's did I remotely like the sound being produced - I sold the 702 within 5 months of owning it because of this (pre's where no where near the quality of Grace, EAA, or Schoeps

Person I sold it too sold it shortly for the exact same reason

IMO SD 7xx series is not a worthy all in one
« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 11:23:29 PM by H₂O »
Remember Creationists are primates too... just a little less evolved
LMA Recordings

List

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #84 on: February 20, 2015, 09:03:15 PM »
I wonder if the high quality you are hearing has more to do with the D100 itself and its improved ADC / DAC rather than the DSD format.  I think I remember seeing a comp somewhere of the D100 at 24/192 vs. DSD, but I didn't bother listening as my DAC doesn't decode DSD - again, the DSD files would have to be converted by software to PCM to pass to my PCM-only DAC, so it wouldn't be a fair comparison.

Very valid questions.  Trying to answer the same questions when I first got the D100, I posted a comp.  Not too many people posted their impressions.  The samples compared an m10 at 24/48 against a d100 at 24/48.  Then I compared the m10 24/48 against the d100 at DSD but with the files converted back to 24/48.  Really not much difference could be heard, though there was some consensus that the converted DSD file had a very slightly better sound.  The main difference I could hear was in playing back the DSD file directly on my players. 

I recently bought a great priced D50.  I'm going to record multiple stages this summer.  :)  I'm kinda curious to see if the D50 sounds exactly like the M10.  I'm sure they've been comped here before...gotta do a search to see what I find.

« Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 09:07:44 PM by tonedeaf »

Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #85 on: February 20, 2015, 09:24:04 PM »
I wonder if the high quality you are hearing has more to do with the D100 itself and its improved ADC / DAC rather than the DSD format.  I think I remember seeing a comp somewhere of the D100 at 24/192 vs. DSD, but I didn't bother listening as my DAC doesn't decode DSD - again, the DSD files would have to be converted by software to PCM to pass to my PCM-only DAC, so it wouldn't be a fair comparison.

Very valid questions.  Trying to answer the same questions when I first got the D100, I posted a comp.  Not too many people posted their impressions.  The samples compared an m10 at 24/48 against a d100 at 24/48.  Then I compared the m10 24/48 against the d100 at DSD but with the files converted back to 24/48.  Really not much difference could be heard, though there was some consensus that the converted DSD file had a very slightly better sound.  The main difference I could hear was in playing back the DSD file directly on my players. 

I recently bought a great priced D50.  I'm going to record multiple stages this summer.  :)  I'm kinda curious to see if the D50 sounds exactly like the M10.  I'm sure they've been comped here before...gotta do a search to see what I find.

There's the rub I guess - unless you have a DAC that directly decodes DSD you really can't make a true comparison between formats.  For instance, I'm pretty sure the X3 doesn't decode DSD, but the X5 does, so there could theoretically be a difference in sound between the original DSD played on the X5 and the converted PCM played on the X3.  I have downloaded some DSD / DFF files and listened on my computer using Foobar, and they sound no different than high-rate PCM.  But Foobar is just decoding and resampling to 24/96 PCM to pass to my DAC so unless I shell out for a much more expensive DAC, I'll never hear true DSD.

Having used both the D50 for quite a while and then the M10, I think they sound pretty much the same, at least for line-in.  The D50 has far superior built-in mics, but the M10 beats it in size, weight, battery usage, etc.  The D50 is a really great unit though.
DPA 4061 | Line Audio CM3 | Naiant X-Q
Naiant PFAs | Shure FP24
Tascam DR-70D JWMod | Sony PCM-M10

Tascam DR-70D FAQ
Team Line Audio
Quote
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.    ///    If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music.
- Gustav Mahler

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #86 on: February 20, 2015, 11:16:10 PM »
Comparisons between m10, d50 and d100  with the same external preamp would be interesting.

Offline jbell

  • TDS
  • Trade Count: (127)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3736
  • Gender: Male
  • Spreadicated
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #87 on: February 21, 2015, 08:03:50 AM »
The X3 can play DSD files!  It was included in the firmware update!  The X5 requires a firmware update to play DSD as well.  So if one resamples I would assume they both resample.  Nothing I have read suggest they don't decode the DSD files

I wonder if the high quality you are hearing has more to do with the D100 itself and its improved ADC / DAC rather than the DSD format.  I think I remember seeing a comp somewhere of the D100 at 24/192 vs. DSD, but I didn't bother listening as my DAC doesn't decode DSD - again, the DSD files would have to be converted by software to PCM to pass to my PCM-only DAC, so it wouldn't be a fair comparison.

Very valid questions.  Trying to answer the same questions when I first got the D100, I posted a comp.  Not too many people posted their impressions.  The samples compared an m10 at 24/48 against a d100 at 24/48.  Then I compared the m10 24/48 against the d100 at DSD but with the files converted back to 24/48.  Really not much difference could be heard, though there was some consensus that the converted DSD file had a very slightly better sound.  The main difference I could hear was in playing back the DSD file directly on my players. 

I recently bought a great priced D50.  I'm going to record multiple stages this summer.  :)  I'm kinda curious to see if the D50 sounds exactly like the M10.  I'm sure they've been comped here before...gotta do a search to see what I find.

There's the rub I guess - unless you have a DAC that directly decodes DSD you really can't make a true comparison between formats.  For instance, I'm pretty sure the X3 doesn't decode DSD, but the X5 does, so there could theoretically be a difference in sound between the original DSD played on the X5 and the converted PCM played on the X3.  I have downloaded some DSD / DFF files and listened on my computer using Foobar, and they sound no different than high-rate PCM.  But Foobar is just decoding and resampling to 24/96 PCM to pass to my DAC so unless I shell out for a much more expensive DAC, I'll never hear true DSD.

Having used both the D50 for quite a while and then the M10, I think they sound pretty much the same, at least for line-in.  The D50 has far superior built-in mics, but the M10 beats it in size, weight, battery usage, etc.  The D50 is a really great unit though.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2015, 08:27:31 AM by jbell »
Schoeps MK4's, MK41's> KCY 250/5 Ig> Schoeps VMS 5U> Sony PCM-M10

Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #88 on: February 21, 2015, 05:40:39 PM »
The X3 can play DSD files!  It was included in the firmware update!  The X5 requires a firmware update to play DSD as well.  So if one resamples I would assume they both resample.  Nothing I have read suggest they don't decode the DSD files

Ahh, didn't know they did that - good to know.  B&H was showing the X3 as discontinued and didn't mention anything about DSD, but I knew the X5 supported it.
DPA 4061 | Line Audio CM3 | Naiant X-Q
Naiant PFAs | Shure FP24
Tascam DR-70D JWMod | Sony PCM-M10

Tascam DR-70D FAQ
Team Line Audio
Quote
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.    ///    If a composer could say what he had to say in words he would not bother trying to say it in music.
- Gustav Mahler

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #89 on: February 21, 2015, 05:53:23 PM »
Apparently still in stock at Adorama.

How do you edit DSD?  Looks Reaper, for example, won't work with DSD. 

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #90 on: February 21, 2015, 06:22:01 PM »
Apparently still in stock at Adorama.

How do you edit DSD?  Looks Reaper, for example, won't work with DSD.

Korg's free version of Audiogate has some basic functionality for normalizing files and converting to PCM.  There are a number of high end software packages out there, such as Pyramix.  Older unlicensed versions are floating around.

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #91 on: February 21, 2015, 06:23:02 PM »
Korg audiogate gives you basic editing functions

- changing levels
- tracking
- copying between channels

Pyramix is the main program
Remember Creationists are primates too... just a little less evolved
LMA Recordings

List

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #92 on: February 22, 2015, 09:00:20 AM »
Some of the discussion in this thread had me thinking, so I did a personal comp last night.  I took my favorite DSD recorded song from a recent Lotus show and saved it in 24/196 and 24/48 using Audiogate to do the conversion.  Then I transferred the DSD, 24/196, and 24/48 files to both my D100 and my Fiio X3 to have a listen.

After converting to 24/196, the PCM file is a larger file than the DSD file by about 50%.  Even after I FLACed the file, it was still larger than the DSD file.

My listening setup was my headphone rig...the D100 or Fiio X3 headphone jack >  PanAm tube-based headphone amp > Sennheiser HD700 headphones.  Not the best, but certainly a higher end sound reproduction system.

I didn't spend much time comping the sound produced from the two devices.  They both sound outstanding and were really close, but if I had to choose I thought the X3 sounded just slightly better than the D100.

I was a little surprised by how much better the DSD and 24/196 sound over the 24/48 files.  Of course, the result is expected, but given all of the discussion over the years here on ts.com about how you don't get much from higher sample rates, I didn't expect to hear as much of a difference as I heard.  Better overall clarity and depth is heard in the higher resolution files, especially in the lows. 

The DSD and 24/196 files are close, but the DSD file is the fairly clear winner over the 24/196 PCM file.  The DSD file has a cleaner presentation and overall more 'I'm back at the show' feel to it.  The soundstage and overall air you hear is better on the DSD files. 

One of these days, I'll do a similar comp, except change the sample rates at capture.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2015, 09:08:42 AM by tonedeaf »

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #93 on: February 22, 2015, 08:12:33 PM »
I think it has to do with transient response - based the fact the when sound is generate from many sources at many points in space all wave forms of sound begin at different points in time and the brain can subtily sense this based on the complexities of the structure of the ear - and the fact you have 2 ears
« Last Edit: February 23, 2015, 07:43:46 PM by H₂O »
Remember Creationists are primates too... just a little less evolved
LMA Recordings

List

Offline Jonmac

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #94 on: February 23, 2015, 09:43:40 AM »
I saw a news report the other day saying that Sony are considering dropping the manufacture of many of their products to concentrate on their Film and Play Station divisions.

This could mean that they no longer produce audio recorders, so look after your kit.
Zoom H1, Zoom H2, Zoom H6, Tascam DR-40, Tascam Dr-05, Homebrew mic's, C2 Cardioids

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #95 on: February 23, 2015, 07:20:40 PM »
On the one hand, Sony released the D100 with DSD ability and they've also recently announced some pricey audio memory card.  I'd be surprised if Sony discontinued these products.  If anything, I'd say Sony may be trying to gain some ground for its DSD format by releasing the D100. 

Except for Audiogate, looks like DSD capable editing software is rather pricey.  Between the recorder, software and a DSD capable player, you could spend quite a bit.   

Offline Jonmac

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #96 on: February 24, 2015, 11:37:17 AM »
Sonys position in the market seems very strange to me, they produce very high end Camcorders and video cameras, used by many TV companies, but they don't make a truly professional audio recorder, (XLR inputs, Time code etc).

The D100 and M10 only appear on the Sony professional web site so it would appear that they are aimed at that market, but they are not really suitable for use as anything other than a backup recorder.

As for DSD, no one seems sure what to do with it, the pro video people don't use it, as their editing software cant handle it, ( I speak from experience ) and video sound ends up as 16 or 24 bit/48k anyway.
Zoom H1, Zoom H2, Zoom H6, Tascam DR-40, Tascam Dr-05, Homebrew mic's, C2 Cardioids

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #97 on: February 24, 2015, 12:32:48 PM »
Hopefully we are still on topic with D100:)  Actually this would apply to most all consumer digital audio products.  I tried recording digi in to the D100 from my oppo bdp-100 blu ray with the hope of upsampling with the Sony.
:((  That crummy scms / prevented the copy.
I'm wondering if it would still defeat a copy if a macbook was the source. Im going to pick up a dual 3.5mm toslink and see what happens...any experiences?

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #98 on: February 24, 2015, 12:41:15 PM »

:((  That crummy scms / prevented the copy.


Are you sure it was SCMS bit that is incompatible and not the SPDIF 'word' format that is the issue?  I have a D100 but I don't intend to use its digital input capabilities, but back when I wanted to use the digi-input on the D50, it was only compatible with the more restrictive SPDIF standard, so it wouldn't play nicely with most of the digital devices on the market at the time the D50 was released.  This issue comes up every now and then on taperssection and I can never remember the specific explanation, but a search of history would provide the necessary details.

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #99 on: February 24, 2015, 12:53:34 PM »
thanks tone deaf I'll check previous threads. The d100  meters display the dig signal, however the unit remains locked in rec/pause mode with "no digital".

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #100 on: February 24, 2015, 12:58:20 PM »
As for DSD, no one seems sure what to do with it, the pro video people don't use it, as their editing software cant handle it, ( I speak from experience ) and video sound ends up as 16 or 24 bit/48k anyway.

I never knew how to spell DSD before I bought a D100 in November, so my knowledge is limited, but in my brief period of research, I'm independently reaching the same conclusion...that the future of DSD is uncertain at best.  Even as a hobbyist, I unwilling to commit to it as the root of my recording medium going forward.
 
That said, I'm more than happy to enjoy the format through playback of super excellent quality recordings I'm getting in DSD format.  I'll keep doing it and saving my DSD sources alongside 24/196 PCM masters that are immediately achievable for free with Audiogate. 

The most amazing thing to me is being able to put these highest possible quality recordings onto micro SD card and play them back natively in a pocket unit (via Fiio X3 or X5) through a pair of $400 Sennheiser IEMs that I can take with me anywhere I go!  That alone is worth the commitment to DSD for my music loving dollar, but then I've spent a large percentage of my life jonesing for a high-end audiophile system and I've resigned myself that this might be the closest I'll ever come.  Given what I'm hearing on my system and the fact that I'd need to move out before my wife would let me play audiophile gear at the volumes I'd want to play, I'm OK with that.

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #101 on: February 24, 2015, 01:12:23 PM »
thanks tone deaf I'll check previous threads. The d100  meters display the dig signal, however the unit remains locked in rec/pause mode with "no digital".

Sounds like that might be your issue.  If you search back in the D50's history in the recorders forum, I think the technical explanation is somewhere back there.  It has something to do with that when the SPDIF standard was first developed by Sony/Phillips (the 's' and the 'p' in S/PDIF), the standard implemented throughout the industry was a little bit different than the strict compliance with the standard as defined by Sony/Phillips.  So when Sony created a device with a digital input (e.g. the D50) and then designed the device with the stricter definition, that immediately meant that the D50 wasn't going to be able to 'talk' to those older devices.  So for example, I bought a D50 thinking I'd use the digi input on the D50 from the optical output of an opti-mod mini-me, but they aren't compatible with each other.  V3's are only compatible if they've had a mod in which they install a new chip.  Apparently, some newer devices are now compatible with the Sony, but it's never a given that the Sony will be compatible with the standard installed in the newer digital device.  Sony COULD resolve this situation for customers if they'd stop designing their recorders with the more restrictive standard, but apparently they won't do that.  Thanks alot Sony!

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #102 on: February 24, 2015, 01:54:04 PM »
agreed .. thanks Tone!

Offline birdboy01

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #103 on: February 27, 2015, 10:55:36 AM »
Im looking to sell my Sony PCM-D100. Is it ok to post here?
I didn't see a classified section..

thanks
Mike

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #104 on: February 27, 2015, 11:21:39 AM »
There's a Yard Sale at the bottom of the page where you can sell it.

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #105 on: March 25, 2015, 12:10:37 PM »

As for DSD, no one seems sure what to do with it

As well as making really great live recordings, it's a good archiving format for analog tapes. I've read that some users think of DSD like you would an analog master tape of a final mix: next step is analog out.

play them back natively in a pocket unit (via Fiio X3 or X5)

I think that those units, the Fiio X3 and the X5, have to convert the DSD to PCM for playback. But the new X3 2nd generation will play DSD natively (including .iso files).

"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline adrianb

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #106 on: September 22, 2015, 03:20:39 PM »
Has anybody used the D100 in  >:D situations?

The reason I ask is that I've just tested the PIP with a voltmeter, and was quite surprised to discover that the output is 5v.

Is this enough to power some popular mics in loud situations? If it is I could imagine I might be more comfortable using this on it's own with some mics, rather than the smaller M10 with an additional battery box. I'll give it a try shortly.

I can confirm that the internal microphones on the D100 are rubbish for loud sounds, this is my go to recorder for ambient sounds.

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #107 on: September 22, 2015, 03:53:30 PM »
@adrianb: I've used the D100 with an EV RE20, Shure 7B, and other mics demanding high gain. Zero problems. I don't remember the exact setup off the top of my head, but I used nothing but the mic, cable, and D100. I was testing with things like the EV RE20 just for fun. But it gives you the idea that you can use it with a wide range of mics.

Online beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #108 on: September 22, 2015, 08:37:51 PM »
Hmm 5 volts,thats interesting.What do you get for a reading on the M10 pip?You could be onto something as recently i was running D100 for Steve Miller and using Countryman b3 direct to PIP because my battery box wasnt working properly and there is no distortion on that recording.If thats the case i believe Dpa 4061 run on 5 volts.
Mics: Sennheiser mke2,AT 933's(c)(h),Soundman OKM II Rock Studio,Sonic Studios DSM-6SL,Countryman B3,CA-14 (O) , CA-14 (C) , Aiwa CM30,Shure mv88
Pre's: PA3SX-U , CA-9200 ,  CA-UGLY II
BBox:PA-6LC3B , CA-UBB (x 3) , AC3
Decks: Sony PCM M10 (x 2)  , Tascam dr-2d

VIDEO : Sony FDR AX100 (4k) , Sony FX 1000 ( 3CMOS )
PHOTO : 7D x2 , 1DMK4 , Fujifilm X100T ( Canon EF 400mm F4 DO, Canon EF 500 F4 L ,Canon EF Extender 2x II,1.4xIII, 2x lll

A/V software: SONY VEGAS PRO 9.0e  -SONY VEGAS PRO 13,DVD Architect 5.0b

Offline adrianb

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #109 on: September 23, 2015, 04:36:04 AM »
Hmm 5 volts,thats interesting.What do you get for a reading on the M10 pip?You could be onto something as recently i was running D100 for Steve Miller and using Countryman b3 direct to PIP because my battery box wasnt working properly and there is no distortion on that recording.If thats the case i believe Dpa 4061 run on 5 volts.

I measured the PIP output on the M10 at 3v. I was expecting the D100 to be the same, which is why I was quite surprised to find it was 5v.

 

Offline dabbler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #110 on: October 10, 2015, 03:57:23 AM »
What input level do you guys use for running DPA 4061s directly off the D100 PiP?  Roughly how loud and how far from the stage do you record at?

I've been using DPA 4063s (no BB) with mic-in with levels 1.8 to 2.0 off the M10.  These input levels are on the low side and probably not optimal for the M10.  I can still overload the input in some loud situations and may risk preamp distortion if I run lower levels.  So I wonder if I'll be better off with the 4061s directly into the D100 if I'm recording post-rock / metal shows at stage lip.

My interest in the D100 over the M10 comes from two factors:

1) eliminating a battery box and extra cable as a possible point of failure for 4061s

2) increased dynamic range over the M10.  I mostly record amplified rock shows, but occasionally there'll be an acoustic set in the middle or a quiet opening act.  I don't like to fiddle around with levels during a show in the dark (my night vision is poor).  With increased DR at stage lip, I might also be able to pick up on details like the musician's foot tapping (or farting ;D)

Biggest downsides is increased price and size.

Offline adrianb

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #111 on: October 10, 2015, 03:28:07 PM »
What input level do you guys use for running DPA 4061s directly off the D100 PiP?  Roughly how loud and how far from the stage do you record at?

I'm new to this 'game' having only using my recorders for nature sounds previously, but waiting for a s*** load of stuff from Chris Church to get me really going.

Recorded my first concert proper last week with some AT853's(4.7k Mod) bought here plugged directly into Mic In (with PIP no battery box) on the D100 with the levels set at 3. Like you I'm not comfortable playing with levels, so set it conservatively having played in front of my hi-fi with the volume high.

I was in the second row, and it was a moderately loud indie band. I think it would have been okay with the levels set at 4, but really pleased with the results.

Offline dabbler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #112 on: October 15, 2015, 03:56:59 AM »
adrianb: I assume your MIC ATT switch was at 20 and not 0?

My biggest gripe with my DPA 4063 > M10 (no BB) combo is the lack of usable input range on the M10 when using mic-in.  This is while using the low-sensitivity switch on the M10.

DPA 4061 > D100 (no BB) could be my ideal omni setup for stage lip recordings.
I can see the D100 alone being roughly the same size as an M10 + BB + extra cable.

DPA 4061s are also plentiful on the secondary market, while the DPA 4063 is hard-to-find used.

Offline adrianb

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #113 on: October 15, 2015, 04:57:19 PM »
adrianb: I assume your MIC ATT switch was at 20 and not 0?

No, it never moves from 0.

Online beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #114 on: October 15, 2015, 06:50:40 PM »
I think you just got lucky if your recording wasnt distorted if you didnt use the -20 att switch but maybe im missing something.
Mics: Sennheiser mke2,AT 933's(c)(h),Soundman OKM II Rock Studio,Sonic Studios DSM-6SL,Countryman B3,CA-14 (O) , CA-14 (C) , Aiwa CM30,Shure mv88
Pre's: PA3SX-U , CA-9200 ,  CA-UGLY II
BBox:PA-6LC3B , CA-UBB (x 3) , AC3
Decks: Sony PCM M10 (x 2)  , Tascam dr-2d

VIDEO : Sony FDR AX100 (4k) , Sony FX 1000 ( 3CMOS )
PHOTO : 7D x2 , 1DMK4 , Fujifilm X100T ( Canon EF 400mm F4 DO, Canon EF 500 F4 L ,Canon EF Extender 2x II,1.4xIII, 2x lll

A/V software: SONY VEGAS PRO 9.0e  -SONY VEGAS PRO 13,DVD Architect 5.0b

Offline dabbler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #115 on: October 18, 2015, 07:41:37 PM »
DPA 4061 > D100 (no BB) with the Mic Att switch at 20 and input level @ 3 seems to work well for stage lip recording of an experimental post-metal band.

I just did two shows (open taping!) with the D100 and head-baffled 4061s compared to the dozens, maybe hundreds with the M10 by now.

The lockable input knob is great and is easier to see/adjust than the M10.  The unit boots up quickly and USB 2.0 transfers much more quickly than the USB 1.1 on the M10.  I've found the M10 microSD card slot too frustrating to align properly so I leave the microSD in the M10.

What I don't like about the D100 compared to the M10:

1. The Hold switch does not lock the power switch, making it easy to turn off accidentally.  I'm used to the M10 which has a combined power/hold switch, and I can more easily operate it by touch without taking it out of my pocket.
This is my biggest frustration with the D100.
The M10 is not easy to turn off: a good thing!


2. Hold switch prevents the backlight from coming up at all.  The light is completely innocuous and possibly cannot damage a recording (unlike the power switch), yet Sony decided to have Hold protect the light and not the power switch!  WTF!?

With the M10, I can touch a button, wait a few seconds for the Hold warning to clear, and peek down my pocket to check levels without disturbing anyone else.  This is not something I'd be comfortable doing with the D100 given the idiotic Hold switch implementation.


3. Unlike the M10, having the Hold switch engaged does not prevent the PiP toggle dialog from popping up when I plug in my mics.  It will prompt the user and force them to disable Hold.  The M10 remembers the PiP setting when the Hold switch is engaged.  I can work around this by turning the unit off before plugging in the mics.


4. The mic-in jack is on the side, making it more susceptible to strain when placed in a pocket.  For open taping, I used the bundled carrying-case worn on my belt so it was not an issue.  This is with a right-angle 1/8" Neutrik to terminate my 4061s.


Other notes:
The 5 second pre-record buffer is awesome on both recorders compared to the R-09 I used before.  A 10 second pre-record would be even better :)

Unlike the M10, the D100 runs Linux.  I've dabbled in Linux kernel development, but Sony seems to have locked down the ability to manually install software despite distributing the sources:

   http://oss.sony.net/Products/Linux/Audio/PCM-D100.html

Offline jibanes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #116 on: August 29, 2016, 06:41:47 PM »
From reading the manual, the PCM-D100, unlike the M10; can't do auto rec volume, what is the alternative; set the level "reasonably" and to the rest post processing?

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #117 on: August 29, 2016, 06:57:55 PM »
From reading the manual, the PCM-D100, unlike the M10; can't do auto rec volume, what is the alternative; set the level "reasonably" and to the rest post processing?

... and use the Limiter.
"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline jibanes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #118 on: August 29, 2016, 08:11:00 PM »
Any advice on setting the "base" recording level? Or just watch the needles?
Finally another completely unrelated question, if using the optical cord and "line sync rec" does it stops when it encounter the end of the track? Or just start in sync with the input (digital) signal?

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #119 on: August 30, 2016, 12:19:44 AM »
Any advice on setting the "base" recording level?

I found that leaving the level at 4.0 worked in most circumstances.
"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline jibanes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #120 on: August 30, 2016, 05:03:10 AM »
Is there any "golden" rule, such as, in (film) photography we have the "sunny 16" rule, which is:

if your film is x iso (i.e. x=400 iso); and you're shooting at daylight with no clouds, then your shutter speed should be 1/x seconds (here 1/400 seconds) and aperture f/16.

Is there such rule for audio (especially with the sony pcm-d100) i.e. if you're recording voice, then set the recording level to the number of meters between the recorder and the subject... or something like that?

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #121 on: August 30, 2016, 12:02:53 PM »
Is there any "golden" rule, such as, in (film) photography we have the "sunny 16" rule, which is:

if your film is x iso (i.e. x=400 iso); and you're shooting at daylight with no clouds, then your shutter speed should be 1/x seconds (here 1/400 seconds) and aperture f/16.

Is there such rule for audio (especially with the sony pcm-d100) i.e. if you're recording voice, then set the recording level to the number of meters between the recorder and the subject... or something like that?

The recording level controls vary from one recorder to another. You have to experiment with the one you use and try to do trial recordings before the session.

Further to your earlier question about auto record levels, if you have the D100 set at 4.0 and the subject is still too loud, you can also use the MIC ATT switch.

And if you record at 24 bit, a low volume recording can be raised in post with less noise resulting.
"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline mitchellm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #122 on: August 30, 2016, 12:33:26 PM »
Recording level also depends on whether you are using the in-built mics vs. using an external mic. 

Overall the D100 records extremely cleanly. Especially if you are using 24 bit. This means if you raise the volume in post that you won't also be increasing self-noise.

Offline adrianb

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #123 on: August 30, 2016, 01:50:18 PM »
I have never used the Auto Level feature on any recorder I have owned. If the Sony PCM-D100 had this feature it would be redundant. I use mine for nature and ambient sounds, and it's invariably set to 4.

My experience with the internal mics are that they are excellent for what I use it for, perhaps the best on any portable recorder, but useless for loud music.

Offline jibanes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #124 on: August 30, 2016, 06:35:10 PM »
This is very useful, thank you.

Regarding optical "synchronizing recording with playback" (aka "Digital Synchronized Recording"); I can't figure out, reading page 43 of the documentation, if the recording stops (even after a few seconds) when the signal (playback) ends.

Offline dabbler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #125 on: August 30, 2016, 11:29:41 PM »
From what I recall, the limiter is not compatible with the 100dB+ SNR feature; so you're probably better off setting a lower level anyways and leaving the limiter off.

With the 100dB+ SNR, you can bump the levels in post with less noise, whereas the limiter may engage in a way which is noticeable with a volume jump.

In other words, it seemed to me that the limiter is implemented using the 100dB SNR feature internally; but using 12dB or so of that as a buffer zone for the limiter.

For reference, I used level 3 with Mic ATT at -20 doing PiP via mic-out
with DPA 4061s.  No battery box, attenuators, or anything in between; just stereo DPA4061s directly into the D100.  Anyways I returned the D100 since it
did not seem to be worth the bulk + weight over my M10 + BB combo (using a lightweight rechargeable 8.4V Li-ion for the BB).

Offline barihunk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #126 on: October 03, 2016, 06:46:34 PM »
Hi all... So I have a question that I've been googling around all day with no good answer. If I want to use proper phantom powered mics with the D100, what's the best way to go about it? The XLR adapter by Sony is expensive and hard to find, and I've gotten conflicting posts about whether the Denecke PS-2 power supply will destroy the mic in of the D100. Going to the USBPre is a bit of an overkill (might as well just bring a laptop).

Have I covered all the options already?

Offline mnm207

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #127 on: October 03, 2016, 08:03:49 PM »
I use a MixPre (not the MixPre-D) in front of a D100 for my XLR mics (with and without phantom powering). I bought it initially to use in front of an M10 as it seemed a straightforward and flexible tool for this. Using it in front of a D100, one might see its lack of a digital out such as the USBPre2 or MixPre-D have as a downside, but it otherwise remains a straightforward and flexible way to use phantom powered mics (or any other mic with an XLR connection) with the D100.

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #128 on: October 04, 2016, 09:13:55 AM »
Hi all... So I have a question that I've been googling around all day with no good answer. If I want to use proper phantom powered mics with the D100, what's the best way to go about it? The XLR adapter by Sony is expensive and hard to find, and I've gotten conflicting posts about whether the Denecke PS-2 power supply will destroy the mic in of the D100. Going to the USBPre is a bit of an overkill (might as well just bring a laptop).

Have I covered all the options already?

I've been using a Beachtek DXA-6 for phantom power in front of my D100, going MIC IN into the D100 with no ill effects. The Beachtek runs on a single 9V battery so you don't get a lot of mobile running time. But because I do a lot of recording of trains near my house, I have hooked up this cable to the DXA-6 so I can use an AC adapter:

https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B000EELID0/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline jibanes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #129 on: October 04, 2016, 12:27:35 PM »
Nice, how much battery time this gives you?

Offline dogmusic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 553
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #130 on: October 04, 2016, 04:23:19 PM »
Nice, how much battery time this gives you?

If I remember correctly, the Beachtek with phantom power on gave me about 3 1/2 to 4 hours running time on a 9V battery.
"The ear is much more than a mere appendage on the side of the head." - Catherine Parker Anthony, Structure and Function of the Human Body (1972)

"That's metaphysically absurd, man! How can I know what you hear?" - Firesign Theatre

Offline taug

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #131 on: October 06, 2016, 02:21:01 PM »
There's been a big price drop on the PCM-D100 at our favorite online shopping giant.  :o

Offline MakersMarc

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1438
  • Gender: Male
  • Dust of long dead stars is what we are.
Re: Sony PCM-D100 Part2
« Reply #132 on: January 22, 2017, 08:01:45 PM »
Which is who?
Mk4v/41v>Nbob kcy x2>nbox platinum/Naiant PFA/Naiant IPA>Oade warm mod Marantz 661 x2/Sony pcm m10x2

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 1.286 seconds with 155 queries.
© 2002-2017 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF
Website Design by Foxtrot Media, Inc., a Baltimore Website Company