Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Tascam DR-40?  (Read 4229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fendrin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Tascam DR-40?
« on: December 29, 2015, 11:20:51 PM »
So I'm brand spanking new to taping, and I just want to see what peoples' opinions are on this particular model.
Is it worth buying? Is there a cheaper alternative that has xlr inputs? Would the on-board microphones offer good enough quality, or should I get some mics to put in?

Offline Sonus Captor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2015, 04:31:59 AM »
As far as I know the DR-40 is the cheapest recorder on the market with xlr inputs. It's a solid performer for the price, but the DR-60 (no built-in mics) and the DR-70 (built-in omnidirectional mics) have much quieter mic preamps than the DR-40 or the Zoom H4n. Here's an audio test of the Tascam DR-70D vs. Zoom H4n vs. Tascam DR-40: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5tGpKlNxhI
Hope this helps.

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2015, 07:41:41 AM »
Maybe I am missing something, but why would you want a deck with XLRs if you intend to use internal mics?  Kind of opposite ends of the spectrum.  Generally, I think the mics are the most important (gear) choice as far as quality goes, so I would think about that before trying to figure out the recorder...

Personally, I would also avoid the DR-70D, as there have been some issues (see the DR-70D thread).

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2015, 12:09:09 PM »
I owned a DR-40. Unlike other Trashcan products it generally worked well, though it seemed a bit finicky about formatting the card (it would do it, but sometimes it wouldn't exit the format process correctly). I recorded a couple shows with the internals - the "Busy Bee" show is with them. http://www.nyctaper.com/2012/09/william-tyler-september-6-and-7-2012-hopscotch-festival-2-performances-flac-mp3-streaming/

It really depends on your application. The main issue with internal mics is often placement. If you can optimally place the recorder so that those mics are at the appropriate height, centered to the source, etc, they aren't bad. The DR-40 also lets you adjust the angle of the mics, which is nice.

The XLR inputs work perfectly well, though I found them a little "hot" -- meaning if you plan to record a lot of very loud sources, you may need outboard attenuators (a $15 part) to prevent it from overloading.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline fendrin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2016, 03:30:09 AM »
Thanks for the feedback, all. Just to confirm, for less than 4 hours at a time of recording at max quality (96 kHz/24 bit), judging from the chart, I'll need at least an 8 gb card (i'll probably get a 16 gig to be safe)
« Last Edit: January 03, 2016, 03:37:31 AM by fendrin »

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2016, 11:32:20 AM »
Thanks for the feedback, all. Just to confirm, for less than 4 hours at a time of recording at max quality (96 kHz/24 bit), judging from the chart, I'll need at least an 8 gb card (i'll probably get a 16 gig to be safe)
Why on earth would you record at 24/96 ever, but especially with a DR-40, and even more especially with its internal mics?

24/48 is the standard of most people here for a reason, and IMHO it is overkill. There are plenty of longer threads about this topic that can be located without us rehashing them here, but for the kinds of ultra-pro applications where 24/96 is even defensible (recording hummingbird wings flapping for a Hollywood film? transferring high-value old analog recordings for official release?) you'd first of all not be using a budget Tascam recorder, and second, you probably wouldn't be in need of advice from this forum...
« Last Edit: January 05, 2016, 08:55:59 PM by acidjack »
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2016, 11:06:37 AM »
16g Sdhc cards are so cheap that it doesn't make sense to buy 8g


Offline lsd2525

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3399
  • Gender: Male
  • Eschew obfuscation
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2016, 10:22:46 AM »
16g Sdhc cards are so cheap that it doesn't make sense to buy 8g

It's about to the point that 32g cards are so cheap that it doesn't make sense to buy 16g  :)
Mics: SKM184's; ADK A51s; AT4041; Superlux S502; CK91 active w/homebrew BB; AT853; Naiant X-X; Nak 300's
Recorders: M10; DR-60D; DR-701D

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2016, 12:33:56 PM »
I agree, especially if you leave a lot of stuff on your card.

Offline billydee

  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Gender: Male
Re: Tascam DR-40?
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2016, 12:01:33 PM »
I owned a DR-40. Unlike other Trashcan products it generally worked well, though it seemed a bit finicky about formatting the card (it would do it, but sometimes it wouldn't exit the format process correctly). I recorded a couple shows with the internals - the "Busy Bee" show is with them. http://www.nyctaper.com/2012/09/william-tyler-september-6-and-7-2012-hopscotch-festival-2-performances-flac-mp3-streaming/

It really depends on your application. The main issue with internal mics is often placement. If you can optimally place the recorder so that those mics are at the appropriate height, centered to the source, etc, they aren't bad. The DR-40 also lets you adjust the angle of the mics, which is nice.

The XLR inputs work perfectly well, though I found them a little "hot" -- meaning if you plan to record a lot of very loud sources, you may need outboard attenuators (a $15 part) to prevent it from overloading.
I now own the DR-40 referenced above by acidjack and can back up what he's mentioned word for word. It's not my go to deck but has worked flawlessly when I've needed it and I have made several excellent sounding matrix recordings with it when I was able to get a soundboard feed and get the deck/internals setup in the right spot.

Here's a link to one of them on LMA- https://archive.org/details/grantfarm2015-03-28.matrix.flac16

And for what it's worth, I only record at 16/44 with this deck and at the same rate 95% of the time for my primary deck.

« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 12:04:10 PM by billydee »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 38 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF