Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Fostex FR2le and Shure VP88  (Read 2962 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline batface

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Fostex FR2le and Shure VP88
« on: May 25, 2007, 10:07:01 PM »
Hi,

I'm a post-production sound editor, and would like to purchase a portable rig for sound gathering—Nature ambiences, non-sync Foley, FX, etc. My short list is the Korg MR-1000, Tascam HD-P2, and Fostex FR2le. The latter is currently my top contender, as you may have deduced from the Subject line (The Korg looks very sexy, and I like that it records at high sample/bit rates. But how do you edit 1-bit? I called Korg tech-support and their solution was to down-convert, which in my opinion defeats the purpose of recording to 1-bit. May as well record to 96/24, which is the highest res I can edit using Pro Tools LE. The Tascam has Timecode options, but I don't need that, not a location recordist for film). I'm a fan of Rudy Trubitt, and he recommends the Shure VP88 as a good all-round Stereo Mic. It records in mid-side config. I have 2 questions:
• How does the Fostex compare to the other 2 units? Does anyone have any insight?
• If the Shure is recording MS, how does it encode the information. My understanding of MS is that one capsule captures the center information, while the other, figure 8 capsule, captures the side info. When decoding, you need 3 tracks, two for the side info, and one for the center. For mono compatability, one of the side channels can have it's phase reversed, thus collapsing the stereo image to mono. If I'm recording to two tracks, how does that work? Do I not get the option after the fact to work with the stereo image? Should I be looking at other mic options?

Thanks for any and all answers…

 :)

Offline muj

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1505
  • Gender: Male
  • Certifiable Nevaton Fluffer
Re: Fostex FR2le and Shure VP88
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2007, 10:37:37 PM »
it's an honour to have you here. ;D

the shure microphone is noisy and i am not even sure it has a figure 8 capsule.

there are several other MS mic options but depends how much you want to invest.

I know the Sanken MS mics is very much regarded and respected in the U.S film circle,but in the u.k and here in norway as well.

Offline guysonic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1366
  • WISDOM FOR ALL TIMES
    • Sonic Studios DSM Stereo-Surround Microphone Systems
Re: Fostex FR2le and Shure VP88
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2007, 11:19:46 PM »
Many sound designers are using my company's HRTF baffled omni type microphone for recording film/game sounds as many feel it provides the most consistently realistic and usable results in all ambient conditions.  See this page for sound designer credits www.sonicstudios.com/cinema.htm  and sample sounds using various models of this type of mic at: www.sonicstudios.com/mp3.htm

Fostex FR-2LE seems to have THE most quiet and usable internal mic preamplifier compared to the other choices so a natural sounds recordist may not require using an external mic preamplifier with this particular deck.

"mics? I no got no mics!  Besides, I no have to show you no stink'n mics!" stxxlth taper's disclaimer

DSM HRTF STEREO-SURROUND RECORDING SYSTEMS WEBSITE: http://www.sonicstudios.com

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 24 queries.
© 2002-2017 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF
Website Design by Foxtrot Media, Inc., a Baltimore Website Company