Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Reducing audience chatter in post  (Read 401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline waltmon

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1714
  • Gender: Male
Reducing audience chatter in post
« on: April 19, 2017, 10:37:48 AM »
With a solid recording - is it possible to reduce audible chatter in post? Got a solid recording of Bob Weir last evening...would be nice to reduce the chatter a bit if possible.



Thanks
U89s, KM140's, 483's, V2, 744T(SSD)

CA-14 > UBB > Tascam DR-2D

ISO: KM-150's or AK50 capsules & 1 pound non-sequencial $50.00 bills

Offline hoserama

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
Re: Reducing audience chatter in post
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2017, 11:06:40 AM »
Manual spectral repair work. I've found Izotope RX to be the best at it. But you'll have to manually identify the offending frequencies, there's no plug-in for "less crowd"
Audio: AT943 + SBD feeds
Antennas: Lots of those
Cables: Lots of those
Recorders: Cymatic Utrack24, Cymatic LR16, RME Multiface, (2) Tascam 680, (2) Tascam 2D, Zoom H6, Zoom H4n, and a graveyard of irivers/nomads/minidiscs.

Offline capnhook

  • All your llamas are belong to us....
  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3284
  • All your llamas are belong to us....
Re: Reducing audience chatter in post
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2017, 12:09:55 PM »
Manual spectral repair work. I've found Izotope RX to be the best at it. But you'll have to manually identify the offending frequencies, there's no plug-in for "less crowd"

We've got a "Watson" computer, but no plug-in for "less-crowd".

I thought this generation of programmers was supposed to be near-genius......ho hum for now I guess.. :bigsmile:
Proud member of the reality-based community

BSCS-L->JB-mod NAK CM-300 (CP-1,-3)->LSD2->CA CAFS-Omni->Sony ECM-907**Apogee MiniMe Rev. C->CA Ugly II->Oade line-mod SBM1**Edirol OCM R-44->Tascam DR-22WL->Sony TCD-D8


"Don't ever take an all or nothing attitude when it comes to making a difference
and being beautiful and making the world a beautiful place through your actions.
Every little bit is registered.  Every little bit.  So be as beautiful as you can as often as you can"

"It'll never be over, 'till we learn."
 
"My dream is to get a bus and get the band and just go coast to coast. Just about everything else except music, is anti-musical.  That's it.  Music's the thing." - Jeb Puryear

Offline waltmon

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1714
  • Gender: Male
Re: Reducing audience chatter in post
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2017, 04:24:02 PM »
It just seems it would make sense that if you could remove the vocals from a wav the offending frequencies could be removed or at least de-emphasized a bit.
U89s, KM140's, 483's, V2, 744T(SSD)

CA-14 > UBB > Tascam DR-2D

ISO: KM-150's or AK50 capsules & 1 pound non-sequencial $50.00 bills

Offline hoserama

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
Re: Reducing audience chatter in post
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2017, 12:31:59 AM »
How do you train a computer to just take out vocals and not music? Or certain crowd noise?

Karaoke mixes and such are created by the spatial/phase relationship, and how vocals are generally panned to the center. Audience recordings from concerts won't have such a clean and perfect spatial mix.
Audio: AT943 + SBD feeds
Antennas: Lots of those
Cables: Lots of those
Recorders: Cymatic Utrack24, Cymatic LR16, RME Multiface, (2) Tascam 680, (2) Tascam 2D, Zoom H6, Zoom H4n, and a graveyard of irivers/nomads/minidiscs.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.102 seconds with 27 queries.
© 2002-2017 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF
Website Design by Foxtrot Media, Inc., a Baltimore Website Company