Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: battery box crosstalk  (Read 4423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
battery box crosstalk
« on: October 11, 2005, 07:25:28 AM »
Hello,

I hope it's OK to ask here about how to lessen crosstalk in my batterbox.
It's the simple setup: 2 x capacitor and 2 x resistor to power the (2 wire) mics and over the battery a 10 uF electrolytic in parallel with a 100 nF film to help the battery and to avoid crosstalk since both mics are connected there.
But signal still goes from mic a over the powering resistor, via the other powering resistor to mic b. From my measurements crosstalk is wayy too high (should be down 80+ dB?).

Anybody got an idea about how to fix this? More capacitance over the battery? (better quality?)

Please post!
« Last Edit: October 11, 2005, 07:27:24 AM by udovdh »

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2005, 11:31:53 AM »
I believe that you want to increase the resistor values.  Not sure what you're using but how about trying 10k?
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2005, 12:01:07 PM »
I believe that you want to increase the resistor values.  Not sure what you're using but how about trying 10k?
Hehe...
I was at 22K, but lower is the spec of the manufacturer...
Any tricks I could use? (diodes?)

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2005, 01:30:08 PM »
which mics?  are they getting enough juice with 22k? maybe that's killing the output level and consequently raising the crosstalk relative to the signal?
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2005, 02:27:21 PM »
which mics?  are they getting enough juice with 22k? maybe that's killing the output level and consequently raising the crosstalk relative to the signal?
Everything was fine at 22K. No distortion.
Stuff is even better (highs and such) at lower resistance, exactly like the manufacturer specifies.

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2005, 05:21:19 PM »
Everything was fine at 22K. No distortion.
Stuff is even better (highs and such) at lower resistance, exactly like the manufacturer specifies.
you are using higher resistance  ???
I would think 22k would yield low signal levels.  I believe setting bias voltage correctly is a balancing act between dynamic range and output level.  Regardless, I don't know which capsules you're using but you seem quite sure that what you're doing is good so we'll just leave it at that. 
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2005, 05:21:24 PM »
So, in short, when implementing the manufacturer powering requirements I get better mic performance but higher crosstalk.
How do I get rid of it?
How bad is the idea of diodes in the lines towards the mic capsules? (bfeore of after the resistor)
Other solutions?

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2005, 05:23:33 PM »
Everything was fine at 22K. No distortion.
Stuff is even better (highs and such) at lower resistance, exactly like the manufacturer specifies.
you are using higher resistance  ???
Lower than 22K.

Quote
I would think 22k would yield low signal levels.  I believe setting bias voltage correctly is a balancing act between dynamic range and output level.  Regardless, I don't know which capsules you're using but you seem quite sure that what you're doing is good so we'll just leave it at that. 
Here lower resistor values decrease amplification.

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2005, 05:25:23 PM »
you might want to pm poorlyconditioned on this board.  He's been playing around more than I have.
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline poorlyconditioned

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1958
  • I'm a tapir!
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2005, 05:53:08 PM »
Everything was fine at 22K. No distortion.
Stuff is even better (highs and such) at lower resistance, exactly like the manufacturer specifies.
you are using higher resistance  ???
Lower than 22K.

Quote
I would think 22k would yield low signal levels.  I believe setting bias voltage correctly is a balancing act between dynamic range and output level.  Regardless, I don't know which capsules you're using but you seem quite sure that what you're doing is good so we'll just leave it at that. 
Here lower resistor values decrease amplification.

Hey, I heard my name.

Anyway, you gotta say what capsules you're using.  Is it a standard batt. box (or my 3-wire version)?

I'm almost sure you've gotta go down to 10K.  Do that first, then let's talk...

  Richard
Mics: Sennheiser MKE2002 (dummy head), Studio Projects C4, AT825 (unmodded), AT822 franken mic (x2), AT853(hc,c,sc,o), Senn. MKE2, Senn MKE40, Shure MX183/5, CA Cards, homebrew Panasonic and Transsound capsules.
Pre/ADC: Presonus Firepod & Firebox, DMIC20(x2), UA5(poorly-modded, AD8620+AD8512opamps), VX440
Recorders: Edirol R4, R09, IBM X24 laptop, NJB3(x2), HiMD(x2), MD(1).
** This individual has moved to user "illconditioned" **

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2005, 01:34:46 AM »

Anyway, you gotta say what capsules you're using.  Is it a standard batt. box (or my 3-wire version)?

I'm almost sure you've gotta go down to 10K.  Do that first, then let's talk...
It's 2-wire Sennheiser capsules. Amplification decreases with lower resistance values. Sound improves slightly when going down to the manufacturer recommended value.

Offline Bertho

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2005, 07:21:39 AM »
Use the resistor values that you like and increase the bypass capacitor. 
I would not mess with diodes.  As an alternative, split the feed to each side by for example a 100 ohm resistor going to the battery (100 ohm in series with each 10k) and then bypass each 100 ohm resistor separately.  Your bypass will be more effective by it self and you will have dual filters going from one side to the other.  Watch out for ground loops so use single point grounding.
Bertho

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2005, 07:53:01 AM »
Use the resistor values that you like and increase the bypass capacitor. 
I would not mess with diodes.  As an alternative, split the feed to each side by for example a 100 ohm resistor going to the battery (100 ohm in series with each 10k) and then bypass each 100 ohm resistor separately.  Your bypass will be more effective by it self and you will have dual filters going from one side to the other.  Watch out for ground loops so use single point grounding.
I..e: 100 Ohm in series with the resistance taht is there, parallelled by a few uF?

Offline Karl

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 377
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2005, 01:09:24 PM »
A few thoughts and a few questions...

Are you saying that your crosstalk is -80dB?  Or you want it to be -80dB?

A diode would be bad--an audio signals waveforms have positive values as well as negative--a diode would get rid of the negative side of all waveforms.

I think that to get rid of the crosstalk completely you would prob have to electrically shield one channel from the other.  I don't know if that's possible when using a single 9V batt for two channels.  Anyways, to shield you have to enclose all components of one channel inside of a conductor that is grounded.

Are you sure your crosstalk is happening ONLY inside your batt box and not other places also along the signal path?

In a live recording situation, -80db of crosstalk will not hurt you.  You will have a hard time noticing that it's affecting your recording at all.
My portable rig:

AT853>Zoom F6

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: battery box crosstalk
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2005, 12:46:22 PM »
A few thoughts and a few questions...

Are you saying that your crosstalk is -80dB?  Or you want it to be -80dB?
I want it at -80.

Quote
A diode would be bad--an audio signals waveforms have positive values as well as negative--a diode would get rid of the negative side of all waveforms.
Two diodes. One to each mic resistor.
Crosstalk signal would see both.

Quote
Are you sure your crosstalk is happening ONLY inside your batt box and not other places also along the signal path?
Quite sure it is the box.
I have quality cables, good recording equipment, good plugs and soldering.
I also see the problem when one mic is disconnected from the battery box.


 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF