Author Topic: ADK TL's and Warm Mod UA-5 (Read 6319 times)

Chuck · « **Reply #15 on:** January 05, 2004, 09:10:21 PM »

Quote from: Tim on January 05, 2004, 04:46:09 PM

Quote from: Xpanding on January 05, 2004, 04:21:15 PM
ok, thanks for clearing that up...the Pmod was pure speculation on my part, thankfully Craig can attest to both.

calico, i'd only consider the AD1000 if you're not wanting the spend the $$$ on a mini me. you DEFINITELY will like either combo, but man it sucks knowing that eventually, i will turn on that ad1000 and wind up asking someone for a patch !

he already has an ad1000
it's still the best sounding 16bit converter for my ears, better than both the minime and the v3 at 16bit. Overall I like the mod-sbm-1 at 16 bit

Yeah, I do have the AD-1000. Of course it's at ProDigital being repaired now.

I've been checking into the ADK's. It looks like it's going to be a little while before they come out with a decent SD mic. I'm also afraid the price might be steep when they do put one out. I'm starting to think the TL's are a great microphone for the price.

nic · « **Reply #16 on:** January 05, 2004, 09:16:48 PM »

"I'm starting to think the TL's are a great microphone for the price."

no thinking about it, they are a great mic for the price!

wsp12 · « **Reply #17 on:** January 06, 2004, 07:50:18 PM »

i had 391's and didn't want to have to get extra caps and so i sold them, and got some tl's, but i have yet to run them

another thing about the tl's is that they are not as big as your normal ld's can't wait though maybe at Clutch in a month ;DMike

BCostigan · « **Reply #18 on:** January 07, 2004, 06:02:44 PM »

Greg thinking about the TLs?!?! Now if only I could sell my ADK LEs so I could get a pair of TLs myself........

caymanreview · « **Reply #19 on:** January 07, 2004, 06:51:17 PM »

what do you guys think about the TL > MME combo. has anyone heard anything with this combo yet? anyone running it?

Brian · « **Reply #20 on:** January 07, 2004, 08:04:51 PM »

trade you my TL's for your 480s for a show sometime and we'll find out

Brian

Kindguy · « **Reply #21 on:** January 08, 2004, 12:35:29 AM »

I run the TL's & the 480's & like them both.

Next show I'm running a 3 mic mix TL's omni & 1 481 >warm UA-5.

caymanreview · « **Reply #22 on:** January 08, 2004, 02:56:24 AM »

Quote from: S_TL-Taper on January 07, 2004, 08:04:51 PM

trade you my TL's for your 480s for a show sometime and we'll find out

Brian

we are gonna have to do that. if i dont buy some TL's before im in STL again

Brian · « **Reply #23 on:** January 08, 2004, 01:48:23 PM »

galactic at MSNights in feburary? I'd like to do the comparison at MSnights since it's probably the best sounding medium size venue in St. Louis. of course a concert at a theatre iin some college town in IL wouldn't be out of the wuestion either. i'll check jambase and see if there is anything in the future fo us to do the comp.

Brian

1st set only · « **Reply #24 on:** January 08, 2004, 04:06:10 PM »

Quote from: Craig T on January 05, 2004, 09:50:57 AM

Quote from: Chris K on January 05, 2004, 09:33:57 AM
craig t on ts.com runs this setup also, i believe

Yes he does.

Here's a few uploads...
http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=5298
http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=4601
http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=4583

Bass is fat and punchy - I rarely find a need to tweak with EQ in post, but there have been a few shows that came out too bass heavy.

Great combo - highly recommended.

M/S sounds NEAT! I just got a sample from the above shows. in recording M/S with idea of doing the encoding in post which mic is pointed to the side? L or R

Craig T · « **Reply #25 on:** January 08, 2004, 04:53:05 PM »

The raw recording was:
L=mid (cardiod facing front)
R=side (fig-8 facing left)

Stereo decoding:
L=mid+side
R=mid-side

If you software editor has m/s>stereo decoding, it may tell you which channels your mid and side should be for the raw file. If you recorded it "backwards", just swap channels on your raw file before decoding.