Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: confused about portables  (Read 6738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
confused about portables
« on: March 24, 2011, 09:51:48 PM »
Greetings all. Please let me preface my quandary:

After 25 years of taping / trading live shows, I am feeling really confused with today's 'new' technology choices. After starting with cassettes, moving to DAT, and then CDR, I am once again faced with a format change. I was happy with CD, but I'm realizing that this format is another of the 'dying' breed of technology.

I have 1,500 live shows. Back in the DAT days I was recording live shows and trading, but I was never very keen on using the DAT recorders for casual playing of music, as they were very fragile and seemed to need constant service. CDR has its pros and cons, especially thinking in terms of long term disc storage.

I have been seriously considering transferring my collection to FLAC files, as this seems to be what most people are doing. I like to listen to my music at work, where I have been using a portable CD player and Grado iGi earbud headphones. The sound output of the portable CD player sucks, though it improved a lot with the Grado phones. It's too bad that high quality portable CD players haven't been made in some time. The portable CD players seem to be geared for children, and they are definitely not audiophile quality.

My question:

I need to find a high quality portable that will work with my iMac and play gapless FLACs. I have never owned an iPod because I can't stand MP-3 compression and I Really can't stand gaps between tracks. I've looked at the RockBox website and that seems to be one option, though it is not available for current iPod models (Classic). I looked online at the Cowan players, but they don't seem to work with Macs. I want something well made, but I don't want/need a lot of bells and whistles.

The few times that I've looked at an iPod, it seems that they are geared to play 'songs' rather than live shows. I can't stand iTunes on my Mac, as it wants to put all the versions of the same song together alphabetically. Is there a way, using the RockBox firmware, to select complete shows to play?

I don't really record live all that much anymore, though I would still like the option to do so, seeing how I still have my Neumann mics and Beyerdynamics preamp. DAT blanks are impossible to find now, even though my D8 and DA-P1 are still solid.

I have considered getting a portable HD recorder, like a Sony or Tascam, and just loading it up with Uncompressed shows to listen to at work. I know that it probably wouldn't hold  nearly as many shows (uncompressed) as a FLAC player would, but it would work I guess. I don't need to the ability to take Everything with me at all times.

All of the CDs that I have recorded (DAT->CDR transfer) with my HHb CDR 800 have no text files encoded on them. I would need to add that somehow, before loading the shows onto a portable, so that I would know what I was listening to. How do I go about doing that?

I know these are a lot of questions and I thank everyone in advance for your time.

Offline noahbickart

  • phishrabbi
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 2554
  • Gender: Male
  • So now I wander over grounds of light...
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2011, 10:39:51 PM »
why not buy an ipod classic, and simply use the apple lossless format?
Recording:
Capsules: Schoeps mk41v (x2), mk22 (x2), mk3 (x2), mk21 & mk8
Cables: 2x nbob KCY, 1 pair nbob actives, GAKables 10' & 20' 6-channel snakes, Darktrain 2 & 4 channel KCY and mini xlr extensions:
Preamps:    Schoeps VMS 02iub, Naiant IPA, Sound Devices Mixpre6 I
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre6 I, Sony PCM m10

Home Playback: Mac Mini> Mytek Brooklyn+> McIntosh MC162> Eminent Tech LFT-16; Musical Fidelity xCan v2> Hifiman HE-4XX / Beyerdynamic DT880

Office Playback: iMac> Grace m903> AKG k701 / Hifiman HE-400

Offline johnw

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
  • Gender: Male
    • My cd List
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2011, 10:56:16 PM »
or an ipod touch and the flac player ap
Schoeps MK41 & MK4V  |  Schoeps CMC6, Schoeps KCY, AKI/2C, PFA, Nbox Cable/PFA  |  Grace V2, Nbox Platinum  |  SD744T, SD MixPre 6, Sony PCM M10

Canon 16-35mm/2.8L mkii, 24-70mm/2.8L, 70-200mm/2.8L IS, 50mm/1.8 mkii, 135mm/2L, 100mm/2.8L IS, Sigma 35mm/1.4 A  |  Canon 5D mk4

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2011, 11:38:08 PM »
What would be the best way to go? What's the Apple lossless? If I started trading FLAC files would I have to do any extra conversion or would it recognize them?

Thanks

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2011, 12:14:58 AM »
I tried to be as explicit as i could in my original post. Yes, I have an iMac and I have always had Macs and like them better than PCs.

Online goodcooker

  • Trade Count: (43)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4668
  • Gender: Male
  • goes to 11
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2011, 01:31:46 AM »

There are some links and recommendations in this thread

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=141158.0

Personally I used a Rockboxed iRiver for portable playback for a long time. Plays flacs, wav and mp3s, so I was covered.

Now I just use my Droid phone and the andless app but I don't listen to music at work or on the go often.
Line Audio CM3/OM1 || MBHO KA500 hyper>PFA|| ADK A51 type IV || AKG C522XY
Oade Warm Mod and Presence+ Mod UA5s || Aerco MP2(needs help) || Neve Portico 5012 || Apogee MMP
SD Mixpre6 || Oade Concert Mod DR100mkii

pocket sized - CA11 cards > SP SB10 > Sony PCM A10

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/goodcooker

"Are you the Zman?" - fan at Panic 10-08-10 Kansas City
"I don't know who left this perfectly good inflatable wook doll here, but if I'm blowing her up, I'm keeping her." -  hoppedup

Offline Simp-Dawg

  • Bad Little Dawggie
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15077
  • Gender: Male
  • Daddy needs a drink!
    • Colorado Tapers
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2011, 02:24:35 PM »
to rip your CD's, create FLACs, and tag the files on your Mac, all you need is xACT, created by a member here:
http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/14246/xact

there's lots of options for portable players, and i don't see why something wouldn't work with a Mac just to transfer the files...or if you're in front of your mac all day you can just download Cog to playback flac on your mac.
CO Crüe Benchwarmer

Playback: Denon DVD-2910 > Denon AVR-3806 > Segue Doghouse Speaker Cable > B&W DM-610i / Klipsch RW-10 Subwoofer

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2011, 03:16:45 PM »
Thank you for the advice. I would like a portable player for work. I only have the computer (Mac) at home.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2011, 04:56:08 PM »
you can play gapless live shows via itunes and an ipod. just select the songs you want, go into "info" and select "gapless playback" under one of the menu options

you can sort your music in itunes by any of the categories you see on the top bar. sort by album and you won't have every version of the same song right next you each other

sorry no itunes in front of me at the moment but these are very easy issues to fix
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2011, 07:45:00 PM »
you can play gapless live shows via itunes and an ipod. just select the songs you want, go into "info" and select "gapless playback" under one of the menu options

you can sort your music in itunes by any of the categories you see on the top bar. sort by album and you won't have every version of the same song right next you each other

I didn't think iPods would play FLAC.  ???

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 6477
  • Gender: Male
  • Feel brand new about it
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2011, 08:20:12 PM »
Not the new ones.  There is an app for the iPod Touch that allows FLAC playback.  I have an iPod 5.5G with Rockbox installed (very easy), which allows for FLAC playback when needed.  The great part is, the original OS is still on the device and can be booted into either OS as you wish. 
mg m20.21.23 ■ akg ck61.62.63 »  nbob■naiant
aercomp2 ■ v2∞3 ■ sx-m2d2
d100 ■ pmd661 ■ r44ocm ■ f3

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2011, 09:15:39 PM »
Is it 'gapless 'FLAC? There are so many things I need to figure out with all this. It's a far cry from when I used to take my D6 everywhere.

I've read about the Rockbox OS. That seems cool. Why isn't it available for the iPod models currently in production? How much does the Rockbox mod cost? I wouldn't care that both OS  are available, as I would never have a need for MP-3 playback.

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 6477
  • Gender: Male
  • Feel brand new about it
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2011, 10:09:32 PM »
Rockbox is freeware:  http://www.rockbox.org/

As for the newer iPod models, I don't think anyone has been able to crack the OS??
mg m20.21.23 ■ akg ck61.62.63 »  nbob■naiant
aercomp2 ■ v2∞3 ■ sx-m2d2
d100 ■ pmd661 ■ r44ocm ■ f3

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2011, 12:52:06 AM »
Rockbox is freeware:  http://www.rockbox.org/

As for the newer iPod models, I don't think anyone has been able to crack the OS??


Free huh? I like that. Too bad that they can't redo the OS on the newer ones.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2011, 01:45:10 PM »
Yes, both the FLAC app and the rockbox'd ipod play gapless FLAC.
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #15 on: March 26, 2011, 05:22:42 PM »
What about the Apple Lossless? Is that gapless too? I like the looks of the Classic rather than the Touch.  I like the simplicity. I don't need / want games or video. I just want to be able to listen to my music in the highest quality without gaps between tracks.

Can I convert the discs on my iMac and drag / drop them onto the iPod without needing iTunes?

How many discs can you put on a 120 gig iPod Classic in the lossless format before it is full?

Thanks.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2011, 12:23:34 PM »
I believe the iPod/iTunes also have a "gapless playback" setting that can be enabled within iTunes by selecting the tracks in question, right clicking, going to "get info" and clicking something like "gapless" on one of the tabs...
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #17 on: May 01, 2011, 11:04:11 AM »
What about the Apple Lossless? Is that gapless too? I like the looks of the Classic rather than the Touch.  I like the simplicity. I don't need / want games or video. I just want to be able to listen to my music in the highest quality without gaps between tracks.

Can I convert the discs on my iMac and drag / drop them onto the iPod without needing iTunes?

How many discs can you put on a 120 gig iPod Classic in the lossless format before it is full?

Thanks.

A FLAC compresses 16bit files to between 50 and 60% of the original file size.  One hour of uncompressed music in 16bit is about 600MB.  So, if you figure about 300mb per hour, that's roughly 400 hours of FLACs on a 120gig classic.

I think the classic is the way to go.  I own two of them.  Their advantage is the disc size and long battery life between charges (20+ hours of playtime).  Their disadvantage is that they have a disc inside of them and they're said to be prone to failure where the chip based storage units with no moving parts are said to be more reliable.  That said, I've owned three classics now over the course of 4 or 5 years, I used mine daily for a minimum of an hour and I've never had a disc failure.

If I can read between the lines on your Original Post (OP), it sounds to me like you haven't been involved with this subject in maybe 5 years or more.  The reason I say this is that gapless playback really hasn't been an issue for a good number of years now and FLAC has been a standard now for at least that long. 

The only reason I'm pointing this out is to say that you might be basing your current goals on the state-of-the-art from 5 years ago.  File compression technology has really improved over that time.  If you haven't listened, you should at least give a listen to the higher quality AAC compression algorithms before concluding the file compression isn't for you.  (AAC is the Apple version of MP3.)  At a minimum, don't judge compression by the MP3's you listened to 4 or 5 years ago, because the technology has improved sound quality alot. 

The reason I point this out is that, since you say that your purpose for this is for listening at work in non-audiophile environment, the AAC format might work for you and give you 10 times more capacity on your ipod classic.  I have nearly my entire music library on my bigger classic and I literally can't live without it. 

Anyway getting back to your questions, I've never had an issue with gapless playback on my ipods, so that shouldn't be a concern whatsoever. 

You mention issues with how itunes sorts your music.  That's also a non-issue because, in itunes, you can segregate and sort your music whatever way you define.  There are something like 40 or 50 different fields that you can define for each file, if you want to.  I personally keep my music segregated by artist and album and that's how I have itunes sorts.  If I wanted to, I could set up my sorts by song title, genre, song length, number of times I've played it, year the song was released, or just about anything you can imagine because 40 or 50 fields is ALOT of data for each song.   

So, the above is my itunes, but I also have my ipod menu setup the same way as my itunes menu...by artist and album.  When I'. m in the root menu of my ipod, I select 'music'.  The next menu allows me to pick what I listen to either by artist, album, song title, or cover flow (that's a semi cool app that lets you toggle through the cover art of each album to select the album that way.) 

For the shows I've recorded, I enter the date and location as the album title.  For each track, I define the tracking information, such as the song title and the track number.  If you want, for a longer show that would span multiple CDs if you were to burn them onto CDR, you can also define the disc number (1 of 3, 2 of 3, etc).  This keeps each of the songs in the right order in itunes.

If I want to listen to a show I've recorded, I select that artist and album and it plays back seamlessly.

When I load my recorded music into my itunes library, I load it in as a 16bit uncompressed .wav file.   If I wanted to, I could load these onto my ipod and listen to them directly (uncompressed).  I could also load and listen to my 24bit files if I preferred.

However, I find the AAC format to sound great for my listening environment.  All of my listening is either at work, or in the car on the way to work.  Therefore, I convert all of my .wav files to AAC format.  To do this, I go into itunes and select the .wav files that I've loaded into my itunes library.  Once those files are highlighted, you go into the tools menu of itunes and select 'convert to AAC'.  Itunes does the conversion and then you delete the wav files from the itunes library.  Synch the AAC files into your ipod and you're done!

All of my shows sound great to me and the playback is completely gapless.

I keep all of my master recordings archived on harddrives.  I have 5 or 6 1TB drives that are redundant.  I expect my harddrives to fail, but I keep them redundant so that when one does fail, I have a backup.  When failure happens, I don't lose any data but I go right out and buy a replacement to make sure I stay redundant.  My redundant drives are in my office desk drawer...one set is at home and the other is at work.  If the house get hit by a tornado, my data is safe.

I gave up on CDR and DVD storage 2 years ago or so because I was having a high incidence of disc failures less than 2 years after archiving (something like between 1 and 2 failed reads for every 30 discs or so.)  Since 1TB drives cost something $80 or $90 the cost against optical discs is cheaper too.  I don't really worry about buying the best harddrives, because I just assume failure will happen.  That keeps me diligent about keeping backups current.  If I paid $300 for the best drive on the market, I'd get complacent, and from what I'm told those drives aren't necessarily any less prone to failure anyway...maybe they last longer but they will fail someday.

I hope this helps give you a little more detailed info.

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2011, 10:32:38 AM »
Anyone rockbox an iPad yet? I have an iPad 2 that I recently won. Might give it a try.
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #19 on: May 07, 2011, 12:06:43 AM »
Well, after LOTS of consideration, I just bought a 160 gig, black, iPod Classic and I'm in the process of loading it up from iTunes. I am using the Apple Lossless files (ALC) and I imagine that I can get at least 300 shows on it this way. It seems like a pretty cool device. I had to laugh when I realized that this is the first piece of nice
'playback-only' related gear that I have bought in years! (Usually the $$$, what little was available, was spent on recording gear.)

Because of high concert ticket AND fuel prices I have decided to concentrate on fully enjoying the shows I already have., so this seems like a pretty cool way to do that.

I remember sitting in the back of my '67 VW camper at Dead shows in the late 80's with other tapers and trying to imagine gear in the future. Even the CONCEPT of a device like this would have blown my mind then, and certainly does now! Very cool!

Thanks to all who have given your advice. I really appreciate it! 

Jeff

Online Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15732
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2011, 02:47:10 PM »
Anyone try the Hifiman portable players? http://www.hifiman.us/
Supposedly targeted at those looking for a device dedicated specifically to high quality sound replay. 

A new, smaller & less costly, ipod sized version was announced last fall that I didn't see on the site liked above- http://news.cnet.com/8301-13645_3-20021179-47.html
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline twatts (pants are so over-rated...)

  • <://PHiSH//><
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • Gender: Male
  • Lego made a Mini-Fig of me!
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2011, 02:58:38 PM »
***Do you have PHISH, VIDA BLUE, JAZZ MANDOLIN PROJECT or any other Phish related DATs/Tapes/MDs that need to be transferred???  I can do them for you!!!***

I will return your DATs/Tapes/MDs.  I'll also provide Master FLAC files via DropBox.  PM me for details.

Sony PCM R500 > SPDIF > Tascam HD-P2
Nakamichi DR-3 > (Oade Advanced Concert Mod) Tascam HD-P2
Sony MDS-JE510 > Hosa ODL-276 > Tascam HD-P2

******

Online Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15732
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2011, 03:21:47 PM »
That's the one.  Curious how it works for our type of material and if it sounds significantly superior to other portable players in the opinion of the members here (which I value far more than reviews on headphone sites).
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline OldNeumanntapr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #23 on: May 18, 2011, 09:28:24 PM »
Thanks Tone Deaf for the extremely thorough reply. That answered a lot of questions.

I love the new iPod Classic. I'm just putting my favorite, best-sounding, shows on it. I know it will change my life more than my D6 did 25 years ago! Eventually, I would like to run it through a small set of powered monitors, such as the Audix PH3-S :

http://www.audixusa.com/docs/specs_pdf/PH3-S.pdf

These are small and run off of 12 volt (with a small power loss), or full power through an inverter, or so I was told when I emailed the company. I want to put them on the top corners of my delivery van's dash. I was thinking of putting a piece of velcro low on the inside of the A-Pillers, close to the top of the dash, on each side, to hold them steady when on the road.

I would use a line out cable (through the docking port) to hook them up. Hopefully it would sound good.


Offline scb

  • Eli Manning should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell. Would you like a cookie, son?
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8677
  • Gender: Male
Re: confused about portables
« Reply #24 on: May 19, 2011, 09:50:22 AM »
(AAC is the Apple version of MP3.)

Not the "Apple version," but an alternative to MP3 that was actually designed to be the successor to MP3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 53 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF