Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: u87 v u89  (Read 12077 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
u87 v u89
« on: January 10, 2006, 04:16:03 PM »
What's the diff?
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2006, 04:36:56 PM »
What's the diff?

2.

sorry you asked :)

The u87 has 3 directional patterns, the u89 has 5
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2006, 04:44:59 PM »
They both suck equally.    :o
 :laugh:
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2006, 04:50:08 PM »
thats not the only difference. the u87 uses the K67capsule.. The TLM 170, TLM 193 and U 89 all use the same capsule, the K 89.

the U87 is rumoured to be "brighter", supposed to have more detail and was designed to be more up front sounding(in its cardioid setting), where the U89  is almost neutral, very flat...

u87s are a legend in their own right..by the 1970s it was "the" mic for professional studio recording. A lot of people still use it as a go to mic for vocals. Stephen Paul Audio worked out a mod for the u87(focusing on diaphragm switching) that is pretty popular in high end studios. Klaus Heyne also has a mod for it(u87) that focuses more on the electronics of the mic...


I have u87s and like them a lot more than the u89s I had. YMMV :)

« Last Edit: January 10, 2006, 05:01:30 PM by Teddy »

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2006, 04:53:54 PM »
Just to add to this (on a serious note), the K103 capsule sounds NOTHING like the K87 capsule in any way, shape or form.  Naturally, the K87 and K89 capsules are different as well.  It's personal preference as to which one is better, of course. 

The 89 is thought of as being more "flat" in terms of frequency response than the 87.

There are some minor differences in the electronic circuit as well, and of course the overall size of the 89 is smaller than the 87.

Dirk
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2006, 05:01:18 PM »
Yes, thanks, should've excluded the polar pattern diffs (smart ass jonny :P).  I was thinking that the u87s had a different sound than the 89s.

Are there any phantom-powerable LD neumanns, other than the u87, u89, 170s, 103s and the usm stereo mic? Ts
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2006, 05:03:13 PM »
Yes, thanks, should've excluded the polar pattern diffs.  I was thinking that the u87s had a different sound than the 89s.

Are there any phantom-powerable LD neumanns, other than the u87, u89, 170s, 103s and the usm stereo mic?

tlm193(similar to u89) and tlm127.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2006, 05:05:40 PM by Teddy »

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2006, 05:04:13 PM »
TLM 127 and TLM 193 also

If you want to really go retro, there's the U47, U47FET and U67, M49, M249, etc.

Lots of stuff out there.  try http://www.neumann.com

EDIT:  sorry, didn't see the phantom power statement

Teddy, great minds think alike eh?
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2006, 05:06:49 PM »

Teddy, great minds think alike eh?

Were both mic nerds.  ,And look up to Klaus Heyne, and its a German thing I guess..  ;D

Einheit für deutsche Leute! :P
« Last Edit: January 10, 2006, 05:09:50 PM by Teddy »

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2006, 05:16:14 PM »
TLM 127 and TLM 193 also

If you want to really go retro, there's the U47, U47FET and U67, M49, M249, etc.

Lots of stuff out there.  try http://www.neumann.com

EDIT:  sorry, didn't see the phantom power statement

Teddy, great minds think alike eh?

Damn, I was hoping that m49 was phantom...looks pretty nice and there's one on fleabay right now.
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2006, 05:18:50 PM »
they can be modded for phantom. Decca did it in the 70s for their recordings(before they changed to m50s, then schoeps)

Teddy

TLM 127 and TLM 193 also

If you want to really go retro, there's the U47, U47FET and U67, M49, M249, etc.

Lots of stuff out there.  try http://www.neumann.com

EDIT:  sorry, didn't see the phantom power statement

Teddy, great minds think alike eh?

Damn, I was hoping that m49 was phantom...looks pretty nice and there's one on fleabay right now.

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2006, 05:24:48 PM »
You realize any M49 in reasonably good condition will probably sell for between $6-8K right?

Just wanted to make sure you were aware.

Dirk
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2006, 05:29:02 PM »
What about the M149's?  Has anyone used or heard these puppies? 
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2006, 05:29:43 PM »
You realize any M49 in reasonably good condition will probably sell for between $6-8K right?

Just wanted to make sure you were aware.

Dirk

Looks about right, given the fact that the fleabay m49 and 249 are in the $5k range and I noticed had been "refurbished" by B.L.U.E. Any thoughts on BLUE?
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: u87 v u89
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2006, 05:34:16 PM »
Blue has been doing refurbs on old Neumann and Telefunken gear for quite a while now.  They do a very nice job.  They do NOT however restore it to original factory condition.  They build their own power supplies, and if parts are needed they are made by BLUE, not NOS (new old stock).  So you could buy a BLUE U47, but it might very well have the BLUE "47 clone capsule" rather than the original.  That being said however, their work is considered to be very good overall.  Just not completely faithful to the original.

Dirk
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.095 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF