Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Testing my MK012  (Read 5967 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blu666z

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3277
  • AT ES943(H/C/O caps) » JKLab PP9 Pre » wmod UA-5
Testing my MK012
« on: November 07, 2003, 07:57:35 PM »
Got the GC pair.  Unmatched.  I'd like to see just how far off they are.  How would I got about that?  I was thinking just playing the same sample through my stereo.  Once for each mic, not touching levels and running both through the same channel.  Put them in Cool Edit pro and compare them.  Seen some people mention pink noise.  What exactly is that?

-Kevin

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2003, 08:04:30 PM »
In Cool Edit go to:
Generate> Noise> 44.1/16bit> Pink noise
Make a CD and use it to make the recording.

Pink Noise= noise at all frequency's equally
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline blu666z

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3277
  • AT ES943(H/C/O caps) » JKLab PP9 Pre » wmod UA-5
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2003, 08:56:07 PM »
What should I be comparing in the test?  Mainly levels or frequency somehow?

-Kevin

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline blu666z

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3277
  • AT ES943(H/C/O caps) » JKLab PP9 Pre » wmod UA-5
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2003, 09:09:04 PM »
Sweet.  Overlooked that one somehow.

-Kevin

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2003, 02:09:21 AM »
Since we're on the subject, what is the logic behind pink (or white for that matter) noise?
Is it for getting a general fix on sensitivity.  Or is it for frequency response?  I was thinking a sweep that covers the spectrum.   Amplitude would be easy to see over the range.

So proper matching involves both output level and frequency characteristics.  Is there anything else?
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline joeshambro

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 967
  • Gender: Male
  • taper turned professional FOH mixer
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2003, 03:02:26 AM »
White noise is considered random noise;  it contains all of the elements that other "color" noises have.  It has equal energy at all frequencies.  Dithering makes use of white noise;  it's used in lots of musical effects, etc.

Pink noise is logarithmic (and thus more pleasing to the sense of hearing), vs. the completely random nature of white noise.  Pink noise, in theory, is just white noise through filters.  Pink noise's spectrum level is measured down 3db every octave whereas white noise increases 3db.  Pink noise, when measured with a real-time EQ at 1/3-octave, will produce a flat response.

In testing mics and any audio equipment, pink noise is more approximate of the frequency characteristics that are pleasing to the human sense of hearing, thus better for EQ'ing systems.




Offline chuckcage

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 243
  • Gender: Male
  • Learning fast...
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2003, 11:34:50 AM »
Kevin, I'd be interested in hearing about your results with your GC pair!

Chuck
---
Currently:
C1000s/MK012 > PB224 > AD-20 > NJB3

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:Testing my MK012
« Reply #8 on: November 24, 2003, 01:35:16 AM »
i suggest the yamaha sound reinforcement book for more on white and pink noise

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.059 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF