Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)  (Read 4926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« on: July 14, 2017, 11:40:04 PM »
In the attached image, is the part circled in red DC offset?
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline bombdiggity

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2017, 02:33:48 AM »
DC offset deals with the entire segment not a tiny segment of it. 

"DC offset is a mean amplitude displacement from zero. In Audacity it can be seen as an offset of the recorded waveform away from the center zero point. DC offset is a potential source of clicks, distortion and loss of audio volume."
 
DC offset - Audacity Development Manual
manual.audacityteam.org/man/dc_offset.html

There's a dramatic illustration of what it could look like there ^. 
Gear:
Audio:
Schoeps MK4V
Nak CM-100/CM-300 w/ CP-1's or CP-4's
SP-CMC-25
>
Oade C mod R-44  OR
Tinybox > Sony PCM-M10 (formerly Roland R-05) 
Video: Varied, with various outboard mics depending on the situation

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2017, 10:22:43 AM »
That image shows a plot of voltage over time, with the change in voltage representing pressure variations. See how the area you've circled undulates above and below the zero voltage line?  The center of undulation indicates the average voltage value.  If that center value was constantly above or below the zero voltage line over the entire length of the file, it would indicate the presence of DC offset.  A recording system intentionally sensitive to zero-hertz pressure variations acts as a barometer.  Since audio recording systems are designed to measure pressure variations only in the audible range, with a sensitivity that intentionally drops off to nothing before reaching zero hertz, significant DC offset in an audio recording system indicates something may be incorrect in the signal chain.  Or that Jimmy Cliff is in town.

« Last Edit: July 17, 2017, 02:01:15 PM by Gutbucket »
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline bombdiggity

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2017, 12:27:53 PM »
Great breakdown (as usual) ^. 

I've noticed that certain pre's have a defined DC offset.  For example my Tinybox runs at .03% every time and always has.  My Oade modded R-44 always exactly at 0%, running the same mics (the only other difference in the chain being the cables).  I can't say I hear anything amiss with the sound of the Tinybox though I always correct it in editing. 

Old analog sources (like cassettes) transferred to digital tend to show much larger DC offsets.  Sometimes different offsets in each channel.  Cassette recordings almost always have an offset. 

Some instruments will appear to have much greater energy above the zero voltage line than below (mostly brass ones) and it can look to the eye like the recording would have to have a large offset but when you check the stats it doesn't. 

It is easy to get a read on it just by pulling the stats on a file in your editor and easy to correct.  See the other recent thread about correcting in Audition. 

Gear:
Audio:
Schoeps MK4V
Nak CM-100/CM-300 w/ CP-1's or CP-4's
SP-CMC-25
>
Oade C mod R-44  OR
Tinybox > Sony PCM-M10 (formerly Roland R-05) 
Video: Varied, with various outboard mics depending on the situation

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2017, 12:43:51 PM »
Thanks for the info guys.  Bottom line: is the above anything to worry about?
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

mfrench

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2017, 02:05:29 PM »
That image shows a plot of voltage over time, with the change in voltage representing pressure variations. See how the area you've circled undulates above and below the zero voltage line?  The center of undulation indicates the average voltage value.  If that center value was constantly above or below the zero voltage line over the entire length of the file, it would indicate the presence of DC offset.  A recording system intentionally sensitive to zero-hertz pressure variations acts as a barometer.  Since audio recording systems are designed to measure pressure variations only in the audible range, with a sensitivity that intentionally drops off to nothing before reaching zero hertz, significant DC offset in an audio recording system indicates something may be incorrect in the signal chain.  Or that Jimmy Cliff is in town.



In a van down by the river of babylon.

carry on.

Offline perks

  • Trade Count: (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5171
    • Recordings uploaded to TTD
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2017, 02:21:40 PM »
I'm a bit dense but is this due to the pressure (SPL) is going to drop on you?
Mics: Schoeps MK5's, Schoeps MK41's, AT853's (C,SC,H,O), DPA 4061's
Preamps/converters: Schoeps VMS52UB (x2), Nbox (x2), E.A.A. PSP-2 (x2) Grace Lunatec V2, Sound Devices MP-2, DPA MMA6000, Naiant Tinybox v1.5, Naiant PiPsqueak, Church Ugly, Apogee Mini-Me, Benchmark AD2k+
Recorders: Tascam DR-680, Korg MR-1, Edirol R-05, Sony PCM-M10 (x2), Tascam DR-07, Marantz PMD-661, Sound Devices Mixpre-3

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2017, 02:40:01 PM »
Cuban missile crisis as alternate metaphor- When your ports get blocked the pressure gonna rise!

heathen, no offset worries in the file you posted the image from.  And minor amounts of offset like those mentioned above with regards to various preamps and recorders and sources which produce somewhat asymmetrical waveforms such as horns are likewise not a problem.  Like Bombiggity suggests, if you suspect an issue, the easiest way to check is to take a look at the file/waveform stats.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Probably a dumb question (DC offset)
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2017, 12:13:40 AM »
I often forget to do the waveform analysis when I'm using WL6 or SF10, but its certainly helpful at times! I have honestly NEVER had to apply DC Offset that I'm aware of? I do remember doing it a few times back in the day like 10-15 years ago when I first started using WL4, just because it was something to try, and I never heard an audible difference between running WL DC Offset or not! But that doesn't mean that it's not useful! Ive only recorded to cassette/microcassette a few times back in the mid-90's, but I quickly moved up to a Sony TCD-D8 DAT shortly after that, and I've never noticed needing to do a DC Offset since being in the digital format of the DAT>HDD>CF Card>SD Card era's! So according to yinz guys in this thread, I should be OK not doing it for the most part, since it seems to affect analog recordings more than digital!

But I'm glad that I opened and read this thread, because I want to start doing a little bit more of the waveform analysis more than I was using it! Thanks for all of the info too :)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 34 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF