I've been supprised that the internal mics on the DR2d are as decent as they are. How do you know the mics on the DR40 are "much better"?
Just from people's feedback on this site
Syncing files from two seperate machines can be a pain. Much easier to record on one machine if you can manage that. A bit of extra effort to make that happen will pay off. Are you certain you really need mics out in the audience (the AUD+sbd approach)? Try it both ways to find out if its worth that effort, mics in the audience may not necessarily be better (the SBD+aud approach).
I agree, but will have to wait and see ( I did run two DR-2D's back in Aug. when the board was so far back I know the crowd would overpower the band sound wise. This is based on last years experience at same festival...).
But I have not gotten around to trying to sync the two as of yet...
Overall I like AUD recording better so I kind of lean in that direction when recording.
On nights I have only been able, for one reason or another, been able to get a SBD feed, I don't enjoy the recording as much as an AUD one.
But I love mixing the two.
This is outside? Bleed from nearby stages at a festival or other environmental noises?
"Bleed" was for lack of a better term and for brevity.
Should have said that the sound dissipates outside where it does not inside.
Again, lack of better term...
[/quote]
I couldnt agree more! I LOVE DAUD recordings. SBDs are routinely "dry" and "sterile"! I would much rather have an AUD recording. Now when its possible to mix the SBD/AUD sources, I LOVE those recordings. I usually go 60% AUD and 40% SBD, but every recording is different
I have two M10s and believe it or not, they sync VERY EASILY in post
I have talked to others who have used two M10s and synched them in post, and their experiences were the same as mine. Super easy to sync in post
Never used two DR2Ds tho, so I have zero experience with those
Obviously, the best way to do it would be AUD/SBD into the same DR2D. But thats not always possible!