When did I say it wasn't?
All I stated, as others here have, as that there is no evidence that they (pre's in general) improve the sound quality.
I think I did state, that in a situation where you are getting a weak signal in, they would be a benefit...why wouldn't they?
But it seems that the general idea is that they IMPROVE your shit in every situation. This is what I argue...apparently you missed that.
I'm not quite sure how my statements turned into a personal attack on Chris Church?? Maybe you could tell me?
I'm not in the position to have to prove anything,and that's by design.
Unfortunately, you as a manufacturer of products are..when asked ( that's if I was talking to you to begin with, which I wasn't)
I quite aware of the preamps on the MDs,that's one of the two reasons I use them.
You seem to get immediately too defensive against any opposing opinions,which will now cost you a quite fudgy thick slice of brownie.
Obviously, I have no insight as to your business,but to answer your question as to why you've sold "X" amounts of units...my guess would be the price.
So,basically..I guess my ultimate question to you is ..if taper "X" is recording shows has adequate signal coming in time after time, and levels are always fine..do you suggest a preamp ?
If so..why?
(And can that be proven?)
Or is the preamp ESSENTIALLY to boost the gain on a weak signal?
And you removed any chances of that "Great Lakes" 6 pack.