Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?  (Read 4408 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aladar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 108
The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« on: October 10, 2009, 06:37:58 AM »
Hi,
I'm just wondering what's the "best" way to split whole show into tracks? I have about 5 shows I could use splitting on. :) Should I just go the old select-and-cut method, or is there any "faster" or more precise way?

Offline vanark

  • TDS
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 8517
  • If you ain't right, you better get right!
    • The Mudboy Grotto - North Mississippi Allstar fan site
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2009, 08:52:55 AM »
CD Wave is very simple to use.
If you have a problem relating to the Live Music Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/etree) please send an e-mail to us admins at LMA(AT)archive(DOT)org or post in the LMA thread here and we'll get on it.

Link to LMA Recordings

Link to Team Dirty South Recordings on the LMA

Mics: Microtech Gefell M21 (with Nbob actives) | Church Audio CA-11 (cards) (with CA UBB)
Pres: babynbox
Recorders: Tascam DR-60D | Tascam DR-40 | Sony PCM-A10 | Edirol R-4

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2009, 09:19:07 AM »
If you use cut and paste as a new file for each track you are doing it the hard way, and probably creating sector boundry errors.

Use a program like CD Wave and it will allow you to mark where you want the splits, name the files sequentially for you, and not cause any SBE's.

Like vanark said, it is very simple to use.

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline Aladar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2009, 12:13:21 PM »
Thanks! It really is way easier! :D

Offline Sparge Master

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2143
  • Gender: Male
    • Sparge Master's List
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2009, 05:20:12 PM »
What is a good mac based program for doing this? Thanks
AT853Rx > MP-2 > modSBM1 > D8
7.5Gallon Pot > Sparging Bucket > 7.5Gallon Pot > Counter Flow Wort Chiller > 6.5Gallon Carboy > 5Gallon Carboy > Cornelius Keg > Tap > Glass > Mouth

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2009, 08:08:50 PM »
For free, Audacity... I use Sound Studio, which I bought for like $35 (version 2) but now version 3 is $80. A little steep for just tracking. :-\

Alternately, you could figure out where you want to put your split points, write a cue sheet, and feed it into xACT on the "shntool" tab, using the split function.
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline Sparge Master

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2143
  • Gender: Male
    • Sparge Master's List
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2009, 09:52:50 PM »
so audacity cuts on sector boundaries?
AT853Rx > MP-2 > modSBM1 > D8
7.5Gallon Pot > Sparging Bucket > 7.5Gallon Pot > Counter Flow Wort Chiller > 6.5Gallon Carboy > 5Gallon Carboy > Cornelius Keg > Tap > Glass > Mouth

Offline vanark

  • TDS
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 8517
  • If you ain't right, you better get right!
    • The Mudboy Grotto - North Mississippi Allstar fan site
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2009, 10:10:36 PM »
so audacity cuts on sector boundaries?

I have never done it, but I think if you turn on the Snap To feature, it will not create SBE's
If you have a problem relating to the Live Music Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/etree) please send an e-mail to us admins at LMA(AT)archive(DOT)org or post in the LMA thread here and we'll get on it.

Link to LMA Recordings

Link to Team Dirty South Recordings on the LMA

Mics: Microtech Gefell M21 (with Nbob actives) | Church Audio CA-11 (cards) (with CA UBB)
Pres: babynbox
Recorders: Tascam DR-60D | Tascam DR-40 | Sony PCM-A10 | Edirol R-4

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2009, 01:22:24 AM »
It doesn't necessarily, but xACT will fix SBE's while it creates FLACs, if you use the "fix SBE" tab.
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline Scooter123

  • "I am not an alcoholic. I am a drunk. Drunks don't go to meetings."
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3790
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2009, 03:26:39 AM »
Fastest and Easiest is never the most accurate.  I am very persnickity to where my splits are, e.g., right before the song starts, which might include a brief introduction, "This next song is a cut we did off our second album....." No software is going to do that for me, I bracket the applause section and place the split, a cue point in Goldwave, right on the money.
Regards,
Scooter123

mk41 > N Box  > Sony M-10
mk4 > N Box > Sony M-10

dorrcoq

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2009, 03:47:32 PM »
Fastest and Easiest is never the most accurate.  I am very persnickity to where my splits are, e.g., right before the song starts, which might include a brief introduction, "This next song is a cut we did off our second album....." No software is going to do that for me, I bracket the applause section and place the split, a cue point in Goldwave, right on the money.

And why can't you do that with CD Wave?  You can advance sector by sector until you get the spot you want.

Offline Əkoostikal

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 680
  • Gender: Male
  • One of these days....
Re: The fastest and easiest way to split tracks?
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2009, 12:02:41 AM »
What is a good mac based program for doing this? Thanks

Amadeus Pro..... you can drop markes, then with one step you can align them all so you get no sbe's..... You can then split by markers to wav, flac, aiff.... ect..... It can also make a .cue and xAct can be used to split if desired. I love the fact that it can make a .cue. I always like having those to save with masters.
BONGWATER via Etree:

"Phil Keeps on growing, never even slowing, never really knowing all of the minds he's really blowing!!!!!"

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF