Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?  (Read 5079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fatah Ruark (aka MIKE B)

  • (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9632
  • Gender: Male
  • I dream in beige.
    • sloppy.art.ink
128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« on: October 25, 2009, 06:00:37 PM »
Which is better: a 128kbps webstream or straight FM broadcast.

I'd like to record a local radio broadcast, and I'd like to get the best version.
||| MICS:  Beyer CK930 ~ DPA 4080 ~ Nevaton MCE400 ~ Countryman B3 ~ Sennheiser Ambeo Headset |||
||| CABLES: Kind Kables |||
||| PREAMPS: Naiant Tinybox | Naiant Littlebox | Naiant IPA | Church BB |||
||| DECKS: Sound Devices MixPre6 | Sony M10 | iPod Touch 32GB |||
||| PLAYBACK: Outlaw Audio RR2150 > Epos ELS8 |||
||| PHOTO: Sony a6000 | Sony 16-50 | Sony 55-210 | Rokinon 14mm | Rokinon 8mm |||
|||Concert History || LMA Recordings || Live YouTube |||

Offline illconditioned

  • (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2934
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2009, 06:25:10 PM »
Which is better: a 128kbps webstream or straight FM broadcast.

I'd like to record a local radio broadcast, and I'd like to get the best version.
My vote is for the FM.  It just sounds more "real" or "lifelike" to me...

 Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4319
  • Gender: Male
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2009, 06:32:19 PM »
it depends on the radio station.  During broadcast they use signal processors and other goofy shit for compression and EQ.  I also think FM frequency is limited to 15kHz.   A good 128k mp3 stream might be the way to go.
Audio-Technica AT8022-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline illconditioned

  • (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2934
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2009, 07:00:14 PM »
it depends on the radio station.  During broadcast they use signal processors and other goofy shit for compression and EQ.  I also think FM frequency is limited to 15kHz.   A good 128k mp3 stream might be the way to go.
I'm thinking FM is better because it is *analog* limitations/distortion, no digital due to MP3 compression.  I can really hear a difference on CBC, listening to FM vs. Online.  The Online may even be better than 128k too.  I'm not sure.

  Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline page

  • (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2009, 08:25:30 PM »
it depends on the radio station.  During broadcast they use signal processors and other goofy shit for compression and EQ.  I also think FM frequency is limited to 15kHz.   A good 128k mp3 stream might be the way to go.
I'm thinking FM is better because it is *analog* limitations/distortion, no digital due to MP3 compression.  I can really hear a difference on CBC, listening to FM vs. Online.  The Online may even be better than 128k too.  I'm not sure.

  Richard

I'm with Richard on this one, FM tops 128k streaming any day of the week. I've taped off of both before and hands down it's going to be better. Part of the reason is the odds that they do a seperate mix for the online stream are slim, so you've got the processing already done, plus the MP3 compression (and not LAME compression) on top of it.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline deadheaded

  • (14)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 823
  • Gender: Male
    • Kind Kables
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2009, 01:43:53 AM »
E-Town?
If it's worth getting off the couch, it's worth taping!

Offline Wiggler

  • (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1314
  • Gender: Male
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2009, 08:48:43 AM »
I also feel Fm is considerably better.
The problem is that most fm tuners these days are not worth a crap.
Magnum dynalab makes some of the best tuners I've ever heard.
http://www.magnumdynalab.com/

Offline rhinowing

  • (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4175
  • Gender: Male
    • SPLRA - Smashing Pumpkins Live Recording Association
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2009, 01:17:32 PM »
I'm not sure about other area, but all the stations around here that do webcasts are in mono, while the fm tends to be stereo
Please contact me if you've ever taped the Smashing Pumpkins or a related group!

Offline Giant_Rick

  • (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 148
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2009, 08:22:59 AM »
I prefer the FM broadcast much more than a 128k webcast.. I can hear the difference.
But if the webcast is higher than 192k the difference comes smaller to me, and if it's 320k I can hear almost no difference.

And FM is stereo almost anywhere.. don't know about the webcast.

Offline Fatah Ruark (aka MIKE B)

  • (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9632
  • Gender: Male
  • I dream in beige.
    • sloppy.art.ink
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2009, 04:00:52 PM »
E-Town?

Yep.

I guess I could always record BOTH.  :P

eTown is broadcast on 3 different stations in Boulder. I get good reception on all of them via FM. Still there is occasional static. I should check out the webcasts from some stations not around Boulder. I guess there could be a better one.
||| MICS:  Beyer CK930 ~ DPA 4080 ~ Nevaton MCE400 ~ Countryman B3 ~ Sennheiser Ambeo Headset |||
||| CABLES: Kind Kables |||
||| PREAMPS: Naiant Tinybox | Naiant Littlebox | Naiant IPA | Church BB |||
||| DECKS: Sound Devices MixPre6 | Sony M10 | iPod Touch 32GB |||
||| PLAYBACK: Outlaw Audio RR2150 > Epos ELS8 |||
||| PHOTO: Sony a6000 | Sony 16-50 | Sony 55-210 | Rokinon 14mm | Rokinon 8mm |||
|||Concert History || LMA Recordings || Live YouTube |||

dorrcoq

  • Guest
  • (0)
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2009, 04:07:50 PM »
I get good reception on all of them via FM. Still there is occasional static.

My first thought was that the FM feed is a lot more consistent and stable than the few webcasts I've tired to listen to.

Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3690
  • Gender: Male
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2009, 09:31:42 AM »
I say FM is very clear but what are you playing over the air? 128k mp3s? If that's the case, don't waste your time with such an expensive setup.

Do you have an hp120? Tune it into the radio station and you can record to the hard drive directly. I think that's a feature that is not well known about.
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

Offline spyder9

  • (78)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 13002
  • Gender: Male
  • "Are you Zman?"
    • My Archived shows
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2009, 12:42:41 PM »
FM.  Nice and warm.  I just picked up a mid 80's Onkyo T-22 tuner.  Back to phatness. 

Webcasts are stale, IMO.  Gawd knows how many ADC > DAC > ADC conversions are going on before it hits your ears.

Offline Fatah Ruark (aka MIKE B)

  • (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9632
  • Gender: Male
  • I dream in beige.
    • sloppy.art.ink
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2009, 12:25:25 PM »
I ended up only recording the webcast. I couldn't get it to record on my desktop so I had to use the headphone out > FR2LE. I think it's more than listenable.

The recording is an etown broadcast with Warren Haynes as the guest. I was at the show so it's nice to have something from it.

Here is a link to the MP3's I made. Don't ask me why I converted them to V0. I recorded them as a WAV file on the FR2LE, and then chopped them into tracks on CDWave, and just ran those through dbPowerAmp and I had it set to V0...so I just left it.

https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=YkxMa3ZOWkJCMTUzZUE9PQ
||| MICS:  Beyer CK930 ~ DPA 4080 ~ Nevaton MCE400 ~ Countryman B3 ~ Sennheiser Ambeo Headset |||
||| CABLES: Kind Kables |||
||| PREAMPS: Naiant Tinybox | Naiant Littlebox | Naiant IPA | Church BB |||
||| DECKS: Sound Devices MixPre6 | Sony M10 | iPod Touch 32GB |||
||| PLAYBACK: Outlaw Audio RR2150 > Epos ELS8 |||
||| PHOTO: Sony a6000 | Sony 16-50 | Sony 55-210 | Rokinon 14mm | Rokinon 8mm |||
|||Concert History || LMA Recordings || Live YouTube |||

Offline SmokinJoe

  • (63)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4203
  • Gender: Male
  • "75 and sunny"... life is so much simpler.
    • uploads to archive.org
Re: 128k webstream vs. FM broadcast?
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2009, 10:42:26 PM »
FM radio doesn't go *** buffering ***....
Mics: Schoeps MK4 & CMC5's / Gefell M200's & M210's / ADK-TL / DPA4061's
Pres: V3 / ST9100
Decks: Oade Concert Mod R4Pro / R09 / R05
Big Rig: split snake > Focusrite & Presonus Pres > ADAT > Alesis HD-24 > Protools 11
Daughter's rig:  AT4050ST > Busman Hybrid R4
Photo: Nikon D700's, 2.8 Zooms, and Zeiss primes
Playback: Raspberry Pi > Modi2 Uber > Magni2 > HD650

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2021 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF