Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Maha Powerex AA's vs. Maha Imedion AA's  (Read 2497 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Drgiggles1

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • Gender: Male
Maha Powerex AA's vs. Maha Imedion AA's
« on: March 16, 2012, 01:22:51 AM »
Are they both slow discharge ?
One better than the other ?
Major differences ?

I just got the Maha MH-C9000 smart charger that came with 4 2700 mah batteries. Curious if I would be better off with Imedion's or it don't matter. Primary use would be M10 and DR-2d recorders. Thanks in advance.
Mics: CA-14 (o,c,o)
Remote Power: CA-9100 pre-amp, CA-UBB battery box
Recorders: Sony PCM-M10, Tascam DR-2d
Cable/s: custom 6" GAKables Mini Starquad
Batteries: Maha 9.6V Imedion, Maha Powerex 2700 mAh
Chargers: Maha MH-C9000, MAHA MH-C490F 9 Volt

Offline drewloo

  • Friend of Salsa
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3029
  • it's recreational
Re: Maha Powerex AA's vs. Maha Imedion AA's
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 01:26:20 PM »
Only the Imedions are slow-discharge.  In general you trade lower self-discharge for slightly lower capacity.  As long as you are able to charge the powerex batteries within a day of when you need to use them you're good.  The Imedions shine in uses like clocks or emergency flashlight that's put in a drawer and seldom used.  One nice thing about the powerex 2700s is that they actually test out at 2800-2950 mah (mine do, anyway).
You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer.  -FZ

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.115 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2018 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF