Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: CA STC pres vs. SP-PASM-2  (Read 1351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jagraham

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2872
  • Gender: Male
CA STC pres vs. SP-PASM-2
« on: February 09, 2013, 05:07:29 PM »
Anyone ever use the SP-PASM-2?  There's one for sale in the YS and I'm curious as to how it compares to the STC-9000 and STC-9200.  I'm very happy with the Church pres.  Would I have any use to have the SP pre?  The only difference is it appears the SP pre has gain of +29 and +50.  Now sure if I would ever need +50db, is this preamp more aimed towards recording very quiet performances?
Mics: Nak CM-300s, Nak CM-100s, CP-1s, CP-2s, AT-853s(Cards, Hypers, Omnis) CA-14s(Cards, Omnis)
Pres: CA STC-9200, CA-UBB
Recorders: Tascam DR-70D, DR-2D, Edirol R-09

ISO: 1 Teac ME-120, CP-3 Caps, AT-853 Subcard Caps

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40700
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: CA STC pres vs. SP-PASM-2
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2013, 10:56:26 PM »
I say stick with your CA pres. Theyve been proven reliable and compact :)
Recording Gear:
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250/0 KCY's ->
Naiant +60v/Low Noise PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3 ->
SanDisk 128gb Extreme Pro & 64gb Ultra Plus SDXC-I

Portable Playback Gear:
Campfire Audio Andromeda & Dorado IEM's >
Linum G2 SuperBax & Bax {3.5mm} | FiiO LC 2.5c {2.5mm} >
Shanling Audio M5s | Sony NW-A35 DAP's

DAW:
Dell Inspiron 15 5570-5521 Laptop
(Pentium i5/8gb RAM/256gb SSD)

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA STC pres vs. SP-PASM-2
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2013, 08:15:28 AM »
If you need 50dB of gain, you're gonna just run MIC IN at that point. :)

I'm with Bean, I'd say stick with what you've got -- if it's a 9200, most definitely because it's quieter than the 9100.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.022 seconds with 45 queries.
© 2002-2020 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF