I'll take a look. Unfortunately much of my storage is offline currently.
I do remember my personal take away, which was this-
The reduced bass sensitivity of the 4098 at a distance actually worked better than I though it would in that particular room to tame overly active subs. I was able to EQ things to where I was happy with the recording using just those two mics, which is always one of my primary litmus tests. After bass EQ, these were still somewhat brighter overall than the MG210 pair, but not in a way which was shrill or out of control. Again, being manageable to achieve the tonal balance I was happy with without EQ frustrations. On the more subtle attributes, the Gefells remained unmatched for overall imaging smoothness and apparent depth perception (image depth, noticing front/back dimensional layering). The Gefells remain my reference cards and supercards. If I was using single stereo pairs, that difference would be more persuasive to me in many situations, but certainly not all. The way I'm using them in my multi-channel arrays that difference becomes more or less mute, and I don't think at all about a reduction in quality substituting them for the Geffs in those multichannel arrays, only about the reduction in size, weight, cost, and a greatly reduced vulnerability to dampness and foul weather.
Hope that helps.