Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: audacity>cdwave  (Read 382 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Taper Chris

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 166
  • Gender: Male
  • wusupwitit?
    • what I've posted on archive
audacity>cdwave
« on: January 12, 2017, 12:22:09 PM »
Why does the work get shortened by about 3.5 seconds per hour when transferring from audacity to cd wav?
Example, file is 02:04:53 but when I tracked it out on cd wave and put track list into winamp it totaled 02:04:46. I found out playing back on winamp. Everything is 44.1k 16b from recorder to audacity.  And if I put the audacity track into winamp the length of project is the same. Thanks.
"The thing about choosing the lesser of two evils is that your still choosing evil." JG

Offline Taper Chris

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 166
  • Gender: Male
  • wusupwitit?
    • what I've posted on archive
Re: audacity>cdwave
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2017, 01:26:33 PM »
I think its the winamp. I went to tracks folder, highlighted every track and went to properties. The total time for the tracks is 02:04:53. But whats interesting is the audacity track in winamp also came out to 02:04:53.
"The thing about choosing the lesser of two evils is that your still choosing evil." JG

Offline morst

  • Archivist: Camper Van Beethoven & Cracker
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2160
  • Get in touch if you wanna record Cracker or CVB!
    • Soundscape Preservation Society
Re: audacity>cdwave
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2017, 02:16:10 PM »
I bet it has to do with rounding seconds.

If we had three files that were 10.6 seconds long, one might say it's 33 seconds total (11 x 3) but one might only say 32 seconds (10.6 x 3, rounded up)
Teams: Neumann, Bay Area Tapers, Multitrack, Pioneertown Tapers, Mac Geeks, Cassette Masters, Poster Collectors, Alumni of teams St Louis, Upper Midwest & Milwaukee / Southern Wisco

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Is a 4 channel slut and
  • Trade Count: (117)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40375
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
Re: audacity>cdwave
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2017, 05:28:52 AM »
Chris, have you ever tried FooBar 2000? I would try that and see what the total length is :)
Schoeps MK4's & MK41's ->
Schoeps | NBob 250/05 KCY's ->
Schoeps VMS02IB | Naiant +60v PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Tascam DR-70D's ->
128gb & 64gb SanDisk Extreme Pro SD Cards

FiiO E10K DAC/HP Amp & E11K HP Amp ->
Sony MDR-7506 Cans & SA-VA15 Speakers | Monster iSport Victory Earbuds

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean | http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420 | http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php

Offline Taper Chris

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 166
  • Gender: Male
  • wusupwitit?
    • what I've posted on archive
Re: audacity>cdwave
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2017, 12:10:58 PM »
Chris, have you ever tried FooBar 2000? I would try that and see what the total length is :)

woooord. It seems to be the win amp, since the wav files properties ( I highlighted all 19 tracks ) say the tracks equal the untracked mix in time. So as long as the work flow and flac upload isn't corrupted, Ill be ok if my playback is a lil rounded up or down.

I'll see wsup w foobar though, thanks!!!!
"The thing about choosing the lesser of two evils is that your still choosing evil." JG

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.151 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2017 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF
Website Design by Foxtrot Media, Inc., a Baltimore Website Company