Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Audition or Audacity?  (Read 2440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan33185

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
    • http://mngneissrecordings.blogspot.com/
Audition or Audacity?
« on: December 10, 2018, 02:04:21 PM »
I've been using Adobe Audition to master shows as long as I've been recording, but I see a bunch of people here use Audacity as well. Is there an advantage to using one over the other, or does it just come down to personal preference?

Offline morst

  • Archivist: Camper Van Beethoven & Cracker
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3118
  • ISO ALL archival Cracker / CVB / Monks Of Doom etc
    • Soundscape Preservation Society
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2018, 04:47:17 PM »
Is the adobe product free, open source, and runs on mac, linux and pc?


Audacity meets those criteria.
Teams: Neumann, Bay Area Tapers, Multitrack, Pioneertown Tapers, Mac Geeks, Cassette Masters, Poster Collectors, Alumni of teams St Louis, Upper Midwest & Milwaukee / Southern Wisco

Offline Dan33185

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
    • http://mngneissrecordings.blogspot.com/
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2018, 12:05:09 AM »
Is the adobe product free, open source, and runs on mac, linux and pc?


Audacity meets those criteria.

No, but let's pretend all things are equal as far as price and OS for the sake of this thread. I'm just asking about the actual programs, nothing else.

Offline wforwumbo

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2018, 02:06:57 PM »
The correct answer is, use whichever tools and methodologies you find most appropriate. I use Logic, because that's what is the easiest workflow for me and gets me the sound I want. The above comment points out some benefits to using Audacity, but the same argument can be made for Reaper; I don't think one tool is inherently "better" or "worse" than the other, and it isn't necessarily the sole reason why you should or shouldn't use a program. Both are different and have their purposes. I don't think Audition and Audacity are equivocal, both accomplish different skill sets and different work flows. I say use whatever works best for you and gets you the sound you want, just like taper gear.
2x Schoeps mk21 (matched pair) -> nbob KCY -> Naiant PFA -> Sound Devices Mixpre 6

Offline 108Ω

  • + pace, amore e felicita +
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10323
  • Gender: Male
  • Waiting on the next cladogenetic event...
    • Oceana North America
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2018, 07:10:32 PM »
Audition, if this is a "which do you like better" thread.
I have a bunch of workflows and filter sets built-out already and it makes life easier

Wavelab also a favorite
Soundforge, and Samplitude-Sequoia are also on my "familiar and like" list

I still use CD-Wave for tracking, yup, I'm a fossil...

"Peace is for everyone"
        - Norah Jones
"We tape to taste life twice, in the moment and in retrospect"
                      (with apologies to Anais Nin)

Offline morst

  • Archivist: Camper Van Beethoven & Cracker
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3118
  • ISO ALL archival Cracker / CVB / Monks Of Doom etc
    • Soundscape Preservation Society
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2018, 12:06:32 AM »
Teams: Neumann, Bay Area Tapers, Multitrack, Pioneertown Tapers, Mac Geeks, Cassette Masters, Poster Collectors, Alumni of teams St Louis, Upper Midwest & Milwaukee / Southern Wisco

Offline Dan33185

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Male
    • http://mngneissrecordings.blogspot.com/
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2018, 03:05:13 AM »
Audition, if this is a "which do you like better" thread.
I have a bunch of workflows and filter sets built-out already and it makes life easier

Wavelab also a favorite
Soundforge, and Samplitude-Sequoia are also on my "familiar and like" list

I still use CD-Wave for tracking, yup, I'm a fossil...



Hey, same here! Guess I'm a fossil as well  :lol:

Offline Ben Turnbull

  • Don't ask me about Audacity...
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8903
  • Gender: Male
  • A Clark Nova ate my lunch... Don't ask, just pee
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2018, 06:13:21 AM »
CDwav is still relevant IMO. Easy tracking with the advantage of being able to write flacs and produce cue sheets.  Audition 3.0 was free for a while but that link may have gone away. I like it as I think the multi tracking is more intuitive. It presents as a more mature interface but I haven't seen everything so it may very well be just dated.   :shrug:
Only seeing two shows a month now...
-My name is Ben, and I'm an AQhaulic ranting hysterically in my dotage ...
Read "Toward the End of Time" by Updike to know my name sake.
Official Archivist for Jazz Central Studios, MinniMN
DPA4021/SKM140/NakCM1k/ADK A51s/Countryman B3/ATes943/SPc4(och)/S'lux s502... >
TinyBox OT> PCM-M10/DR-680/R4/T+mod UA5 needs attention

Offline ThePiedPiper

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 218
  • Gender: Male
    • Flute In The Gallery
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2018, 08:36:48 AM »
Audition 3.0 for me is my go to program. Like 108Ω said WaveLab is very good. CDWaveEditor for tracking ... it's still (for me) the best method.  I also use a program called AddAWav for when I need to join (vs splitting) files.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2018, 08:40:14 AM by ThePiedPiper »
Naiant X-X Omni-Directional Mics > Sound Professionals SP-SPSB-10 Micro-Mini 12vdc Power Supply > Unistar Lil’ Red Whip Connector > Zoom F1 MicroSD Recorder (24BIT, 96kHz) > 32GB Kingston MicroSD Card.

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (36)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5926
  • Gender: Male
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2018, 09:10:05 AM »
Audition 3.0 was free for a while but that link may have gone away. I like it as I think the multi tracking is more intuitive. It presents as a more mature interface but I haven't seen everything so it may very well be just dated.   :shrug:

The old Adobe link to access AA3.0 and Photoshop CS2 isn't accessible via the Wayback Machine anymore.

However, there is the following Adobe link below that appears to allow you to download AA3.0 (and others).  Serial numbers are available on the right column.  You must first click the 'Accept' box since the files are no longer supported by Adobe.

https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/cs2-product-downloads.html?promoid=19SCDRQK#download-products

Offline Ben Turnbull

  • Don't ask me about Audacity...
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8903
  • Gender: Male
  • A Clark Nova ate my lunch... Don't ask, just pee
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2018, 06:57:46 AM »
^ I  only see Acrobat and Creative Suites linked. Is Audition part of the CS?
Only seeing two shows a month now...
-My name is Ben, and I'm an AQhaulic ranting hysterically in my dotage ...
Read "Toward the End of Time" by Updike to know my name sake.
Official Archivist for Jazz Central Studios, MinniMN
DPA4021/SKM140/NakCM1k/ADK A51s/Countryman B3/ATes943/SPc4(och)/S'lux s502... >
TinyBox OT> PCM-M10/DR-680/R4/T+mod UA5 needs attention

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (36)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5926
  • Gender: Male
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2018, 09:47:37 AM »
^ Click the "I Accept" box, then below click the language of choice.  Once you do that, an entire list of programs is generated, including Audition 3.0 and Photoshop CS2.

edit - I should state that I am still using Audition 3.0 from the old (inactive) link.  However, this newer link appears to offer the same applications. 

Let me know how it works out.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2018, 09:50:31 AM by audBall »

Offline u2_fly_2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 433
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2019, 03:53:53 PM »
Audacity is free and have all basic features a sound editor needs.

Adobe is based on the old "Cool Edit"-software and is really good and professional sound editing software which have everything you need in one programme.
Soundprofessionals Audio Technica AT 943 (SP-CMC-8) External Stereo Microphones > SP-SPSB-10-80020
Sound Professionals Micro-mini microphone power supply with mini 12vdc battery and 24 inch hardwired output cable Soundprofessionals Batterybox >> Olympus Ls-10 Linear Recorder > 4 GB > 24 Bit / 48 Khz  > 24 Bit / 96 Khz

Zoom Q3 HD - 1080p / 96-24 Bit

Roland R-26 (96 / 24 Bit)

Sony PCM-D100 (192 / 24 Bit)

Offline Ben Turnbull

  • Don't ask me about Audacity...
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8903
  • Gender: Male
  • A Clark Nova ate my lunch... Don't ask, just pee
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2019, 06:01:21 PM »
Kind of a HiJack, but one thing I've found with Audition 3.0.1 is that if you ever  have a set of show tracks that you want to work as a single file again, there is an option under FILE to "Open Appended".  Be alert... that first 01 track will invariably be found somewhere after the file that gets inserted in the editing window. Sometimes the last file is "first" then the 01, other times it's a mess. Very frustrating to sort out. I see no way to teach it to do otherwise.

I don't use this tool that much so it's just a warning, not a prohibition towards Audition.

Good Luck
Only seeing two shows a month now...
-My name is Ben, and I'm an AQhaulic ranting hysterically in my dotage ...
Read "Toward the End of Time" by Updike to know my name sake.
Official Archivist for Jazz Central Studios, MinniMN
DPA4021/SKM140/NakCM1k/ADK A51s/Countryman B3/ATes943/SPc4(och)/S'lux s502... >
TinyBox OT> PCM-M10/DR-680/R4/T+mod UA5 needs attention

Offline nassau73

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Re: Audition or Audacity?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2019, 06:01:28 PM »
Kind of a HiJack, but one thing I've found with Audition 3.0.1 is that if you ever  have a set of show tracks that you want to work as a single file again, there is an option under FILE to "Open Appended".  Be alert... that first 01 track will invariably be found somewhere after the file that gets inserted in the editing window. Sometimes the last file is "first" then the 01, other times it's a mess. Very frustrating to sort out. I see no way to teach it to do otherwise.

I don't use this tool that much so it's just a warning, not a prohibition towards Audition.

Good Luck

Just to "possibly" help clarify the above -

The option "Open Append" will add/append the new file you are opening to the end of the file or files you already have opened. Append as many files as you like.

You can then "Save As" a new file and all the files will be in the order you appended. Remember to tick the "Save Non Audio Information" box when doing your "Save As" otherwise you will lose all your track markers.

The confusion can arise when once you are done with your editing session and want to - once again - save all the tracks as individual files.

In order to save everything INDIVIDUALLY and in correct order, you need to add a track marker at the very beginning AND at the very end of your saved appended file.

Then go to the "Window > Marker List" dropdown menu item.
Select all your files - don't move anything around. The track markers you added at the end and beginning may look out of sequence but don't worry.
Click the "Merge Button"
Then click the "Save" button

Now you can choose where to save your files. Compose a File Name and choose to start the numbering at 1.


 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.227 seconds with 42 queries.
© 2002-2019 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF