Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder  (Read 1884 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12971
  • Gender: Male
Re: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder
« Reply #15 on: January 14, 2019, 03:35:51 PM »
If you could just have the absolute basic features than contribute to a high quality recording, what would they be?

Sufficient channel count, sufficient mic power, transparent/low-noise preamps, the functional equivalent of Zaxcom "never clip" to avoid the need to think about levels until afterward, record/stop transport control, visual confirmation of recording and confirmation of signal to each chanel, and sufficient battery power.  That's about it. 

The specifics will be different for different folks. For instance, sufficient channel count for me is 4 to 6 (5 to 8 prefered), and sufficient mic power is 5V PIP (no need for phantom or balanced).

-----------------------------------------------------

Beyond that, I dream of a distributed "node" recording system eliminating the need for wired connections, requiring only minimal wireless bandwidth for control, with the capability of each node to continue to free-run if/when the wireless signal drops out.

For open taping each node would act like pretty much like the simple single-channel XLR input "plug-on recorders" which attach directly to the microphone, providing local battery, phantom-powering, and storage, yet with the  ability to maintain 48kHz sample-level sync via a combination of wireless sync and free-run clock accuracy, wireless transport control, and wireless status confirmation.  Associate any number of nodes with the control app and end up with sample accurate clock-sync'd recordings on each of them.

Advanced miniature version would include a pair of built-in, high-quality, low-voltage miniature microphones in each node (Mid/Side with choice of Mid pattern, or omni + hyper for dial-a-pattern), and each node being approximately the size of the miniature DPA boundary mount.  Think DPA d:vice with embedded microphones, battery, recorder, and wireless control.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<<

Offline ideal77dlr

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 82
  • Gender: Male
  • Mo To The Fo
Re: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2019, 11:40:23 AM »
Does anyone stealth with the MixPre3?

If so, how do you get it in? Particularly in Europe - patdowns, detectors etc...

PM responses please!
Sony D7 DAT : Edirol R-09HR : CA-11s (cards & OMNIs): CA-14s : SP-CMC-2s : CA-1900

Online jerryfreak

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2051
  • I'm a llama! (taboot)
Re: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2019, 07:13:37 AM »
Beyond that, I dream of a distributed "node" recording system eliminating the need for wired connections, requiring only minimal wireless bandwidth for control, with the capability of each node to continue to free-run if/when the wireless signal drops out.

isnt that what "jam" time code does? im no video guy but in the manuals for the lectrosonics PDR model it says that you are supposed to "JAM" timecode prior to recording then disconnect the clock in while recording. it seems like its more of a marker than a clock sync over time

When the distance is extreme or using a wireless microphone
is not practical, the PDR recorder can travel
with your subject and capture professional quality audio,
synchronized with timecode. It’s tiny size is unobtrusive
and easily placed in garments and costumes, and easy
to conceal when used as a “plant” microphone to capture
environmental or location sound.
With a time code sync at the start of the production, the
audio track is easily placed accurately in the timeline of a
video clip. The industry standard .wav (BWF) file format
is compatible with essentially any audio or video editing
software.




also as you mentioned in the d:vice thread the apogee metarecorder bluetooth syncs multiple devices, spec is up to 10 meters. i have connected 2 iphones and walked across my house, they disconnected but both kept recording, thats the extent of my testing

« Last Edit: January 21, 2019, 08:43:40 AM by jerryfreak »
in:
small: MK4V/41V > CMR > Tinybox or PiP Squeak or J.Williams Mod MicMan Jr or no pre at all >AD2K or R07 or PCM-A10
smaller: 4061/4099 CORE > d:vice MMA

out:
home:Benchmark DAC1 HGC > Dynaudio BM15A active monitors
shop: Musical Fidelity VLink 192 Asynchronyous> coax> DAC1 > Rokit RP8 active monitors

current goals:making CMR+battery box rig interface with d:vice

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 2478
Re: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2019, 07:48:52 AM »
You’d never get the MixPre3 into any venue in Europe - everything is detectors, pat downs, wands and equipment being examined now. Even in an open taping situation you’d have security questioning what it is.

You’d need something smaller.

Can't confirm this. The regular reaction when open taping with a mixpre-6 used to be:
"How much is it? I want one..."

My experience is similar to if_then_else.  The security guys never give me, or my gear, a second look when I am open taping.  As far as the venues, maybe it depends on where you are in Europe.  Very few here have detectors and pat downs are pretty perfunctory; I have yet to encounter a wand.  A lot of places have quick bag checks, but even they are pretty cursory.  They are mostly looking for weapons and outside booze.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12971
  • Gender: Male
Re: The case for a super-small, basic high quality recorder
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2019, 03:43:43 PM »
Beyond that, I dream of a distributed "node" recording system eliminating the need for wired connections, requiring only minimal wireless bandwidth for control, with the capability of each node to continue to free-run if/when the wireless signal drops out.

isnt that what "jam" time code does? im no video guy but in the manuals for the lectrosonics PDR model it says that you are supposed to "JAM" timecode prior to recording then disconnect the clock in while recording. it seems like its more of a marker than a clock sync over time.

I think so.  I've don't know much about time code, but as far as I'm aware it provides frame-rate level of synchronization rather than sample-level sync.  The important questions are how close in can it get and how close do we need?   Plenty of folks here are versed in alining and syncing two different clocked sources from separate non-sync'd recorders.   Absolute sync is critical for stereo pairs where sample level sync is needed to keep the two phase-accurate with correct correlation, but not as much so for two separate sources which are not directly correlated- like an main pair + an ambient hall sound pair or the like.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<<

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.151 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2019 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF