go with the 4s, i owned 41s for years and they mostly collected dust, if you need to use 41s your not in the right spot
^^^^^^
What I find interesting about alot of the responses in this thread that blindly say '41s period' is that if that's true then Schoeps wouldn't have a need to have included any other capsules in their line. They would have put an mk41 out and stopped right there. These responses give no regard, IMHO, to the basic rules of thumb that we spend hours and hours discussing about which capsule is best for which recording situation...unless the only variable anyone wants to discuss is decreasing crowd chatter. But imaging, soundstage, and overall sound quality are part of the equation too and
given the right applications IMHO mk4 always sound better than mk41. And when used in the right situations I think 21 always sound better than 4s.
Some are saying hypers on-stage sound great...OK they sound great but are they the best capsule for the job. No way. All things equal, MK4, mk22 or MK21 are going to sound better the vast majority of the time on stage. If you want to use that logic, then I'd just counter by saying...well MK4 sound great from the back of the room too, which can definitely be true. But from the back of the room, 41s are going to beat the 4, 22, or 21 probably every time. For a single capsule decision, it's about figuring out what will sound best in the rooms you record in MOST of the time, but I just disagree that one size fits all situations.
Having said all of the above, I tend to agree with the OPs conclusion that it sounds like 41's might be the best option for his particular recording situations.