Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: digi-noise  (Read 2975 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Big Muff

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Gender: Male
  • James Marshall Hendrix 1942 - 1970
digi-noise
« on: May 22, 2009, 06:23:45 PM »


Had this issue back in September.. replaced an opti-cable and all was well, till two days ago.

Any ideas on what maybe the cause?

 
Live rig: DPA 4021 > V3 > iHP-120

Vinyl rig: Music hall 5.1 w/acrylic platter > Ortofon Quintet Black > Pro-Ject Tube-Box II > V3 > UA-5

Offline tgakidis

  • Trade Count: (552)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5754
  • Gender: Male
    • My Recordings on the Archive:
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2009, 06:40:53 PM »
is it divi noise or RF (radio feq) noise?  RF noise happens from bad shields on analog mic and interconect cables.  I had that problem on my active cables but just had them fixed.
GAKables: Custom XLR, Digi & Batt Cables http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=133186.0

Mics:
Schoeps: CMC6 x 4, CMC1K x 2, KC 5G x 2, MK4,MK4V,MK41,MK21,MK22,MK8 x 2
Austrian Audio OC818 Dual Set+
Telefunken: TF-11 x 2, ELA M 260 x 4, M960FS x 2, TK60,TK61,TK62 x 2, M60,TK60 x2
AKG: c426b, AKG c34, nBob Actives>PFA x4, CK61,CK63,CK8 x 2
AT853 4.7k Mod (Card,Sub)
Pres:
Sonosax SX-AD8+ / Sonosax SX-M2D2 / Sonosax SX-M2 / Lunatec V3
Recs:
Sonosax SX-R4+ / Sound Devices MixPre-6ii / Marantz PMD-661 / Roland R-07 / Zoom F3

My Recordings: https://archive.org/search.php?query=taper%3A%28Gakidis%29&sort=-da

Offline Ekib

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 258
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2009, 04:57:37 PM »
Is Digi Noise the same thing as that specific noise on older DAT tapes ?
But I have to say, I don’t mind it. I do object when I see people sticking microphones up my nose, in the front row. If I see anyone doing that [laughs] I’m going to have security remove them. Because that’s just obnoxious. But I don’t mind if people come and discreetly at the back make a recording of it. And I know that it’s just for their own use, for the superfan.
(Steven Wilson , interview http://blog.musoscribe.com/index.php/2011/01/25/interview-steven-wilson-on-audience-taping/ )

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2009, 05:42:37 PM »
is it divi noise or RF (radio feq) noise?  RF noise happens from bad shields on analog mic and interconect cables.

Yep, this is radio interference, typically from a mobile phone.
I get this all the time when I forget to switch off mine before the gig.  :P I get the impression that the European (GSM) frequencies are more invasive to the H120 et al. Or is it just my imagination?

So technically, it's not diginoise. You can distinguish this from looking at the WAV and notice that the ambient sound is still present throughout. Diginoise would be more like glitches where all ambient sound was interrupted.
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Big Muff

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Gender: Male
  • James Marshall Hendrix 1942 - 1970
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2009, 08:03:27 PM »
Hmmm.
is it time to ditch the iriver??

what are my options?
where should i first look to make correction?
This doesn't always happen, but when it does, grrrrr.

Live rig: DPA 4021 > V3 > iHP-120

Vinyl rig: Music hall 5.1 w/acrylic platter > Ortofon Quintet Black > Pro-Ject Tube-Box II > V3 > UA-5

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2009, 02:53:01 AM »
where should i first look to make correction?

Switch off your phone before the gig, and don't stand too close to other people texting or talking on the phone.
The iriver is a great recorder, don't shoot the piano player  ;)
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Big Muff

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Gender: Male
  • James Marshall Hendrix 1942 - 1970
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2009, 08:38:49 PM »


Appreciate the help guys.

avoiding cell phones is NOT going to be an easy fix.
Especially in the jam packed, standing room only venues. I can turn mine off, but everyone around me? that's gonna be an issue..

 ;)
 
Live rig: DPA 4021 > V3 > iHP-120

Vinyl rig: Music hall 5.1 w/acrylic platter > Ortofon Quintet Black > Pro-Ject Tube-Box II > V3 > UA-5

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2009, 05:48:27 PM »
avoiding cell phones is NOT going to be an easy fix.
Especially in the jam packed, standing room only venues. I can turn mine off, but everyone around me? that's gonna be an issue..

Yeah, I know. Would wrapping the recorder in aluminum foil help?  ???
I read somewhere that it's not just the recorder that might be suceptible to interference. It can be taken up by the mic, or maybe even the cable?!
Some mics are supposedly better shielded than others. When AT upgraded the AT853's to U853, one selling point was better shielding compared to the old model. Maybe you could experiment with other mics? YMMV...
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2009, 05:57:16 PM »
I am going to bet it is the mics. 

A properly working V3 or H120 won't cause this.  Esspecially since the connection between the V3 and iRiver is electronically de-coupled via optical cable.   Those Nak's arn't modern and likely don't have the RF rejection needed for close proximity to cell phones. 

Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2009, 03:17:26 AM »
Esspecially since the connection between the V3 and iRiver is electronically de-coupled via optical cable.   Those Nak's arn't modern and likely don't have the RF rejection needed for close proximity to cell phones. 

Very good point, didn't think of that.
I wonder if the OP had the mics mounted up high on a stand?
How many feet away from the cellphone would you need to keep them to be safe?
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Big Muff

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Gender: Male
  • James Marshall Hendrix 1942 - 1970
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2009, 07:31:21 AM »


So if it could be the mics, is there a way to improve the shielding?
It's really weird that this only started happening back in Sept. I've owned these mics since the fall of '07.
It's like my rig just caught a cold..
 
The mic cables are belden 1804a. Whole Lineage: 700's > Audio Technica 8533 power modules > shorty "LeeGeddy/Bumblebee" interconnects > V3

cheers!
Live rig: DPA 4021 > V3 > iHP-120

Vinyl rig: Music hall 5.1 w/acrylic platter > Ortofon Quintet Black > Pro-Ject Tube-Box II > V3 > UA-5

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2009, 10:46:00 AM »
So if it could be the mics, is there a way to improve the shielding?

Hmm, a question for the Nak team, perhaps!? There are some serious hardware hacking going on there, maybe they can chime in?

How did you mount the mics when you got the interference?
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Big Muff

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Gender: Male
  • James Marshall Hendrix 1942 - 1970
Re: digi-noise
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2009, 11:57:42 AM »


Thanks, I looked into team Nak.

The mics have always been mounted DIN in a pvc bar..  http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,83851.0.html

perhaps the move to nyc has something to do with it?  lots more iphones/blackberries texting about around here
Live rig: DPA 4021 > V3 > iHP-120

Vinyl rig: Music hall 5.1 w/acrylic platter > Ortofon Quintet Black > Pro-Ject Tube-Box II > V3 > UA-5

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF