Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?  (Read 5064 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tony B

  • Needs more sun.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1375
  • Gender: Male
  • My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.
MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« on: October 02, 2007, 07:03:16 PM »
I've totally entered waffling-mode, and have no idea what I'm doing anymore.

I don't even know what good music sounds like.

If you're willing, link me with the above lineage(s), so I can shake the sand out of my vagina and do something.

That, or hook me up with some good music. My JB3 deaths have me a bit out of sorts......


Coffee is for Closers

MG m200>AM Hyperconducters>V3>JayBeeThree/h120

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2007, 07:31:44 PM »
Nothing shakes sand out of bagina's like MG 210......

buy this 900 cap for 250.....   

http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,91978.0.html




Yeah...I know..  - T for fluffing a sale in an unrelated thread.   But..... It is a nice sounding cap for dirt cheap.
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

Offline T.J.

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
  • Gender: Male
  • Always look on the Bright Side of Life
    • My shows taped on LMA
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2007, 07:34:30 PM »

Offline Tony B

  • Needs more sun.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1375
  • Gender: Male
  • My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2007, 08:54:40 PM »
looks like there is a bunch of MG>>>722 shows here:

http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=MG%20722%20AND%20mediatype%3Aetree%20AND%20collection%3Aetree

Thanks! I suppose that's what the archive is for.....

Re: the hyper cap, Lord knows I'd be down, my friend....but if that 250 could go toward a solid bit bucket, well, that's where my money will be sent; 'cause right now I'm running only Air, and the levels aren't all that cool.

Ts

tb
Coffee is for Closers

MG m200>AM Hyperconducters>V3>JayBeeThree/h120

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2007, 09:08:37 PM »
why are the choices between the m148 > V3 or the straight SD 7xx ??
why not run MG > V3?  that's a kick-ass combo :)
plenty of MG > V3 tapes here:
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=collection%3AClubdElf%20AND%20year%3A%222007%22

Offline Tony B

  • Needs more sun.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1375
  • Gender: Male
  • My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2007, 09:39:29 PM »
why are the choices between the m148 > V3 or the straight SD 7xx ??
why not run MG > V3?  that's a kick-ass combo :)
plenty of MG > V3 tapes here:
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=collection%3AClubdElf%20AND%20year%3A%222007%22

Well, that's what I've been doing, and I do dig it, but I've been thinking about going to the 24/48, if I'm going to get another recorder. And it seems like everyone and their mother is going the all-in-one route, so I wanted to see what it sounded like (it sounded as though Bean had a good experience with the MG>722 combo). On the flip side, I love my V3, and the MG>148>V3 fluffing has me a little kerfuffled.....

Thanks for the links though, brah!
Coffee is for Closers

MG m200>AM Hyperconducters>V3>JayBeeThree/h120

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2007, 09:45:19 PM »
Have you considered MG>M148>MME? You could grab a Mini Me and M148 for less than a 722, and IMHO the A/D converter in the MME is better than the V3. (Grace Design fans don't kill me, I prefer the V3's pre)


Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline Tony B

  • Needs more sun.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1375
  • Gender: Male
  • My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2007, 09:55:37 PM »
Have you considered MG>M148>MME? You could grab a Mini Me and M148 for less than a 722, and IMHO the A/D converter in the MME is better than the V3. (Grace Design fans don't kill me, I prefer the V3's pre)

Hmmm..never run a MME....what's the AD on it compared to the V3? I always liked the V3 for the fact that it was "clean," or "transparent" or whatever you want to call it. I'm not averse to coloration in the sound at this point...hell, I'm tabla rosa at this point.

« Last Edit: October 02, 2007, 09:57:58 PM by Tony B »
Coffee is for Closers

MG m200>AM Hyperconducters>V3>JayBeeThree/h120

Offline thegreatgumbino

  • Team Texas
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Taper
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2007, 10:35:54 PM »
What's your budget & what's your goal for capture, i.e. 16bit or 24bit? 

I ran M148 > V3 behind my JW Mod 460's for quite a while and loved the sound.  That being said, I don't miss hauling the brick around at all.  I slimmed the bag down considerably and am loving it.
It’s not what you look like when you’re doin’ what you’re doin’, it’s what your doin’ when you’re doin’ what you look like your doin’…express yourself. - Charles Wright

My recordings on the Archive

Offline terrapinj

  • Jonesin' for Tunes
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6553
  • Gender: Male
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2007, 10:39:45 PM »
i think that the A/D in the v3 and 722 are pretty similar

is money a significant issue here? mg>148>722 would be titties but more expensive.

also MG > psp2 combo is very nice since they are so rare you could go aerco mp2 route and have a pretty similar sound and save some ching on the m148

like gumbino said m148>v3>recorder is a lot of shit to haul around and more links in the chain that can go wrong IME.

do you have a recorder in mind aside from the 722?
JW mod AKG 460b (ck61/ck63 or mk46/ck1x/ck3x)>  EAA PSP-2 > 722

Segue Dogstar XLRs and Interconnects

ISO: (2) ck2x

Offline thegreatgumbino

  • Team Texas
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3346
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Taper
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2007, 10:45:12 PM »
is money a significant issue here? mg>148>722 would be titties but more expensive.

also MG > psp2 combo is very nice since they are so rare you could go aerco mp2 route and have a pretty similar sound and save some ching on the m148

like gumbino said m148>v3>recorder is a lot of shit to haul around and more links in the chain that can go wrong IME.

do you have a recorder in mind aside from the 722?

Well said, Mikey.  That's where I was going with my questions.
It’s not what you look like when you’re doin’ what you’re doin’, it’s what your doin’ when you’re doin’ what you look like your doin’…express yourself. - Charles Wright

My recordings on the Archive

Offline Tony B

  • Needs more sun.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1375
  • Gender: Male
  • My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2007, 11:26:55 PM »
Danka for the input gentlemen.

I don't really have a catch-all idea for a recorder, but 24 bit would be nice. Now, I could pick up a Microtrack and yes, that'd be cool, but for the money I put down on that, well.........I could upgrade, and that's where the rub really is, I guess.

Bottom line, if I'm going to get a new recorder, then I'd prefer 24/48. However, I'm wondering if my monies would be better funneled into a MG>148>V3>? combo or a straight up MG>7XX combo.

As I think I've made plain, I'm adrift here, and I'm not a rich man. Something has to give (i.e., if I go the 148 route, I need to sell a ton of shit to make it happen. Or, if I go the 722 route, I still need to sell a ton of shit to make it happen). Bottom line, I'm still 1K down from where I need to be, price-wise, and I know this. I'm just wondering what sounds better, or looking for options (Props to the 148>MME idea!)
Coffee is for Closers

MG m200>AM Hyperconducters>V3>JayBeeThree/h120

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2007, 06:44:53 AM »

I have a number of MG mv692/m94 > 722 and I could send you a few to listen to...

 ;)
hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline jlykos

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4416
  • Gender: Male
  • Don't sweat the technique
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2007, 06:02:49 AM »
Honestly, I'm not a fan of anything direct into the 722, but that's just my preference.  I think that the 722 has a world-class A/D with a so-so to bad preamp in it.  If you are looking for transparent, Gefell > V2 > 722 would probably be what you are looking for.  On the other end of the spectrum, Gefell > 148 > MiniMe would be extremely colored (more to my liking).  It is individual preference.  One problem is that not too many people run Gefells so finding comparison recordings with multiple gear configurations is difficult.  Good luck!
dpa 4061 > Church Audio 9200 > Sony PCM-D50 (Moon Audio Silver Dragon v3 interconnect)

"I have no views," Mickey Melchiondo, known as Dean Ween, said in a philosophical moment. "I am way too stupid. I have no strong feelings about anything. I'm really into television and the computer. I believe everything I see on TV and read on the Internet."

Offline grider

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4570
  • Gender: Male
  • always give more than you take
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2007, 11:11:55 AM »
Tony why not just keep the gear you have and buy a microtracker, they are going for less than 200 these days, problem solved and for cheap!

Offline L Ron Hoover

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2233
  • "I figure the odds be 50/50"
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2007, 03:34:48 PM »
Tony why not just keep the gear you have and buy a microtracker, they are going for less than 200 these days, problem solved and for cheap!


I agree. I run M300>V3>MT and am happy. I am planning to send the V3 in to Oade for the ACM mod one of these days though.

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2007, 04:34:15 PM »
I'm not sure I would run a "warm" pre behind the MGs unless you were running the hypers.
the MGs have a fat low-end as is.

when I ran the 200s, I tried the MP2, MiniMe, DMIC-20, V3 and straight into a DA-P1.
IMO, the MP2 over-accentuated the low end of the MGs as did the MiniMe. the DMIC added too much "presence" to them, ie, gave them a brittle high-end and a grainy low. the V3 was great to my ears. straight into the DA-P1 was my second fav of the group.

if I were to do everything over again:
24bit - 200s> V2> 722
16bit - 200s> V2> modSBM1//MiniMe> dat


the water's clean and innocent

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2007, 05:35:42 PM »
I would get the 702/722 and be DONE with it. If you come across some money, you could always add a v2 into the mix. If I were running Gefell's, Id be running MG>7xx or MG>V2/3>7xx :) As always, YMMV :)

And dont be scared of teh folks who dont like the 7xx's preamps ;) They most likely ahve never ran a 7xx unit and dont personally know for themselves :) The preamps in the 722 are my DEFINITE FAVORITE for the 480's and they aint too shabby for the MBHO's either ;D I know this doesnt really help your question, but I have ran 480>DMIC-20/Sonosax/V2/V3 and have heard just about every 480>pre/adc combo there humanly is possible and I MUCH prefer the 480>722 sound. The preamps are top-notch and sound PHENOM with a neutral mic IMO. I would bet you would be one happy tapir with the MG>722 sound :) If you arent, sell the MG's and get 480's and you'll be happy then ;D

I only ran MG200>722 for one set and MG210>722 for one set at moedown 2006(Thanks Jason!) but love the combo FWIW. In fact, I plan on having MG 200/210's in my mic arsenal within a year or so hopefully and guess what I'll be running them into? Thats right, a 722, that is until I can find/afford another V2 :)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: MG> M148>V3 vs. MG>7XX?
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2007, 07:13:58 PM »
I too plan on having MG 200s in my mic arsenal within a year or so, very likely in Spring 2008 - I LOVE the sound of the Gefells that I'm running straight into the 722 now and I'll vary that combo with a mytek 192 > Oade ACM mod V3 or Portico 5012 > 722 until I hear what I like...  I'll also try the same options with the MG 200s.

If you would like to coordinate with me sometime here in The Twin Cities we could run your Gefells: 

1) straight into my 722 -
2) with your V3 into my 722 -
3) with my Oade ACM mod V3 into my 722 -

I'd love to do an A/B with your MGs >  our V3s > 722.

 :)

« Last Edit: October 05, 2007, 07:16:32 PM by dactylus »
hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 44 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF