Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Microphones & Setup => Topic started by: HealthCov Chris on December 25, 2023, 02:52:13 AM
-
I notice folks don't seem to be jumping on these mics. Is there any particular reason? I am curious as I am considering a small form factor solid body mic. I have had the Neumann 184, and would like to find something else in that style. Considering the Microtech Gefell 300/310; DPA 2012/2015. I was hoping to hear more examples of the DPA's, but there just aren't many out there. At that price, what am I missing?
-
I would also like to hear more examples of the 2012 and 2015, but I haven't heard any samples with them used as a main pair for acoustic music.
Maybe repost this in Team DPA for more responses?
Gefell is coming out with a new 400 series as well:
https://www.sound-link.co.uk/gefell/small-diaphragm-condenser-microphones/m-400-series/
-
Mark Terry has been running a stereo pair of the DPA 2012 mics! If you check the DPA thread I believe he posted links to some Phish shows he recorded. Here is a Goose show.
https://archive.org/details/goose2023-09-23
-
I would also like to hear more examples of the 2012 and 2015, but I haven't heard any samples with them used as a main pair for acoustic music.
Maybe repost this in Team DPA for more responses?
Gefell is coming out with a new 400 series as well:
https://www.sound-link.co.uk/gefell/small-diaphragm-condenser-microphones/m-400-series/
Wow, I had no idea. I really like the MG M200 series so these are up my alley. Just hope they aren’t priced like the Shoeps.
-
I would also like to hear more examples of the 2012 and 2015, but I haven't heard any samples with them used as a main pair for acoustic music.
Maybe repost this in Team DPA for more responses?
Gefell is coming out with a new 400 series as well:
https://www.sound-link.co.uk/gefell/small-diaphragm-condenser-microphones/m-400-series/
Wow, I had no idea. I really like the MG M200 series so these are up my alley. Just hope they aren’t priced like the Shoeps.
There's been some discussion about them on Team Microtech Gefell, but no word yet on pricing. They clearly look like a response to the Schoeps CMC 1.
-
Which clearly look like a response to the MMP-C...
Honestly, I think these mics are still new enough that you can't expect too many samples as of yet. A lot of people are hesitant to be an early adopter. The reviews will start trickling in as more people give them a shot (and as DPA loans out a bunch to good customers to try); that's pretty much what happened when they first introduced the modular line-up.
-
Which clearly look like a response to the MMP-C...
Honestly, I think these mics are still new enough that you can't expect too many samples as of yet. A lot of people are hesitant to be an early adopter. The reviews will start trickling in as more people give them a shot (and as DPA loans out a bunch to good customers to try); that's pretty much what happened when they first introduced the modular line-up.
Right, and the people who record the stuff I do aren't likely to try these mics as mains because they already own the 4000 series, Schoeps, Senn MKH, etc. and assume (perhaps correctly) that these new "stage" DPAs won't be quite as good so they won't bother trying them. Although many of these same people own Line Audio mics which are WAY cheaper...
-
Last year I have been searching for a complementary pair to my DPA 4090 mics and I had both a set of DPA 2012 and a set DPA 2015 home for a few weeks to try. Kindly arranged with the Belgium/Dutch DPA importer (Amptec).
I did some pipe organ recordings with 2x2012 + 2x2015 + 2x4090 all into my F6.
The sound signature of the 2012 and 2015 was very similar, also similar to the 4090. Both 2012 and 2015 are clearly designed for close recording; they work best at a distance where my 4090 still does a good job so for me they were not complementary, rather alternative options.
Compared with some other microphones I tried (KM184, KM140, KM143) they have notable more bass. I found that remarkable for directional microphones.
The DPA 4090 is however still more neutral than both the 2012 and 2015.
Compared with the DPA2015 the KM143 is much brighter and needs to be used quite far from the organ to sound balanced. It has also less bass. For a standalone microphone I would have selected the DPA2015. However, for use together with my DPA4090 (4 mics on one bar), the KM143 is a better addition (for application in huge acoustics or when the organ is too high for my stand).
I had a chance to exchange a pair brand-new pair of KM184 against a pair of KM143. That was what I finally did. I hope this was a good deal.
The KM143's were just used for voice amplification purposes, so they have got a better life now :D.
-
Last year I have been searching for a complementary pair to my DPA 4090 mics and I had both a set of DPA 2012 and a set DPA 2015 home for a few weeks to try. Kindly arranged with the Belgium/Dutch DPA importer (Amptec).
I did some pipe organ recordings with 2x2012 + 2x2015 + 2x4090 all into my F6.
The sound signature of the 2012 and 2015 was very similar, also similar to the 4090. Both 2012 and 2015 are clearly designed for close recording; they work best at a distance where my 4090 still does a good job so for me they were not complementary, rather alternative options.
Compared with some other microphones I tried (KM184, KM140, KM143) they have notable more bass. I found that remarkable for directional microphones.
The DPA 4090 is however still more neutral than both the 2012 and 2015.
Compared with the DPA2015 the KM143 is much brighter and needs to be used quite far from the organ to sound balanced. It has also less bass. For a standalone microphone I would have selected the DPA2015. However, for use together with my DPA4090 (4 mics on one bar), the KM143 is a better addition (for application in huge acoustics or when the organ is too high for my stand).
I had a chance to exchange a pair brand-new pair of KM184 against a pair of KM143. That was what I finally did. I hope this was a good deal.
The KM143's were just used for voice amplification purposes, so they have got a better life now :D.
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
-
Hello Chris, in the pipe organ recording world close distance is ~5 meters while far is ~11 meters. I do not know how that translate to tapering of amplified shows.
If you send me a PM I may send you the complete 6 channel F6 recording file (32 bit, 44,1 kHz) via WeTransfer.
The DPA4090 stereo track can be used as reference to judge and compare the DPA2012 and DPA2015 tracks.
I used several stops when playing the pipe organ; certain stops like Cornet and Trumpet reveal the differences between the mikes more than the round sounding flutes.
-
At that price, what am I missing?
I run them. What do you want to know.
-
Last year I have been searching for a complementary pair to my DPA 4090 mics and I had both a set of DPA 2012 and a set DPA 2015 home for a few weeks to try. Kindly arranged with the Belgium/Dutch DPA importer (Amptec).
I did some pipe organ recordings with 2x2012 + 2x2015 + 2x4090 all into my F6.
The sound signature of the 2012 and 2015 was very similar, also similar to the 4090. Both 2012 and 2015 are clearly designed for close recording; they work best at a distance where my 4090 still does a good job so for me they were not complementary, rather alternative options.
Compared with some other microphones I tried (KM184, KM140, KM143) they have notable more bass. I found that remarkable for directional microphones.
The DPA 4090 is however still more neutral than both the 2012 and 2015.
Compared with the DPA2015 the KM143 is much brighter and needs to be used quite far from the organ to sound balanced. It has also less bass. For a standalone microphone I would have selected the DPA2015. However, for use together with my DPA4090 (4 mics on one bar), the KM143 is a better addition (for application in huge acoustics or when the organ is too high for my stand).
I had a chance to exchange a pair brand-new pair of KM184 against a pair of KM143. That was what I finally did. I hope this was a good deal.
The KM143's were just used for voice amplification purposes, so they have got a better life now :D.
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
https://archive.org/details/sci2023-07-30/sci2023-07-30_set1t06.flac
This was 160' back from the stage (where they had me set up at soundbaord). ORTF @ 7'
I'd say they handled just peachy at a distance.
-
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
https://archive.org/details/sci2023-07-30/sci2023-07-30_set1t06.flac
This was 160' back from the stage (where they had me set up at soundbaord). ORTF @ 7'
I'd say they handled just peachy at a distance.
The review of the show is interesting and germaine to this discussion
-
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
https://archive.org/details/sci2023-07-30/sci2023-07-30_set1t06.flac
This was 160' back from the stage (where they had me set up at soundbaord). ORTF @ 7'
I'd say they handled just peachy at a distance.
The review of the show is interesting and germaine to this discussion
HA!!!! Just saw it was the thread starter. Well how 'bout them apples. :banging head: :banging head: :banging head: :banging head:
-
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
https://archive.org/details/sci2023-07-30/sci2023-07-30_set1t06.flac
This was 160' back from the stage (where they had me set up at soundbaord). ORTF @ 7'
I'd say they handled just peachy at a distance.
The review of the show is interesting and germaine to this discussion
HA!!!! Just saw it was the thread starter. Well how 'bout them apples. :banging head: :banging head: :banging head: :banging head:
Yes, I really like that SCI show. Just hoping for more variety before making a commitment. Plus, you had them running through a MiniMe, which likely adds some flavor. Just like the 2015's, only used in the same small venues in Nebraska. I guess they have not caught on in our community much yet. Coming from nbob active setups, I really like the small form factor of these DPA mics, along with their price (vs. the top line mics).
-
So, sounds like you feel they may not be ideal for our purposes of field recording at a distance from the stage?
https://archive.org/details/sci2023-07-30/sci2023-07-30_set1t06.flac
This was 160' back from the stage (where they had me set up at soundbaord). ORTF @ 7'
I'd say they handled just peachy at a distance.
The review of the show is interesting and germaine to this discussion
HA!!!! Just saw it was the thread starter. Well how 'bout them apples. :banging head: :banging head: :banging head: :banging head:
Yes, I really like that SCI show. Just hoping for more variety before making a commitment. Plus, you had them running through a MiniMe, which likely adds some flavor. Just like the 2015's, only used in the same small venues in Nebraska. I guess they have not caught on in our community much yet. Coming from nbob active setups, I really like the small form factor of these DPA mics, along with their price (vs. the top line mics).
I’ll work on doing some stuff into the dr100, sans mini-me!
-
a better preamp won’t make a microphone better in a situation that isn’t right for it. I think you’re just over thinking things. Most people haven’t adopted the 201xs because most people don’t want to invest $2000 in microphones they haven’t heard used, just like you. You lose out on the ability to run active cables and different caps, but get a good reliable microphone for situations you can run on a stand.
-
You lose out on the ability to run active cables and different caps, but get a good reliable microphone for situations you can run on a stand.
This is about it. I didn’t want to track down actives at the same price (because that’s just a weird price range), I love the DPA sound, and to get the mics for $1700 out the door brand new seemed like a great option (and interest free with sweet water). I can run them FOB just fine, and they are very small. durable. and to me, work great with my
mini me.
ill never stealth anything, so that ruled out a lot. took a risk on them. but its not like DPA would put out some hot garbage.
-
.
marking thread for that minime prelove
use 24/48 and the soft knee and never look back, man :coolguy: :headphones:
-
Just picked up a set of 2015's for when I need a more low profile rig and don't want to run my AKG LD's and the ability to run an 8-ch rig with my MP10 as well, very excited! I find i love the bass & room reproduction of wide cardioid's and run them at every show I go to whether its indoors or outdoors.
I'll have a chance to run these this weekend for a number of bands at a local Atlanta jam band festival. I'll make sure to report back to this thread on what I think of these compared to the AKG C414's.
-
Just picked up a set of 2015's for when I need a more low profile rig and don't want to run my AKG LD's and the ability to run an 8-ch rig with my MP10 as well, very excited! I find i love the bass & room reproduction of wide cardioid's and run them at every show I go to whether its indoors or outdoors.
I'll have a chance to run these this weekend for a number of bands at a local Atlanta jam band festival. I'll make sure to report back to this thread on what I think of these compared to the AKG C414's.
Good score!
I had some DPA 2012 mounts made on shapeways, so you should have the pick of ORTF/DIN/DINa/NOS....stoked to hear some more tapes (so it's not just me!)
-
I was able to pick up some rycote shockmounts that just barely fit the 2015's, but I'll check out the shapeways as well. I've had the chance to record 3 Biscuits shows so far with them and have been blown away by how great they sound. I'm considering replacing my KM184's with the 2012's. Need some more time under my belt with the 2015's thought to really solidify that though in some different venue environments that I regularly tape at.
-
DPA makes killer mics! I've been really happy with my 4011 and 4018 caps.
I was able to pick up some rycote shockmounts that just barely fit the 2015's, but I'll check out the shapeways as well. I've had the chance to record 3 Biscuits shows so far with them and have been blown away by how great they sound. I'm considering replacing my KM184's with the 2012's. Need some more time under my belt with the 2015's thought to really solidify that though in some different venue environments that I regularly tape at.
-
I was able to pick up some rycote shockmounts that just barely fit the 2015's, but I'll check out the shapeways as well.
this has been working for me. Just need to add a lil sticky inside the shock mount holder portion so the mount doesn't slip.
-
Just picked up a set of 2015's for when I need a more low profile rig and don't want to run my AKG LD's and the ability to run an 8-ch rig with my MP10 as well, very excited! I find i love the bass & room reproduction of wide cardioid's and run them at every show I go to whether its indoors or outdoors.
I'll have a chance to run these this weekend for a number of bands at a local Atlanta jam band festival. I'll make sure to report back to this thread on what I think of these compared to the AKG C414's.
How did it go? Looking forward to hearing your recordings with the 2015's.
-
Just picked up a set of 2015's for when I need a more low profile rig and don't want to run my AKG LD's and the ability to run an 8-ch rig with my MP10 as well, very excited! I find i love the bass & room reproduction of wide cardioid's and run them at every show I go to whether its indoors or outdoors.
I'll have a chance to run these this weekend for a number of bands at a local Atlanta jam band festival. I'll make sure to report back to this thread on what I think of these compared to the AKG C414's.
How did it go? Looking forward to hearing your recordings with the 2015's.
I've been getting back into some PC gaming lately so my Biscuits recordings have suffered, lol, but I should have at least the Asheville show up by Sunday night and the rest end of next week. I'm honestly very impressed with the 2015's so far, very balanced mic with some really nice detail on the bottom end. They've got me jonesing a little bit to try out the 2012's.
-
I’d be down to swap my 2012s and run the 2015s for FOB for phish in St. Louis.
-
I’d be down to swap my 2012s and run the 2015s for FOB for phish in St. Louis.
Remind me at the beginning of July, I'll need to see what I have scheduled for late July / early August to see when I could actually run the 2012's, but I'd be down to trade for a bit (if i haven't already bought the 2012's ;-) ).