Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Oddball microphone techniques - part 1  (Read 166287 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #225 on: August 16, 2017, 04:55:46 PM »
Just came across this and there are a few arrays I've never seen.  The surround-specific setups are probably familiar to many here, but In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

http://www.sanken-mic.com/en/qanda/index.cfm/18.56?

Great link.  I may try a bastardized version of Omni+8 this weekend.  (Bastardized because I don't have the means to get the figure 8 40 cm in front of the omnis...I may be able to get close to that, though.)

I think the OCT also looks pretty cool.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline voltronic

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4104
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #226 on: August 16, 2017, 08:52:56 PM »
Just came across this and there are a few arrays I've never seen.  The surround-specific setups are probably familiar to many here, but In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

http://www.sanken-mic.com/en/qanda/index.cfm/18.56?

Great link.  I may try a bastardized version of Omni+8 this weekend.  (Bastardized because I don't have the means to get the figure 8 40 cm in front of the omnis...I may be able to get close to that, though.)

I wonder how the 40cm forward placement for the fig8 works without causing phase issues.  Lots of wavelengths in the audible range there.  It's not like a Decca Tree where the distance from the mid mic back to the flankers is relatively large.
I am hitting my head against the walls, but the walls are giving way.
- Gustav Mahler

Acoustic Recording Techniques
Team Classical
Team Line Audio
Team DPA

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8281
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #227 on: August 17, 2017, 11:52:39 AM »
Just came across this and there are a few arrays I've never seen.  The surround-specific setups are probably familiar to many here, but In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

http://www.sanken-mic.com/en/qanda/index.cfm/18.56?

Great link.  I may try a bastardized version of Omni+8 this weekend.  (Bastardized because I don't have the means to get the figure 8 40 cm in front of the omnis...I may be able to get close to that, though.)

I wonder how the 40cm forward placement for the fig8 works without causing phase issues.  Lots of wavelengths in the audible range there.  It's not like a Decca Tree where the distance from the mid mic back to the flankers is relatively large.
I've been holding off typing in this thread because We've donbe about 20 sets with various OMT's this summer and I was hoping to start a discussion about mixing these sources. (Have spoken with Gut about this who of course welcomes the input).
HOWEVER, looking at that Omni + 8 I can say you would not have to goo out 40cm, you could just line it up horizontally with the Omni's. Remember the article is for "surround sound" techniques; while using OMT's could be of use when creating surround sound, we are not doing that typically and my experience with Omni plus supercard middle, Omni plus card middle, Omni plus Hyper pair X-Y in the middle tells me you should try this Omni + 8  as I describe, in line with each other.
And THANKS to Volt for posting that link, it is very useful.
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #228 on: August 17, 2017, 12:03:53 PM »
HOWEVER, looking at that Omni + 8 I can say you would not have to goo out 40cm, you could just line it up horizontally with the Omni's.

That's encouraging to hear because I tried setting it up last night and I can only get my figure 8 about 21 cm in front of the omnis.

I guess the follow-up question is whether, for pure stereo purposes, it would be better to have the figure 8 mic 21 cm in front of the omnis or closer to in line with them?  I don't think I can get them exactly in line, but I can get them pretty close.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8281
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #229 on: August 17, 2017, 12:14:48 PM »
^^^^^^ doesn't have to be exact.As long as the difference is no more than 20cm it will not be audible. we've been running the ck8 or cards about 10-12 cm in front and there is no problem with phase alignment in post.
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline thatjackelliott

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #230 on: August 17, 2017, 12:56:15 PM »
For that OCT layout . . . what does "omni directional" mean?

Also, on the left side we have two mics with complementary 100Hz high and low pass filters being summed. No such setup on the right side, just the "omni directional" mic. The asymmetry puzzles me. Perhaps that arrangement on the left side creates a single "omni directional" mic and we see it simplified on the right. It baffles science.

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #231 on: August 17, 2017, 01:02:44 PM »
For that OCT layout . . . what does "omni directional" mean?

Also, on the left side we have two mics with complementary 100Hz high and low pass filters being summed. No such setup on the right side, just the "omni directional" mic. The asymmetry puzzles me. Perhaps that arrangement on the left side creates a single "omni directional" mic and we see it simplified on the right. It baffles science.
I assumed they intended the same arrangement on the right side, but didn't duplicate it just to save space.  That's just my assumption though.

Edit: Here is some info on OCT from Schoeps that doesn't include the omnis (interesting that it also provides different recording angles depending on the spacing of the supercards) http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/oct-set
« Last Edit: August 17, 2017, 01:18:58 PM by heathen »
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8281
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #232 on: August 17, 2017, 01:15:21 PM »
For that OCT layout . . . what does "omni directional" mean?

Also, on the left side we have two mics with complementary 100Hz high and low pass filters being summed. No such setup on the right side, just the "omni directional" mic. The asymmetry puzzles me. Perhaps that arrangement on the left side creates a single "omni directional" mic and we see it simplified on the right. It baffles science.
I assumed they intended the same arrangement on the right side, but didn't duplicate it just to save space.  That's just my assumption though.
seconded, because if not, then thatjackelliot sure does have a point! (according to the physics I learned)
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline jbosco

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Gender: Male
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #233 on: August 17, 2017, 01:24:08 PM »
Just came across this and there are a few arrays I've never seen.  The surround-specific setups are probably familiar to many here, but In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

http://www.sanken-mic.com/en/qanda/index.cfm/18.56?

The Double MS looks interesting, I assume the three mics would be coincident, would the body of the reverse facing cardioid interfere with the front facing one in anyway (reflections, baffling, etc)? I guess you would just use the front facing M as a center channel in a 5.1 scenerio?
---
Neumann KM 184 -> Tascam DR 70D
DPA 4061 -> Sony M10

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #234 on: August 17, 2017, 01:30:21 PM »
Here's some Schoeps double m/s setups: http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/categories/doublems
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8281
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #235 on: August 17, 2017, 01:54:05 PM »
gutbucket and I have discussed DBL MS. we have run M/S with a ck8 middle, but never a DBL MS. I am betting for certain applications (Orchestral, ambient, surround recording) with certain mics  it rocks.
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #236 on: August 20, 2017, 03:48:34 PM »
For logistical reasons I wasn't able to try the omni+8 configuration as it's specified in that Sanken link this weekend.  I was only able to get the omnis spread about 20 inches, and the figure 8 was only a couple inches in front of the omnis (there's a picture in the Rig Pictures subforum). 

Anyway, here's a sample: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1n0IflrIOocMEJiUlhEb3RVYUE

(I suspect, but am not sure, that the battery in my battery box lost some juice part of the way through this song.  Maybe I'm crazy, but it seems like the bass drops out a bit around halfway through.  I could just be imagining things though.)
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15698
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #237 on: August 25, 2017, 04:02:11 PM »
Glad to see such a flurry of activity in this thread upon my return (out since last week an eclipse trip to Idaho, just back on-line today), and find it somewhat ironic that this thread was relatively quiet until just last week.  I've input on a lot of the posts above and will try to address each over the next few days as I catch up.  Cheers to all, and look forward to the discussion..
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15698
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #238 on: August 25, 2017, 04:42:01 PM »
Just came across this and there are a few arrays I've never seen.  The surround-specific setups are probably familiar to many here, but In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

http://www.sanken-mic.com/en/qanda/index.cfm/18.56?

Thanks for that link Volt.  Those are all relatively well known and documented "purist" location surround mic'ing techniques.  I'll post a link to some free AES papers assessing and comparing these techniques once I can locate them again for those interested in more specifics about them.

Much of what into the development of the oddball arrays I've been playing with over the years is informed by these techniques.   I've found some basic core relationships that apply broadly to all these arrays, and based on that I've combined elements from many of these techniques in ways which better apply to the specifics of the recording situations I find myself in.  The key is understanding those basic relationships, testing things to confirm the understanding is accurate, and then furthering a more nuanced understanding of specifics.  One very useful array not mentioned in the Sanken page which I've found useful in concept and practice is David Gresinger's (acoustics expert, sound engineer, former Lexicon head scientist) array of 5 spaced omnis (or forward pointing directional microphones) in a line across the front of the stage - somewhat unique in that all mics are arranged in a single line, which has unique technical merits as well as being practical in terms of setup. More about that later and how it can be combined with these other techniques.


As a general statement I will say this-  These arrays are all primarily intended for 3, 4 or 5-channel stereo playback rather than 2-channel stereo playback.  Some "fold down" (mix) to 2-channel stereo better than others.  We can get in to why that is, and how to develop a understanding for when they will and when they won't.  Yet in general, I've been extremely encouraged regarding how well these techniques or variants on them work when mixing down to 2-channel in comparison to simple dedicated 2-microphone arrays.  When chosen wisely, there is typically far more advantage than conflict with regards to 2-channel playback, and when there is a problem it's typically easily mitigated by having total control over the mix.  Techniques which work especially well for surround recording are usually advantageous for 2-channel stereo as well in my experience.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2017, 12:27:30 PM by Gutbucket »
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15698
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Oddball microphone techniques
« Reply #239 on: August 25, 2017, 06:01:45 PM »
In terms of "oddball" for non-surround recording, I'd really like to try out the Omni+8 setup.

That setup has interested me and in other threads at TS I've suggested tapers give it a try in certain situations.  It's a variation on spaced omnis + center mic, which is the starting point of most of my oddball techniques.

I think it's applicable to TS partly because it is relatively simple, using just 3 channels.  In terms of 2-channel stereo, I see it as a variant on the classic Decca tree 3-omni triangle approach.  The advantage I see in using a bidirectional center mic rather than some other pattern is maximally increased forward directivity of pickup in the center (an ever-increasing incremental change moving from center-omni > center-cardioid >  center-supercard > center-bidirectional).  In some ways it's similar to using a shotgun mic in the center in that sense.

Several basic aspects in play here:
1) A bi-directional achieves the most-narrow angle of forward sensitivity achievable in the center mic (other than a multi-capsule DSP shotgun like the Schoeps CMIT), along with a very smooth and well behaved polar pattern.  A typical shotgun may be similarly forward directional, or perhaps even more so at high frequencies, but it's polar-pattern varies far more with frequency and is typically quite ragged.  Combination with the omnis covers that raggedness to a significant extent in contrast to a shotgun or pair of them alone, but it helps if all three mics share the same timbre for best tonal blend and image stability.  A bi-directional is more likely to be of the same timbre as the omnis (above several hundred Hz) than a shotgun and blend more smoothly in a mix.

2) As a great practical setup advantage, the increased degree of forward directivity allows for a less wide L/R omni spacing without introducing to much inter-channel crosstalk which would otherwise compromise image width and make things overly monophonic.  Remember, if you are using any kind of center mic at all, you'll want the R/L mics spaced wider (or angled further apart, or both) than you would if using just the two microphones alone. If I'm using 3 omnis instead of 2, I generally want to double the L/R spacing. A more directional center mic allows for somewhat less wide L/R spacing.  A bi-directional or shotgun center is the logical conclusion of that trend, allowing for a more reasonable spacing of the omni pair, more easily achievable on a single mic stand.

3) The bi-directional pattern has the least sensitivity to the immediate surroundings beneath the microphone in the immediate vicinity around the mic stand.  It does have equal sensitivity to the front and rear, but if up say 9 or 10' on the stand, the most proximate audience nearby (and thus the loudest by proximity) is in or near that null.

4) I like arrays which include a rear facing microphone (when recording four or more channels).  Just a bit of that rear facing channel mixed in makes the recorded ambience sound far more natural to me.  Obviously how much can be used depends on the sound of the venue and the behavior of the audience behind the recording position, but Rocksuitcase has confirmed to me the value of a rear facing mic in his experiments as a well.  A center mic pattern with some "rear lobe" achieves that without a 4th microphone, if in a less controlled way.  In a good room with a good audience, a bidirectional center could provide a perfect balance in that regard.  Consider that the omni + 8 is equally sensitive to the front and rear.  In that aspect if not others it is similar to Blumlein or a pair of spaced omnis.  Yet it will have more front/back reach than a pair of omnis or Blumlein with less sensitivity to the sides, above, and below.   In most cases I expect using a hyper-card or supercard in the center will be preferable, providing greater forward sensitivity bias with with less sensitivity to the rear, but still enough to help with this ambient naturalness in comparison to a center shotgun.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.109 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF