Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Where to buy my 702??? (Formerly: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702)  (Read 4820 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
Where to buy my 702??? (Formerly: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702)
« on: March 20, 2008, 05:34:23 PM »
EDIT:

Ok so I am about ready to pull the trigger, and I wanted to ask peoples opinions of where I should buy it. 

Is there a particular online retailer that people prefer to purchase the 7 series from?  What are some of your experiences?  Does anyone give any extra incentive to buy from them?

I also have 2 local retailers that will sell it to me for the same price as online.

What do you all think?


***************************************ORIGINAL POST BELOW**********************************************

Hey Folks,

It looks like my AKGs are gonna sell, so I am about ready to make the move to the SoundDevices 7xx.  I would like peoples opinions on which way to go.  I will never use the full 40Gigs of harddrive with the 722, and I have heard that the 702 burns way less battery power.  I have about 24Gigs of Flash memory right now, and it is very cheap to get more.

Are there any issues with the 702 with certain flash cards? (To my knowledge all other CF recorders have issues with certain cards)

The only real benefit I see the 722 is the fact that you can record to the harddrive and back that up with flash, if I am correct.  Another factor is that I would be buying the 722 used, or the 702 new.

Please share opinions, thoughts, and such.

Thanks,
Joe
« Last Edit: March 24, 2008, 12:20:04 PM by Bdifr78 »
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

Offline dennisrtyler

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4831
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2008, 05:42:07 PM »
buy a new 702 and with the money saved by 2 16g cards and be happy.
4. im so abrasive i make sandpaper nervous.

Schoeps CMR/mk4 > Naiant PFA > Oade Concert Mod Marantz PMD-661

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2008, 06:00:26 PM »
This chart suggests the power consumption is the same with flash and hard drive:

http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/recorders/powering/power-draw

Offline johnw

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3818
  • Gender: Male
    • My cd List
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2008, 07:40:10 PM »
Yeah I don't get super long runtimes on my batteries or anything. Around 5.5 on 6600mAh with phantom on, stealth mode. That said, I would buy a 702 again even if I could afford the 722. If you want to back up recordings, you can connect a CF reader by firewire and record to 2 cards at once.
Schoeps MK41 & MK4V  |  Schoeps CMC6, Schoeps KCY, AKI/2C, PFA, Nbox Cable/PFA  |  Grace V2, Nbox Platinum  |  SD744T, SD MixPre 6, Sony PCM M10

Canon 16-35mm/2.8L mkii, 24-70mm/2.8L, 70-200mm/2.8L IS, 50mm/1.8 mkii, 135mm/2L, 100mm/2.8L IS, Sigma 35mm/1.4 A  |  Canon 5D mk4

Offline aberg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
  • Team Canada
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2008, 10:27:54 PM »
702 for sure... no moving parts = warm fuzzy...

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2008, 11:13:31 PM »
This chart suggests the power consumption is the same with flash and hard drive:

http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/recorders/powering/power-draw


Right but the unit in the test is a 744T and from what I have heard the 744 and 722's spin up the hard drive regardless if you are recording to the Hard drive or not.  I would guess this is why the power consumption is so similar.

« Last Edit: March 20, 2008, 11:15:20 PM by campbrs »
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2008, 06:39:22 AM »
I just had the same exact decision about a month ago & went with the 702. Best taping purchase I have ever made, I can't believe how nicely made these things are! Plus I picked up a 32gb CF card for $140, no problems running the card at all.
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2008, 07:14:17 AM »
either way, a sound investment.  money wont be lost.

Offline aegert

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2008, 09:28:44 AM »
I love the 722 nice to have the hd and the card for back up.. and when stealth  put a dummy card in the cf slot and if popped handum' the card ;-) Show on drive!


A :D
B&k 4022's > Grace Lunatec V3 > Self Built  Neutrik/ Mogami XLR to TRS > Korg MR1000

Schoeps CMT44's > Self Built Neutrik/ Tuchel 2 ch Snake > Switchcraft Phantom to T-power Adapters > Grace Lunatec V3 > Sound Devices 722

www.motb.org

The bus came by and I got on....

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2008, 10:04:54 AM »
A static shock won't kill the 7xx hard drive but cards are susceptible.  I haven't heard of a single failure of either with the 7xx.

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2008, 10:39:13 AM »
Alright so dumb question I guess but I'll ask anyway.  How much are the batteries for these guys, and are there other options out there?
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2008, 11:07:59 AM »
Alright so dumb question I guess but I'll ask anyway.  How much are the batteries for these guys, and are there other options out there?

Ok so yes I am a douche bag, I have found plenty of threads with the information I need. 

Could this 1800emart battery really be ok to use?  It's half the price of the other options.  That worries me.
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

Offline midside

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 404
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2008, 01:25:19 PM »
Over the years, I have had failed hard drives and corrupted flash cards, so, I like redundant file storage.
At the same time, I like the low-heat, low power dissipation of recording on a flash card.
I also like to be able to go on a long trip (without my laptop) and have plenty of storage space.
Therefore, I have upgraded my internal drive to 160gb and I have a 160gb external:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822186049
I record on the flash card, then copy the files to both the internal and external drives.
Works for me.....
(p.s. I frequently record 4 tracks of 24/96 on a 744)

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2008, 07:10:54 PM »
I prefer the 722 because with an 80G HD it will hold an entire festival without me having to bring anything else to "dump" the cards to.   Same goes for tour.  At some point I'll install a solid state drive to replace the current rotating drive - that will eliminate any possibility of mechanical failure.

Also I'm getting old and lazy so I tend to like fewer things I have to keep track of.   You can pop a card in the 702 before you leave the house for one show, but for a weekend you need to remember to bring a few of them.   To me the internal drive is insurance against forgetting media or having to swap media.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline mmedley.

  • is on a salty highway burning up a lucky streak
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6077
  • Gender: Male
  • CAR RAMROD
Re: Where to buy my 702??? (Formerly: Sound Devices 722 vs. 702)
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2008, 12:26:36 AM »
Well, I would've recommended Cascade if they were still in biz, but I think your best bet might be Trew Audio in Nashville. If you can get it locally and not pay sales tax, then all the better.  :)
I don't know just where I'm going
But I'm gonna try for the kingdom, if I can

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF