Most of the mics in that tree have a clear shot. That one stereo mic in the back is probably effected,
http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=536292
Listen for yourself....
My apologies, sir, if I caused offense. I didn't mean to. That's the hard thing about text on a forum, it doesn't come with body language.
I was speculating that if you could run an A-B test with that tree, versus removing all the other mics on the tree, it's seems probable that there would be SOME difference, measurable in some small way, and that's all I meant. A spectrum analyzer might show it down 1db at 20khz, but I know I couldn't hear that. So that might be called "effected", but that doesn't mean it's bad or significant to most people. As someone else noted, "effected" and "sounds like shit" are two vastly different things.
Since several people have chimed it to say it's an excellent recording, it seems clear that if it was effected, it wasn't by enough to matter, and that is probably the best answer for the original post.
In regards to my statement about the Stone Church beam, I have seen at least one case where it was a noticeable difference. I don't remember what show it was, or what mics I was using, I just remember that there was an instance where one channel was slightly muffled, to the point where I was displeased and didn't seed it.