Not to pile on raymonda, but all you have to do is listen to the recording. It sounds like crap. It is unacceptable by any standard. In that regard, discussing the subject in terms of Hertz is not very meaningful.
I'm not sure how you are piling on. I agree that there were problems. I agreed from the onset and stated why I thought there was a major problem. However, we disagree as to what the primary problem is. Not that the other problems are not significant but rather predictable when considering it was recorded outside and far field, i.e., ambient (Omni), first row, head level.
Also, some of the wind actually increases the low end frequency by 30-40 dbs from 175-11hz, not just 15-20. Are folks really arguing that this is not a problem that would have a significant impact on the frequency plot and sound of the recording? Not to mention the challenge the electronics and speaker would have replicating this noise.
To me this so obvious that I find it amazing that others don't agree or at least acknowledge there is a problem and that my statement is correct.
My final comment, albeit, "stupid and ignorant" is, harmonics are not reinforced in open air as they are in a reverberant environment. A reverberant environment will/can cause peak and nodes depending on the demensions and reflectivity, or lack or reflectivity of the room. Thus, in open air, at a distance, you will not get the same frequency plot that you will get indoor. You usually get more fundimentals than harmonics.
Yeh, I'm sure I sound like I saying the world is flat but hey, I'm ignorant and my 30 years of recording and 40 years playing has taught me nothing but to be ignorant.