Anyone? Thoughts?
I'll bite
First off, I think the levels were a BIT OFF. Yours seemed a TAD HIGHER in output levels, but overall, they were pretty even I guess.
Schoeps recording - Obviously a little bit "darker" than your recording, and overall VERY NICE. Great lowend response, clear and pristine vocals, not alot of chatter at all, and super smooth highs. Overall an A+ recording IMO1
Soundfiled/MBHO recording - Well, The Highs are CRISP AS HELL and are as SMOOTH AS BUTTA, the mids are just as consistent, and the lowend is very steady and consistent without being "dark" or "muddy" at all. What REALLY CAPTURES ME and why I like YOUR RECORDING BETTER, is DEFINITELY the presence and the overall HUGE DIFFERENCE in soundstage and 3D imaging
HANDS DOWN the winner of the 2 sources IMO, and an EASY A++ recording
I would CREAM MY FUCKING PANTS if I had that particular mic and pulled consistent recordings liek this all of the time
I just LOVE the 3D IMAGING/SOUNDSTAGE and the overall HUGE PRESENCE in your MS recording over the "darker" and "muddier" Schoeps recording IMO.
LOVE IT JTL. Keep those samples/recordings COMING MY MAN
I am TRULY FUCKING IMPRESSED w/ your recording brotha! But probably for the EXACT SAME REASONS that I LOVE my MBHO setup, because it IS a little bit "brighter" overall, but because of that, the presence and 3D Imaging/Soundstage is IN YOUR FACE, and just has a character of PRESENCE and DETAIL that the Schoeps just DOES NOT HAVE IMO. And yours maintains a KILLER PRESENCE/SOUNDTSGAE/3D IMAGERY, but while also MAINTAINING A PERFECT LOWEND RESPONSE AS WELL. The detail and presence didnt take away from the lwoend AT ALL IMO
What do all of you think
I think BOTH TAPERS DID AN AMAZING JOB, but my vote DEFINITELY and BY FAR goes to the SF source