Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes  (Read 4311 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline guitard

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3723
DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« on: January 24, 2006, 09:08:35 AM »
This is probably a really stupid question... but my curiosity has got the best of me.

They buy box loads of DAT data tapes where I work to backup information on the computer drives.  I could get them really cheap through the office supply.  But... of course, I have to ask the big question - are they any good for recording music?

They are the exact same size as a regular DAT cartridge and I tried one - fits into my Sony D100 just fine.

Curious minds want to know!
Mics: Schoeps MK41s & MK41Vs >:D
Pre-amps: BabyNbox & Platinum Nbox
Deck: Sony A10

Video: Canon HF G70 (4K), Sony FDR AX100 (4K), Pany ZS100 (4K)
Photo: Canon EOS 7D w/ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is III USM

A/V software: Sony Vegas Pro 18 (build 527) 64 bit / DVD Architect Pro 6.0 (build 237)

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2006, 09:46:15 AM »
Oh god - this is one of those debates that I'm glad to see die with DAT!

Search DAT Heads Digest for endless speculation about Data vs DAT....this is an old one!

Offline Josephine

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5215
  • Gender: Female
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2006, 10:11:08 AM »
DDS tapes work just as well as DAT and are lots cheaper.
Like Moke mentioned, you'll want 60 or 90m (meters, not minutes).
:)
Schoeps MK4 / MK4v / MK41 > actives > NBox+ > R-09HR



~   On Dime   ~
~   My Recordings   ~
~   Live Music Archive   ~

kskreider

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2006, 11:24:46 AM »
I am not going to say whether data or audio are better than one another as there are so many differeing opinions.

However, I personally used Maxell HS/4 60m's DDS tapes in my DA-P1 for the 3+ years that I used it and never had a problem.  With some web searching I could often find them for less than $2 a piece.

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2006, 11:38:56 AM »
I used DDS 60 & 90 tapes from 97-05 with no problems on my D8 in the field. 
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline halleyscomet8

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5557
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2006, 11:54:18 AM »
i am having trouble now because all of my 90's are filled with static. but, my 60's are fine >:(. is it my heads or the motor.
my shows on the archive: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/halleyscomet8
And, yes, I know I suck about getting stuff circulated.  ;)

stirinthesauce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2006, 12:46:22 PM »
i am having trouble now because all of my 90's are filled with static. but, my 60's are fine >:(. is it my heads or the motor.

betcha Paul at prodigital can answer that for you, give him a call or an email.   ;)

http://www.prodigitalinc.com/

+t for your troubles

Offline guitard

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3723
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2006, 04:53:02 PM »
Thanks much for all the responses!

One last question ~ does the length of the tape matter?  I ask because most of the tapes we use at the office are of the 170 meter variety.

Thanks!
Mics: Schoeps MK41s & MK41Vs >:D
Pre-amps: BabyNbox & Platinum Nbox
Deck: Sony A10

Video: Canon HF G70 (4K), Sony FDR AX100 (4K), Pany ZS100 (4K)
Photo: Canon EOS 7D w/ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is III USM

A/V software: Sony Vegas Pro 18 (build 527) 64 bit / DVD Architect Pro 6.0 (build 237)

Offline fozzy

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
  • Gender: Male
  • move along, nothing much to see here
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2006, 05:15:40 PM »
Thanks much for all the responses!

One last question ~ does the length of the tape matter?  I ask because most of the tapes we use at the office are of the 170 meter variety.

Thanks!

Most dats you will see in use in offices today(and the past 5 years) are DDS3 and DDS4 tapes which are too long/thin for audio usage.

60m DATs only hold 1.3GB of data @ w/o compression.  So they are pretty useless for real data tape backup purposes with todays HD size.  DDS3/4 run 12-40gigs of storage



MK 4V > KCY 250/5 Ig (KS 10I)  > VST62IUg > 722

Offline dnsacks

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2006, 05:17:30 PM »
170 meter dds tapes will be too thin to reliably work in your dat deck.  Conservatively, you should try to use 60 meter tapes (2 hours @ sp speed) whenever possible and the thinner 90 meter tapes (3 hours at sp speed) only when absolutely necessary. 

Thanks much for all the responses!

One last question ~ does the length of the tape matter?  I ask because most of the tapes we use at the office are of the 170 meter variety.

Thanks!

Offline admkrk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1750
  • I'm an idiot
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2006, 09:28:19 PM »
when i first got my d8, i picked up some 120m thinking they were 120 min. tapes. had no problems w/ the d8. da-30 promptly riped the first one in 2. fwiw

stick to 90m or less
"the faster you go ahead, the behinder you get"

"If you can drink ram's piss, fuck, you can drink anything"

Offline guitard

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3723
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2006, 10:02:21 PM »
60m = 2 hours, 90m = 3 hours

3 hours is questionable as to excessive motor wear. Anything more is beyond that.
Once again - thanks to everyone helping out with all the prompt replies.  I'm pretty sure these will be my last questions ~

I currently have some Sony DT-120 tapes.  In this case, does the "120" indicate minutes or tape length? 

What is the general practice amongst tapers?  After you've recorded a show and transferred it to CD-R - do you keep the tape for archival purposes - or do you reuse it?  If you do reuse them - how many times may you record on them before losing any audio quality?

Thanks!

guitard 
Mics: Schoeps MK41s & MK41Vs >:D
Pre-amps: BabyNbox & Platinum Nbox
Deck: Sony A10

Video: Canon HF G70 (4K), Sony FDR AX100 (4K), Pany ZS100 (4K)
Photo: Canon EOS 7D w/ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is III USM

A/V software: Sony Vegas Pro 18 (build 527) 64 bit / DVD Architect Pro 6.0 (build 237)

Offline admkrk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1750
  • I'm an idiot
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2006, 10:41:41 PM »
60m = 2 hours, 90m = 3 hours

3 hours is questionable as to excessive motor wear. Anything more is beyond that.
Once again - thanks to everyone helping out with all the prompt replies.  I'm pretty sure these will be my last questions ~

I currently have some Sony DT-120 tapes.  In this case, does the "120" indicate minutes or tape length? 

What is the general practice amongst tapers?  After you've recorded a show and transferred it to CD-R - do you keep the tape for archival purposes - or do you reuse it?  If you do reuse them - how many times may you record on them before losing any audio quality?

Thanks!

guitard 

not sure about sony, but most audio dats are labled 4 min over.  124/64/ect. dds tapes always end w/ a 0 afaik.

as moke suggested, i'd never "re-use" a tape for any reason.
"the faster you go ahead, the behinder you get"

"If you can drink ram's piss, fuck, you can drink anything"

Offline jibooer

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1121
  • Gender: Male
  • Searching for the perfect jam...
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2006, 02:34:29 PM »
an important thing to note - i believe if you have a system w/ a DAT drive, the audio dat tapes will not be read properly by the drive...
Mics: AKG c460b (ck61, ck62, ck63, ck1x, ck3x), NBob Actives, Naiant Actives, ADK A-51TL
Pres: Lunatec V2, Sound Devices MP-2
Cables: GAKables exclusively, AKG MK46, Naiant PFA's
Recorders: Edirol R-09HR, Edirol R-44
CPU for DSP: Toshiba Satellite A660 i7 > audioengineD1
Cans: ATH-50
VINYL: Rega Planar 3 > Rega Brio-R > Wharfedale EVO2-30

Offline tchoub

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Gender: Male
Re: DAT: data tapes vs audio tapes
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2006, 03:51:51 PM »
an important thing to note - i believe if you have a system w/ a DAT drive, the audio dat tapes will not be read properly by the drive...
do you mean a system with a DDS drive ?
if so, those that are audio capable will read your audio dat (or dds) tapes without any problem.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 44 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF