Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: UVR vs izotope RX  (Read 725 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline checht

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 832
  • Let's meet at alternate foods at the break
UVR vs izotope RX
« on: December 03, 2024, 08:16:18 PM »
I separate out vocals on most every recording. For SBD vocal feeds, it's a great way to debleed.
For aud 2 track recordings, I separate out vocals and mix them back in in parallel to add presences.
Really cures that 'distant' sound that plagues aud recordings. I find it especially helpful on recordings made with Neumann kmi84s from back in the day.

I've been using RX, currently on v9. Today I tried ultimate vocal remover and I'm shocked by how much better it works. Output is much cleaner intem of not clcutting off the beginning of phrases, and not including sax or guitar that would make it through rx. Also, when listening to it solo, the uvr track is drastically more musicall and natural sounding. To me, RX has always sounded kinda alien on its own.

[edit - uvr runs much faster on my mac mini m3]

What do others use stem separation for, what softwar do you use, and what are your thoughts?
Anyone else compare outputs?

Happy to post samples if wanted.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2024, 08:49:54 PM by checht »
MK41s, MK22s; Vanguard V1s matched pair
Schoeps kcy5, nbob actives
Naiant PFA 60v, PFA 48v, IPA
Sound Devices MP-6II; Sony PCM-A10

Recordings at LMA

Offline kliked

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 166
Re: UVR vs izotope RX
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2024, 09:37:36 PM »
I'm interested in hearing some samples.

Offline robgronotte

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Re: UVR vs izotope RX
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2024, 10:53:17 PM »
Could this be moved to the thread  below?
Someone made a post with a lot of info about vocal separation software and I think it would be much more useful to keep all this kind of discussion together.

Offline checht

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 832
  • Let's meet at alternate foods at the break
Re: UVR vs izotope RX
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2024, 12:11:18 PM »
Could this be moved to the thread  below?
Someone made a post with a lot of info about vocal separation software and I think it would be much more useful to keep all this kind of discussion together.

What thread?
MK41s, MK22s; Vanguard V1s matched pair
Schoeps kcy5, nbob actives
Naiant PFA 60v, PFA 48v, IPA
Sound Devices MP-6II; Sony PCM-A10

Recordings at LMA

Offline robgronotte

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Re: UVR vs izotope RX
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2024, 03:04:52 PM »
Could this be moved to the thread  below?
Someone made a post with a lot of info about vocal separation software and I think it would be much more useful to keep all this kind of discussion together.

What thread?

Oops

https://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=206329.0

Offline checht

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 832
  • Let's meet at alternate foods at the break
Re: UVR vs izotope RX
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2024, 03:46:33 PM »
Reposted original post to the other thread, added link to samples.
MK41s, MK22s; Vanguard V1s matched pair
Schoeps kcy5, nbob actives
Naiant PFA 60v, PFA 48v, IPA
Sound Devices MP-6II; Sony PCM-A10

Recordings at LMA

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF