Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference  (Read 12131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DigiGal

  • AES Associate Member
  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Gender: Female
  • Stay healthy and safe!
    • DigiGal Internet Archive Recordings
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2012, 03:29:00 PM »
Not exactly, it doesn't impead phantom power, it uses the Neutrik integrated LC-filter to avoid RF-interference and LF-noise from their EMC XX series of connectors.  The Neutrik EMC XX incorporates circular capacitors that act as high-pass filters with a cut-off frequency around 10 MHz and also an EMI suppression ferrite bead with 24 ohm at 1 MHz btw. pin 1 and the cable screen providing a low-pass filter for improved RF rejection.

Tech notes: INLINE-EMCM is not designed to remove phantom power.

FWIW: My AKG Bluelines are balanced phantom power only even using the stock optional active cables and they were connected to a balanced recorder providing phntom power.  At any rate I ordered EMC XX connectors to replace the standard NC series Neutrik connectors on my mic cables.

But, yes of course you would need to be running balanced mics to use the SESCOM inline filter.



A pictorial view of the EMC connector, courtesy Neutrik.

http://www.rane.com/pdf/ranenotes/Pin_1_Revisited.pdf
« Last Edit: March 06, 2012, 09:45:40 PM by DigiGal »
Mics: AKG CK91/CK94/CK98/SE300 D-330BT | DPA 4060 4061 4266 | Neumann TLM 103 | Senn ME66/K6/K6RD MKE2 MD421 MD431 | Shure VP88 SM7B SM63L SM58 Anniversary Cables: Gotham GAC-4/1 Quad w/Neutrik EMC | Gotham GAC-2pair w/AKG MK90/3 connectors | DigiGal AES>S/PDIF cable Preamp: SD MixPre-D Recorders: SD MixPre 6 | Marantz PMD 661 Edit: 2011 27" 3.4GHz Quad i7 iMac High Sierra | 2020 13" MBA Quad i7 Catalina | Wave Editor | xACT | Transmission | FCP X 

Offline DigiGal

  • AES Associate Member
  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Gender: Female
  • Stay healthy and safe!
    • DigiGal Internet Archive Recordings
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2012, 05:01:00 PM »
I agree the stock active cables from AKG Blueline's while balanced are really pretty wimpy and probably not shielded all that well.  It would definitely be worthwhile to rewire them with better cable.  I only use the active cables when I need a lower profile but luckily never got hit with cell phone interference using them before.  In addition to the Neutrik EMC connectors I also ordered a few cable samples to examine, if going that route they could be tech flexed together too which would be beneficial for low profile. 
Mics: AKG CK91/CK94/CK98/SE300 D-330BT | DPA 4060 4061 4266 | Neumann TLM 103 | Senn ME66/K6/K6RD MKE2 MD421 MD431 | Shure VP88 SM7B SM63L SM58 Anniversary Cables: Gotham GAC-4/1 Quad w/Neutrik EMC | Gotham GAC-2pair w/AKG MK90/3 connectors | DigiGal AES>S/PDIF cable Preamp: SD MixPre-D Recorders: SD MixPre 6 | Marantz PMD 661 Edit: 2011 27" 3.4GHz Quad i7 iMac High Sierra | 2020 13" MBA Quad i7 Catalina | Wave Editor | xACT | Transmission | FCP X 

Offline kleiner Rainer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 137
  • Gender: Male
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #17 on: March 04, 2012, 08:00:52 AM »
Jon, does it matter where the ferrite bead is placed?  Wondering if it should be placed as close as possible to the recorder/premap end.. or should it work just as effectively placed anywhere on the cable?

Boy, I'm a little weak on antenna theory to answer that.  SparkE or Rainer would know better; I would guess it limits the effective length of the antenna for transmission purposes (which would be good, and probably why it's at the cable ends for digital cables), but for induced noise I don't know.

Hi Jon and the rest of the gang,

antennas are reciprocal: what works for transmission also works for reception. I put clip-on ferrites as close as possible to the input of the recorder and also close to the mic. The reason: many mics we use contain electronic circuits (think phantom power supply components and the FET in electret capsules), and those circuits can and do rectify RF currents present on the cable. No cable shield is perfect, and therefore the wires within the shield will also carry rf currents. If those currents get rectified, they are added to the weak audio signals we want to record. In the case of GSM cell phones, you get the dreaded BRAP-BRAP-BRAP noise, other signals may give a kind of PLOP due to shifts in the DC level.

Another problem is to find out what type of ferrite you just found in your junk box. If you are lucky, it has the right suppression frequency range for your problem. But most of the time, you are probably out of luck...
I can order my ferrite beads via the company since I am involved in EMC work, and we are talking tens of thousands of ferrites I specify, so I can select the correct ferrite material with the correct properties.

Try to find a source where you can get  informations about the frequency range the clip-on ferrite is designed for. If the junk box part doesnt help, this does not mean that the clip-on approach does not work. You simply used the wrong material!

If you build your own mic cables, get the one with the thickest shield (=lowest resistance) and highest coverage ratio (=no voids in the shield). Foil shield with drain wire gives nearly 100% coverage BUT has rather high resistance. I had hum and RF problems with such a cable until I switched to a cable with a really fat braided shield. For hard-core DIYers I can recommend double-shielded teflon isolated RF coax. Its awfully expensive, but the best money can buy...

It is also recommended to use well-made connectors from manufacturers with a reputation of good quality (Switchcraft and Neutrik come to my mind...). It is very important to remember that all shields should be connected with a low-impedance connection. This includes the metal cases of mics and recorders! As soon as there is a hole in your shield, the RF will find it, even if the rest is double-or triple-shielded.

I hope, this sheds some light on the RF noise issue.

Greetings,

Rainer

recording steam trains since 1985

Offline bonghitwillie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 148
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #18 on: March 04, 2012, 01:56:03 PM »
i did not read all the responses. i thought these things are used to eliminate static electricity.

Offline bt2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2012, 03:07:17 AM »
Hi

Sometimes making several loops of the cable and taping them together into a coil of cable can help with RF interference.
I believe this creates some inductance and can reduce the RF which runs along the outer metal skin, which is the shield.
I also want to give a +1 to Rainer's explanation above.

Good luck

Offline Chilly Brioschi

  • The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15467
  • Gender: Male
  • Waiting for the next cladogenetic event, or Godot
    • Oceana North America
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2012, 07:55:20 AM »
Slide-ons work better than snap-ons, for equivalent size and weight.
Be careful that the extra weight doesn't add more problems than it is intended to fix by stressing connectors
"Peace is for everyone"
        - Norah Jones

"Music is the drug that won't kill you"
         - Fran Lebowitz

Offline BlingFree

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 943
  • Gender: Male
  • Working the dumb end of a digital recorder.
    • Lossless Legs
Re: Any experience with snap choke core to eliminate interference
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2012, 09:06:47 PM »
The first two rigs that I ever used were
mics > XLR > deck
and I never once had cell phone issues... even while leaving my phone in the bag.

I didnt even KNOW about the issue until I got my own rig that was like
mics > XLR > preamp > whatever cable > deck

My assumption was that the "whatever cable" is the culprit and it needs to be better shielded like the XLR. I've gotten a quote from GAK for a good RCA > 1/8'.. hope it fixes it.
Audio
* AKG SE-300B / CK 91 > Zoom H6
* powered by i.Sound Portable Power Max - 16000 mAh
Video
*coming soon??**

LMA uploads
bt.etree uploads
YouTube Playlists

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF