phantom adapters and preamps? Could someone explain the point, esspecially for "loud rock"
1st, 853's run 3-wire into a battery box is a shorter signal chain compaired to a phantom adapters and preamps, which will do nothing for you in a "loud rock" situation. I don't see where phantom adapters have any advantage over a 3-wire battery box.
Chris has a good point, even though a preamp is pointless for "loud rock" his 9100 is still smaller than a phantom adapter and phantom supply, and more functional. Additionally there have been some recent threads showing the performance of the at/nady phantom adapters are not as clean as we first expected. Some folks are finding much better results with nainants PFA adapter.
Also, the only folks I ever see suggest that the phantom adapters->ps2 is the best way to run AT's are people that currently run them. I rarely see someone who has owned all setups (phantom adapter, 3-wire, 2-wire) chose phantom adapter.
I could see an argument for phantom adapter vs 1/8", but not phantom adapter vs 3-wire battery box. The only purpose of the phantom adapter was for AT to provide a industry standard balanced solution for long cable runs over choirs. We don't need long balanced cable runs and either of the phantomless options will perform just as well (if not better) for our type of field recording.
If you want large phantom powered preamps and shinny lights, get a pair of SDCs or LDCs. If you want small and unobtrusive, get an 1/8" 4.7k setup.
If you are totally set on using 853's with a phantom rig, get a a pair of U873Rs and run them like a normal mic, they will out perform any of the options outlined above...