Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: getting back into taping after a break  (Read 8813 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JimLash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
getting back into taping after a break
« on: February 21, 2010, 01:23:17 PM »
Hi Tapers,
I am getting back into taping after taking a break for the past 4 years. Ive been taping shows for the better part of 20 years or so before going into "semi-retirement" 4 years ago. My rig consists of Schoeps CCM4's > Sonosax SX-M2 > MicroTrack 24/96 CF Recorder. I also have a pair of Sonic Studios DSM mics and a Sony PCM-M1 Dat recorder.  Ive noticed a whole bunch of nifty new solid state recorders that have come out over the past 4 years and Im seriously considering getting a new recorder and maybe a new mic pre for the CCM4's. I used to be a fairly hardcore fob stealth taper and liked the fact that I could stuff my entire rig down my pants and get it into any show. However now Im not sure how much stealth taping I really want to be doing anymore and so Im thinking about maybe getting a slightly larger recorder. I will probably be mainly recording friends bands and shows that allow taping as it is simply easier. (Yes im getting kind of old and tired! and stealth taping is somewhat of a young mans game and even a team sport to a certain extent) So....the reason for this post is to get some comments and recommendations from some of you. I love my CCM4's and so that is the starting point for any new rig I may get. I am familiar with the Sound Devices decks but dont want to spend that much on a new recorder right now. With that in mind what are some recommendations for recorders and/or mic pres for CCM4's these days? Thanks for your thoughts.
Jim

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2010, 01:33:26 PM »
(Yes im getting kind of old and tired! and stealth taping is somewhat of a young mans game and even a team sport to a certain extent)

I agree, I did stealthing and took a break and came back and don't stealth anymore.

I'd personally keep the sax and just look at a recorder. The new Sony PCM-M10 is small enough that you could have the option for stealthing if you want to, but seems to hold up with a hot line input. If I wasn't going to use my 722, I'd probably get the M10.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline JimLash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2010, 01:45:16 PM »
Would you recommend the Sony M10 over the Marantz 661 or Fostex FR-2LE?

Offline JimLash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2010, 02:03:30 PM »
Well the M10 certainly looks like a serious contender especially for around $300. One small concern I would have is the 1/8" line input. Any comments on what to use cable wise for going from XLR to 1/8" input?

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2010, 02:06:43 PM »
Well the M10 certainly looks like a serious contender especially for around $300. One small concern I would have is the 1/8" line input. Any comments on what to use cable wise for going from XLR to 1/8" input?

If you keep your sonosax in the chain, you can use it's 1/8" out, then just use a standard 1/8 to 1/8 cable.
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2010, 02:11:44 PM »
I use CCM4s as well and think that the Marantz 661 is a fantastic all-in-one recorder to use with them.  It is small, sturdily built, has a very low noise floor, and powers the CCM4s for over 4 hours with Sanyo 2700mAh rechargeable AA batteries.  If you buy it stock it won't cost that much either, if you buy it on ebay with cashback you can probably get it for $500-550.  I have a stock one and it sounds great.  And if you ever decide to stealth occasionally, it is a great deck for that use as well. 

Here's one show I taped open with CCM4 > stock 661:

http://www.archive.org/details/bd2009-11-16.ccm4.flac16


Offline JimLash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2010, 02:13:34 PM »
Wow! What a great idea! Ive never used that output on the Sonosax before. Would I take any quality hit on using the 1/8" output instead of the xlr outs? If not then I think Im getting the M10!

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2010, 02:14:55 PM »
Would you recommend the Sony M10 over the Marantz 661 or Fostex FR-2LE?

If your keeping the sax and would like the option for stealthing, then definitely yes. I ran the Fostex before going to the 722. One problem with it (the fostex) is that your max signal (either mic or line after adjusting trim in your favor) is like +4dbu. The M10's line signal before clipping is like +24dbu so you can run a hotter signal out of your sonosax if you like the sound of it. Plus, it's easy on the wallet.

Others can/will comment on the marantz, I know a couple who use them, but I haven't personally.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline JimLash

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2010, 02:15:40 PM »
The 661 is also very intriguing. How are the built in mic pres compared to the Sonosax?

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2010, 02:19:20 PM »
Wow! What a great idea! Ive never used that output on the Sonosax before. Would I take any quality hit on using the 1/8" output instead of the xlr outs? If not then I think Im getting the M10!

I pulled the sax manual to check and it doesn't say anything related to a lower output which would be my chief reason for using XLR>3.5mm connecting cable (unless the connector is in an ergonomically bad place).
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2010, 03:04:35 PM »
For you, I think the Marantz 661 might be ideal, as su6oxone suggested. Then you can still stealth if you wish to and for open recording the 661 is sure to be better than the FR2-LE as well. Going bigger the 661 is not necessarily better. I hate my Fostex FR2-LE and would much rather use a preamp into the M10's line in.

Anyone want to buy a Busman FR2-LE that he finally got to work, but left a piece of plastic or a screw rattling around inside that I can't get out?
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6792
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2010, 03:21:59 PM »
For you, I think the Marantz 661 might be ideal, as su6oxone suggested. Then you can still stealth if you wish to and for open recording the 661 is sure to be better than the FR2-LE as well. Going bigger the 661 is not necessarily better. I hate my Fostex FR2-LE and would much rather use a preamp into the M10's line in.

Anyone want to buy a Busman FR2-LE that he finally got to work, but left a piece of plastic or a screw rattling around inside that I can't get out?
i like my fr2le

why can't you get it out?
open the "strap" handles and the few screws on the back
slow and gently lift and twist the back "off"
it is held on my wires so go slow
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline Will_S

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2217
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2010, 03:27:23 PM »
Other than an apparently botched mod, what do you hate about the FR2LE?  Couldn't be happier with my stock FR2LE...well I could be if it could record 2 more tracks via line in, but for an all-in-one stereo unit that will run forever on a user-replacable internal battery, I think it's great.

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2010, 04:07:21 PM »
Yeah, I guess the botched mod spoiled my attitude (clicks on every recording no matter what brand of memory card used). Now I hate hearing that rattling noise.

But I really didn't care for the form factor or the internal battery system much. Also sometimes had trouble getting the gain I wanted, and if I need a pre to get the gain I'd rather go with something small like the M10. I don't see the point in a FR2-LE unless used as an all in one box (and apparently most owners think it does this very well). It's just not for me. Would much rather use a littlebox (or MixPre) + small recorder. Plus then you have the small recorder for stealth.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2010, 04:44:47 PM »
Yeah, I guess the botched mod spoiled my attitude (clicks on every recording no matter what brand of memory card used). Now I hate hearing that rattling noise.

But I really didn't care for the form factor or the internal battery system much. Also sometimes had trouble getting the gain I wanted, and if I need a pre to get the gain I'd rather go with something small like the M10. I don't see the point in a FR2-LE unless used as an all in one box (and apparently most owners think it does this very well). It's just not for me. Would much rather use a littlebox (or MixPre) + small recorder. Plus then you have the small recorder for stealth.

Agreed, with the trim system and low max input signal (even for line in), I think it's best used as an all-in-1, and I prefered using mine with a battery pack external to the box. I liked mine when I had it, very few beefs with it, but like most recorders it does have its quirks.

I figured, if you have a sax, and you like the sax, keep the sax (IMHO). Then it's a matter of finding something that has nice A/D and can handle a hot signal (from the sonosax). To me, the M10 fits that description, especially if you are interested in stealthing or are on a budget.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline newplanet7

  • Hasn't heard a muddy 460/480 tape. EVER. Mike Hawk
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3530
  • Gender: Male
  • The Place To Be...... Akustische u. Kino-Geräte
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2010, 06:07:03 PM »
Marantz a/d's are good.
I'd go stock 661 as mentioned. I was wondering how well it would sound stock being that I have a Marantz 660 where the pres had to be modded.
MILAB VM-44 Classic~> Silver T's~> Busman PMD660
News From Phish: Will tour as opening act for Widespread Panic for Summer
hahaha never happen, PHiSH is waaaaayyyy better the WSP

They both ain't got nothing on MMW... Money spent wisely if you ask me...


FYI, it is a kick ass recording of a bunch of pretend-a-hippies talking.

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2010, 07:10:08 PM »
I own a stock 661 and love it, although I've never tried the other two.  As an all-in-one recorder, the  661 is fantastic.  It has decent battery life with AAs, is super easy to operate in the field, is relatively small and light for field recording, has a low noise floor, and has yielded me some nice recordings when I've taped with my mics directly into it.  You can check out some of them on LMA:

http://www.archive.org/details/tlg2010-01-30.ccm4.flac16

http://www.archive.org/details/elmwood2010-01-30.ccm4.flac16

http://www.archive.org/details/bd2009-11-16.ccm4.flac16

http://www.archive.org/details/gpn2009-11-16.ccm4.flac16

I have read posts by several others who love the stock 661 including Digi-Gal and no posts by anyone who got one and did did not like the sound.

Many of the early adopters got it modded just because of the stock 660's bad reputation or there would probably more posts about the stock units.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline newplanet7

  • Hasn't heard a muddy 460/480 tape. EVER. Mike Hawk
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3530
  • Gender: Male
  • The Place To Be...... Akustische u. Kino-Geräte
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2010, 07:20:47 PM »
yep.
Well put.
MILAB VM-44 Classic~> Silver T's~> Busman PMD660
News From Phish: Will tour as opening act for Widespread Panic for Summer
hahaha never happen, PHiSH is waaaaayyyy better the WSP

They both ain't got nothing on MMW... Money spent wisely if you ask me...


FYI, it is a kick ass recording of a bunch of pretend-a-hippies talking.

Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #18 on: February 22, 2010, 02:19:59 PM »
Marantz a/d's are good.
I'd go stock 661 as mentioned. I was wondering how well it would sound stock being that I have a Marantz 660 where the pres had to be modded.

I bought my 661 almost a year ago right out of the gate with the Oade warm mod for 2 reasons. First, the stock unit's best SNR spec for mic in through the XLRs is only 65db, and the XLR line in is only 85db, which is not even as good as a stock 16bit SBM-1 going RCA line in.

Second, I like the sound of FET input chips over the bipolar transistors commonly used in today's modern flash recorders. FETs make the WMOD 661 favor the tone of the old DAT recorders of the '90s.

The SNR specs of the bipolar chips Doug puts in the Concert Mod 661 are down to 125db, and the specs of the FETs he uses in the WMOD 661 are down to 115db.

I really had a hard time buying the 661 stock since it has published line in specs that are not even maximized at 16 bits with 85db SNR, so with a stock unit XLR line in, you are only using 14.7 bits of the 24 bits being allocated.

I would suggest that if you choose a 661 and are determined to start out stock, at least buy one from Doug so that later, you or a subsequent owner can always send it back for one of the modifications.
AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2010, 10:08:00 AM »
I'm not familiar with the sonosax design, but you should be aware that the 661 requires a balanced signal input, in case you're planning on keeping the sax to use in front of the 661.  Both of my Oade pre-amps have unbalanced outputs, so I couldn't use the 661 XLRs without getting lots of noise.  Some people thought that the 1/8 inch line in should work for me, but I still got lots of noise, again I assume because I was supplying an unbalanced signal.  That doesn't make any sense to me, but since I have an ADC and only used the 661 as a bitbucket, I never bothered to try and figure it out. 
« Last Edit: February 28, 2010, 10:16:54 AM by tonedeaf »

Offline jackmf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2010, 11:18:03 PM »

I really had a hard time buying the 661 stock since it has published line in specs that are not even maximized at 16 bits with 85db SNR, so with a stock unit XLR line in, you are only using 14.7 bits of the 24 bits being allocated.

[/quote]

Brad, I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that when I make a line in recording with the unit set to 24-bit, I'm only using 14.7 bits but if I had the unit Oade modded, I would be then using more of the 24?
Busman Audio BSC1>Busman HD-P2 (for sale) or PMD661

Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #21 on: March 01, 2010, 11:17:28 AM »

I really had a hard time buying the 661 stock since it has published line in specs that are not even maximized at 16 bits with 85db SNR, so with a stock unit XLR line in, you are only using 14.7 bits of the 24 bits being allocated.


Brad, I don't understand this comment. Are you saying that when I make a line in recording with the unit set to 24-bit, I'm only using 14.7 bits but if I had the unit Oade modded, I would be then using more of the 24?
[/quote]

You can find much more detailed descriptions of how PCM works by searching this forum, but I will try to simplify. With LPCM, each 6db of dynamic range (the ratio between recorded signal over the noise floor) takes one bit to capture. This means that 16bit PCM A/Ds are theoretically capable of capturing 96db dynamic range, and 24bit PCM is theoretically capable of capturing 144db of dynamic range.

The reason I say "theoretically" is because if the analog source signal feeding into the A/D has an analog noise floor higher than these levels, the actual dynamic range recorded is effectively reduced by the analog noise.

So, if you record an anlog source with only 85db of dynamic range, at 6db per bit, you can do the math to see that the effective bits of dynamic range are 14.7.

The specs of the stock 661 as published means that the unit does not actually achieve even 16 bits of effective dynamic range. This is because the noise of the analog input signal path in the stock unit reduces what it effectively can do, regardless of the bit depth.

The increased SNR of the chips Doug uses on the XLR inputs audibly increases the SNR of the 661 overall, which I have based on my own listening tests of posted sources, so the results are only based on my subjective opinion, just to be clear.

I have never seen a measurement showing how much the improvement is with the mods, but even if the improvement is only 15 to 20db, at least it ends up exceeding 16bit dynamic range. If you are seeking to not alter the tone of the stock unit, you probably would want to stick with the concert mod, since the stock unit comes with bipolar chips and Doug upgrades with a higher quality chip, but the same type. If you are looking for a more vintage quality, go with the FET sound of the warm mod.


« Last Edit: March 01, 2010, 11:19:00 AM by DATBRAD »
AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #22 on: March 01, 2010, 01:19:56 PM »
Wow! What a great idea! Ive never used that output on the Sonosax before. Would I take any quality hit on using the 1/8" output instead of the xlr outs? If not then I think Im getting the M10!

Keep in mind that the m10 is still new and has not yet been proven sound-wise running line-in.  There are a lot of people talking about how great the internal mics sound (bfd!) but we have yet to have a good comp with a pre-amp in front.  We also don't know how the line-in overloads with a hot signal.  We do know that it cannot take a pro-level signal, and it isn't clear what is 'too hot'.

The r09 and r09hr have been well tested and comps have been posted that compare it to the v3's built-in a/d.  We also know that if you turn the gain down too far on the r09 and r09hr, they will chop the waveform, even though it is not clipping.  That has been known for a long time, but it took quite a while before people accepted it.

I've been curious about the 661.  Though as others have mentioned, the specs on paper are pretty cruddy.  I wonder what the specs are after Oade mods it?  Using the specs of the chips Oade installs is not valid (that's microtrack math!).  It'd be nice to get a v3 a/d comp against the 661.

The reports that the 661 can't take an unbalanced signal without introducing noise are disturbing..   Wonder what's up with that?  I imagine Doug knows.  Pretty much all of the "cellphone interference" posts I've seen on this board were from 660 owners. Maybe a coincidence..

I have yet to find a "stand alone" recorder with internal pre-amps that has the transparency and soundstage of the v3 (or similar).  Even the 7xx.  Though it takes good playback to hear it.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #23 on: March 01, 2010, 02:06:21 PM »
^^^ FWIW I have run DPA 4021>Littlebox>M10 numerous times with fine results.  I generally just left the M10 gain at 5 and adjusted levels on the pre.  Line input sounds nice and clean to me.  Though I grant that (1) despite the favorable comp done on here by Todd R, the Littlebox is obviously not a V3 and (2) I didn't have anything to compare it to, other than that it sounds pretty much the same to me as running 4021>R-44.  But again, the internal pre of the R-44 isn't a V3, either.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2010, 02:30:01 PM »
Wow! What a great idea! Ive never used that output on the Sonosax before. Would I take any quality hit on using the 1/8" output instead of the xlr outs? If not then I think Im getting the M10!

Keep in mind that the m10 is still new and has not yet been proven sound-wise running line-in.  There are a lot of people talking about how great the internal mics sound (bfd!) but we have yet to have a good comp with a pre-amp in front.  We also don't know how the line-in overloads with a hot signal.  We do know that it cannot take a pro-level signal, and it isn't clear what is 'too hot'.

The r09 and r09hr have been well tested and comps have been posted that compare it to the v3's built-in a/d.  We also know that if you turn the gain down too far on the r09 and r09hr, they will chop the waveform, even though it is not clipping.  That has been known for a long time, but it took quite a while before people accepted it.

I've been curious about the 661.  Though as others have mentioned, the specs on paper are pretty cruddy.  I wonder what the specs are after Oade mods it?  Using the specs of the chips Oade installs is not valid (that's microtrack math!).  It'd be nice to get a v3 a/d comp against the 661.

The reports that the 661 can't take an unbalanced signal without introducing noise are disturbing..   Wonder what's up with that?  I imagine Doug knows.  Pretty much all of the "cellphone interference" posts I've seen on this board were from 660 owners. Maybe a coincidence..

I have yet to find a "stand alone" recorder with internal pre-amps that has the transparency and soundstage of the v3 (or similar).  Even the 7xx.  Though it takes good playback to hear it.

I agree that you cannot directly infer the overall SNR improvement with modded 661s simply by the improvement in the spec for the input opamps. I have done several A/B comparisons with kingkita who runs 480s into a V3, when our mics were together on the same stand, and we both agree that the WMOD 661 that I have, running line in from my external SD MP-1 preamps, is comparable in terms of clarity, noise floor, and overall quality with the V3. What is clearest in terms of differences is the warmer tone on the WMOD 661.

I will have to ask Doug next time I talk to him what the overall SNR for line and mic through the XLRs are for each type of his mods and report back. I am sure he has measured stock against each of the 3 mods he does for the 661.

I have made SBDs unbalanced line in through the XLRs several times, using a pair of M-XLR to F-RCA adapters on the recorder, and made great recordings without any audible noise issues.

Hope this helps.
AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2010, 03:55:34 PM »
The increased SNR of the chips Doug uses on the XLR inputs audibly increases the SNR of the 661 overall, which I have based on my own listening tests of posted sources, so the results are only based on my subjective opinion, just to be clear.

Which A/B comparisons exactly did you base this conclusion on?  If you're comparing different sources in different venues with different mics and so forth, that wouldn't really be anything worth basing any conclusions on.  I've used the stock 661 for multiple shows (mics connected directly to XLR mic-in with phantom) with peaks at or even below -20dB and even after normalizing to 0dB the noise floor is remarkably low, comparable to the 702. 

Now, I can see how you might subjectively prefer the sound of your modded 661 (versus 'subjectively' believing the SNR to be higher) but your repeated disparaging remarks about the stock 661 are puzzling to say the least.  I know you love the Oade brothers and their mods, but no need to trash the stock 661 purportedly based on its specs.  Just sayin.'  ;)
« Last Edit: March 01, 2010, 03:57:13 PM by su6oxone »

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2010, 04:16:46 PM »
I have done several A/B comparisons with kingkita who runs 480s into a V3, when our mics were together on the same stand, and we both agree that the WMOD 661 that I have, running line in from my external SD MP-1 preamps, is comparable in terms of clarity, noise floor, and overall quality with the V3.

Cool.   Line-in performance is critical to me - as much as I might like to run without a pre-amp, I don't expect it will happen anytime soon..  I'd like to find an a/d equivalent or better than the 7xx.  The r09 is not equivalent, but it is surprisingly good.  And as I've mentioned many times before, it is surprising that the r09 has been preferred here in blind comps to the v3's a/d (which is quieter and cleaner).  So as much as I like the v3 as a pre, I'm not so keen on it as an a/d.

I left out an important qualifier in my previous post - the differences I'm referring to would be most noticeable when recording something with a 3d soundstage.  A bunch of horns, strings, bluegrass, etc.  So on-stage or stage lip, and not through a PA.  And the good playback is also critical - something that can image depth, outside the speakers, etc.  The trumpet in the far back row may be the loudest sound on the recording, but does it still sound like it's in back?  How precisely are the individual components of the drum kit imaged?   How much of that remains when things get really loud? 

Sometimes these subjective impressions require dozens and dozens of recordings in familiar venues, etc, before the opinion is definitive.  So for me it is definitive (external pre-amps can sound better than the 7xx standalone), but still subjective.

So I don't think I can definitively compare gear for the cases I am most interested in if the recording is of a PA.

Quote
I have made SBDs unbalanced line in through the XLRs several times, using a pair of M-XLR to F-RCA adapters on the recorder, and made great recordings without any audible noise issues.

Good to hear.  I wonder what was up with those reports I read?


Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2010, 04:23:59 PM »
The increased SNR of the chips Doug uses on the XLR inputs audibly increases the SNR of the 661 overall, which I have based on my own listening tests of posted sources, so the results are only based on my subjective opinion, just to be clear.

Which A/B comparisons exactly did you base this conclusion on?  If you're comparing different sources in different venues with different mics and so forth, that wouldn't really be anything worth basing any conclusions on.  I've used the stock 661 for multiple shows (mics connected directly to XLR mic-in with phantom) with peaks at or even below -20dB and even after normalizing to 0dB the noise floor is remarkably low, comparable to the 702. 

Now, I can see how you might subjectively prefer the sound of your modded 661 (versus 'subjectively' believing the SNR to be higher) but your repeated disparaging remarks about the stock 661 are puzzling to say the least.  I know you love the Oade brothers and their mods, but no need to trash the stock 661 purportedly based on its specs.  Just sayin.'  ;)

Dude, I know you are proud of your stock unit, and good for you. That is what taping is all about. It's supposed to be for what the taper's ear likes, not anyone else. I agree that listening to different sources from different venues and mics is not as solid as comparisons where all variables are the same except the control, stock vs. modded 661, but I still came to the same conclusions with my ears. I have been taping for 26 years, so my old ears are probably not as good as your way younger ears are. I was clear that my views were subjective, so if you know me personally, you know how valid my opinions are, and if not, take it or leave it.

AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2010, 04:27:54 PM »
I agree that listening to different sources from different venues and mics is not as solid as comparisons where all variables are the same except the control, stock vs. modded 661, but I still came to the same conclusions with my ears.

 ;D

runonce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2010, 04:37:46 PM »
Hi Tapers,
I am getting back into taping after taking a break for the past 4 years. Ive been taping shows for the better part of 20 years or so before going into "semi-retirement" 4 years ago. My rig consists of Schoeps CCM4's > Sonosax SX-M2 > MicroTrack 24/96 CF Recorder. I also have a pair of Sonic Studios DSM mics and a Sony PCM-M1 Dat recorder.  Ive noticed a whole bunch of nifty new solid state recorders that have come out over the past 4 years and Im seriously considering getting a new recorder and maybe a new mic pre for the CCM4's. I used to be a fairly hardcore fob stealth taper and liked the fact that I could stuff my entire rig down my pants and get it into any show. However now Im not sure how much stealth taping I really want to be doing anymore and so Im thinking about maybe getting a slightly larger recorder. I will probably be mainly recording friends bands and shows that allow taping as it is simply easier. (Yes im getting kind of old and tired! and stealth taping is somewhat of a young mans game and even a team sport to a certain extent) So....the reason for this post is to get some comments and recommendations from some of you. I love my CCM4's and so that is the starting point for any new rig I may get. I am familiar with the Sound Devices decks but dont want to spend that much on a new recorder right now. With that in mind what are some recommendations for recorders and/or mic pres for CCM4's these days? Thanks for your thoughts.
Jim

Since you are giving up stealthing...are you certain you need to limit yourself to battery powered gear? "Friends band" = AC Power

2 rackspaces can make a nice rig. Lots of nice Pre/AD combos.

And you could probably still just use the Microtrack as a bit bucket. (assuming its a proven device for that task)

Sounds like you already have a nice portable rig for the occasions you cant get AC power.

I use a dbx396 tube preamp...built in 24/96 AD. Not sure I'd truly "recommend" it...I love it. But I have a feeling thats more about my taste - and I've only compared it to a handful of others.  (Im also a bit foggy about the powering needs of your mics.)

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #30 on: March 02, 2010, 08:54:19 AM »
I have nothing more really to say about all of this except i ran a stock 671 (im assuming its very simular to the 661) for several years and my ears really liked the a/d on it.  That being said, if you decide to go with something different, I will take that sonasax off you hands ;D  LEts make a deal :o
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: getting back into taping after a break
« Reply #31 on: March 02, 2010, 10:04:18 AM »

Good to hear.  I wonder what was up with those reports I read?

I think you're referring to one of my previous posts.  Honestly, after thinking about it some more, I have to revise my input to say that I don't know what was up with the 661.  In retrospect, perhaps I shouldn't have posted because I didn't fully diagnose what my own issue was.  Since I was using the 661 as a bitbucket, I never needed to figure it out further. 

Anyway, when I had the 661, I wanted to test how the unit sounded through the XLRs, so I set it up with my Oade preamps outputting to the XLRs.  In this configuration, I was getting significant noise using the XLRs.  Since I'd read previously that unbalanced inputs to the 661 was a no-go, I just made an assumption that was the problem and didn't diagnose any further.  However, now that I'm thinking more about it, since I didn't do any diagnosis for myself, I don't know for sure if this is absolutely true...my previous statement was based on an assumption that what I'd read about the XLRs was actually true.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2010, 10:06:33 AM by tonedeaf »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.259 seconds with 57 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF