Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: V3>HHB or P1  (Read 2908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
V3>HHB or P1
« on: April 27, 2006, 12:20:49 AM »
So after reading several of the AES threads, what is best way to run from a V3 to an XLR-equipped DAT deck?  Coax is obviously an option (digi-out on V3, digi-in on recorder), but is there a befefit to running through the AES?  I suppose a benefit is the locking XLR connector, but if you use an S/PDIF cable with locking barrels there is no difference there.  Does it matter?
Socks are overrated.

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2006, 04:57:13 AM »
No benefit. Same standard for transport of digital audio..I guess the only advantage in your case would be the locking barrels.

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2006, 02:46:54 PM »
Thank you SIR!
Socks are overrated.

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2006, 02:55:16 PM »
Much obliged Mike.

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2006, 03:08:53 PM »
the peak-to-peak voltage of an AES signal is greater than that of an S/PDIF signal.  if it were a longer run, I think AES would be a better option.  assuming a short run from the V3 > DAT deck, as Teddy said, it shouldn't make any difference.

one other thing to consider, is if you expect to have patchers.  if you take the AES signal from the V3, you can give any patchers a signal from the coax output.  I don't know if that's really a concern or not, but something to think about...

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2006, 12:46:27 AM »
the peak-to-peak voltage of an AES signal is greater than that of an S/PDIF signal.  if it were a longer run, I think AES would be a better option.  assuming a short run from the V3 > DAT deck, as Teddy said, it shouldn't make any difference.

one other thing to consider, is if you expect to have patchers.  if you take the AES signal from the V3, you can give any patchers a signal from the coax output.  I don't know if that's really a concern or not, but something to think about...
Ah...good point.  I use a right angle splitter off the coax out, so I always have a free patch.
Socks are overrated.

Offline Teen Wolf Blitzer

  • It's all ballbearings these days.
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5310
  • Gender: Male
  • I am Rattus Norvegicus.
    • Support Festival Radio
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2006, 10:57:01 AM »
What are you running dat for?  Didn't you get an R4?  Oh and your Sons dvd's go out tommorow.   ;D

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
Re: V3>HHB or P1
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2006, 11:55:40 PM »
What are you running dat for?  Didn't you get an R4?  Oh and your Sons dvd's go out tommorow.   ;D
I picked up an HHB for my back up.  I just REALLY love DAT, and even though the digital stuff is easier and cleaner, I'd like to keep some sort of DAT running.
Socks are overrated.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.066 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF