Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: how good are the converters in edirol UA-5?  (Read 6389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jnorman34

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
how good are the converters in edirol UA-5?
« on: November 03, 2003, 08:47:48 PM »
i record to a roland vs1880. are the converters in the edirol ua-5 better than the converters in the roland? thanks.

Offline mirth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2508
  • Gender: Male
  • Les Hommes Savvent Pourquois
Re:how good are the converters in edirol UA-5?
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2003, 09:53:26 PM »
The UA-5 isn't bit perfect. Is the Roland?
Governor Jim McGreevey was equally disturbed about the upcoming population increase. "New Jersey cannot support all of these wookies," he said. "For starters, we don't have nearly enough kindbud. At best, we can muster up a Q.P. of some beasties, but we've not a dime-bag more."

Offline drewloo

  • Friend of Salsa
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • it's recreational
Re:how good are the converters in edirol UA-5?
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2003, 05:48:24 AM »
I thought I heard somewhere that the A/D in the UA-5 is the same chip as the one in the Mini-Me.

As far as it not being bit-perfect, that's only true when you're giving it a digital signal (like from a D8 or the like). The reason it isn't bit-perfect is because it resamples digital sources.  If you're giving the UA-5 an analog signal then it's not an issue because there's nothing to resample.

hope this helps,
Drew
« Last Edit: November 06, 2003, 06:01:08 AM by drewloo »

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re:how good are the converters in edirol UA-5?
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2003, 11:11:33 AM »
I thought I heard somewhere that the A/D in the UA-5 is the same chip as the one in the Mini-Me.

As far as it not being bit-perfect, that's only true when you're giving it a digital signal (like from a D8 or the like). The reason it isn't bit-perfect is because it resamples digital sources.  If you're giving the UA-5 an analog signal then it's not an issue because there's nothing to resample.

hope this helps,
Drew

The UA-5 does a very good job with A/D. The chip used is the same as the one in the Mini-Me according to Doug Oade.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.039 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF