Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII  (Read 105112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lefty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #105 on: July 26, 2006, 08:06:42 PM »
not sure if someone has mentioned the 150x ridata cards.  i did a ton of research for my digital photography and use the 2GB 150x version with no problems and i love the speed.  if i end up getting an R09 i'll get this card

The requirements of digital photography are completely different than recording.

how so?  its all about write speed and capacity, no?  please elaborate and drop and name for a card to check out.. thanks
Retired Rig: Audio Technica 853s > Sound Professionals 12v BB > Sony PCM-M1 or MZ-N1

PM me if you want to help with a digital transfer of some unseeded Beck shows:
DAT 2003-06-24 SDSU Open Air Theatre, San Diego
DAT 2003-06-26 Santa Barbara County Bowl, Santa Barbara
MD 2003-06-27 Irvine Meadows Amphitheater, Irvine
MD 2005-07-18 Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, San Francisco

Offline SunWizard

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #106 on: July 26, 2006, 08:15:25 PM »
Faster is not better for recording and in some cases its much worse, adding noise or not working at all.   See this thread for more details: http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=68824.0
AT853 (CMC-4)>3wire batt.box or SP box >Edirol R-09 or iRiver H120 or JB3
C4 > D-mod UA-5 >Edirol R-09 or iRiver H120 or JB3

Offline lefty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #107 on: July 26, 2006, 08:17:26 PM »
Faster is not better for recording and in some cases its much worse, adding noise or not working at all.   See this thread for more details: http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=68824.0
yep.. just found this thread too...

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=66815.0  bummer.. the ritek card has a lifetime warranty too.. i'll check for "slow" cards that have lifetime warranty.... thanks again

Retired Rig: Audio Technica 853s > Sound Professionals 12v BB > Sony PCM-M1 or MZ-N1

PM me if you want to help with a digital transfer of some unseeded Beck shows:
DAT 2003-06-24 SDSU Open Air Theatre, San Diego
DAT 2003-06-26 Santa Barbara County Bowl, Santa Barbara
MD 2003-06-27 Irvine Meadows Amphitheater, Irvine
MD 2005-07-18 Bill Graham Civic Auditorium, San Francisco

Offline sleepypedro

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4140
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #108 on: July 27, 2006, 08:13:49 AM »
Faster is not better for recording and in some cases its much worse, adding noise or not working at all.   See this thread for more details: http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=68824.0

just for argument's sake, before you spread the FUD further, has anyone reported any issues with high-speed secure digital cards in the r09?

not that i've read.

/just sayin'

Offline tonyvt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
  • Bocephus
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #109 on: July 27, 2006, 09:08:48 AM »
I have been using several (3) of the Transcend 150X 2gb cards and no problems yet.
I'm a Bluegrasshole.

Offline SunWizard

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #110 on: July 27, 2006, 11:00:27 AM »
Faster is not better for recording and in some cases its much worse, adding noise or not working at all.   See this thread for more details: http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=68824.0

just for argument's sake, before you spread the FUD further, has anyone reported any issues with high-speed secure digital cards in the r09?

not that i've read.

That speed advice comes from Roland (Edirol) tech support, in this thread:
http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=66815.0

And its not surprising after noting that nearly every flash based recorder is reporting problems with some of the faster cards in other threads.
Whats FUD mean?
AT853 (CMC-4)>3wire batt.box or SP box >Edirol R-09 or iRiver H120 or JB3
C4 > D-mod UA-5 >Edirol R-09 or iRiver H120 or JB3

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696

Offline sleepypedro

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4140
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #112 on: July 27, 2006, 11:06:57 AM »

That speed advice comes from Roland (Edirol) tech support, in this thread:
http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=66815.0

And its not surprising after noting that nearly every flash based recorder is reporting problems with some of the faster cards in other threads.
Whats FUD mean?

I'm aware it's been said, I'm asking if anyone here has actually reported issues with a high-speed card and the r09.  i don't believe the answer to that is 'yes'.

FUD = Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

there's always a good deal of FUD in circulation when we're dealing with new devices and new technologies, this is no exception.  while i certainly value the opinion of edirol techs, anecdotal evidence from end users is invaluable.

Offline SClassical

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #113 on: July 27, 2006, 04:40:29 PM »
Quote

I'm aware it's been said, I'm asking if anyone here has actually reported issues with a high-speed card and the r09.  i don't believe the answer to that is 'yes'.


My Lexar 80X card had more problems than my Kingston Elite 50X card in my other recorder. Maybe it's due to the brand or Speed - don't really know. But I feel safer recording with my Kingston 50X card than with my Lexar 80X card when using my other solid state recorder.

Would like to know apart from Transcend if other 4GB SD brands would work fine with the R-09. I guess no one tried other 4GB SD brands?
Mics: DPA3552 kit/DPA3521 kit/DPA SMK4081 kit/DPA SMK4060 kit/Schoeps 2X MK21, 2X MK22 and 2X MK4v and 2X Schoeps CCM2S
Mixers/preamps: Sonosax SX-M32/Sonosax SX-M2 LS/Grace Design V3/DPA MMA6000/Millennia HV-32P
Recorders: SD722/PCM-D50/MT2
Playback: Grace m903 - Sennheiser HD650 / Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus 805s

Offline Scuba Jeremy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 735
  • Gender: Male
  • "Ugh, is that digi noise?"
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #114 on: July 28, 2006, 12:37:39 AM »
So I want to get this straight - the R09 is still limited by the 2GB limit that affects all .wav files by their very nature. So what happens when the recording goes over that limit?
« Last Edit: July 28, 2006, 12:41:49 AM by Scuba Jeremy »

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #115 on: July 28, 2006, 02:08:50 AM »
nothing while you are recording.  the limitation is with your software you use for editing. 
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #116 on: July 28, 2006, 08:43:55 AM »
So what happens when the recording goes over that limit?

You enjoy the show and smile with no worries.

Offline Scuba Jeremy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 735
  • Gender: Male
  • "Ugh, is that digi noise?"
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #117 on: July 28, 2006, 01:48:45 PM »
So what happens when the recording goes over that limit?

You enjoy the show and smile with no worries.

;D Excellent! +Ts to you and Leehookem, thanks guys! Can't wait to pop the cherry on my R09 tonight! Hitting up Ray Lamontagne and Guster.

Offline bubbybooshay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #118 on: July 29, 2006, 01:06:04 PM »
think i may have to get one of these things, by reading all this they seem to be working pretty good
mk41, c4's > nbox, Lunatec V3 > mt24/96, hdp2, sd722

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: Edirol R-09 Release Information -ptII
« Reply #119 on: July 29, 2006, 01:30:37 PM »
Minor gotcha on the r09 last night.. Recorded 2+ hours @ 24/48.. When I was done I wanted to review the peaks, etc on the way home but it said the file was only 1 second long. The file size displayed as 1.X GB so I wasn't too worried and figured it was just a 2GB+ file display bug.  Copied the file off just fine. It was about 2.7GB. That was with 1.03.

So don't freak if this happens.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF