Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Photo / Video Recording => Topic started by: teamakg on September 26, 2006, 03:40:44 PM
-
would i be better off getting the XTi with the canon lens for $900 or am i better off getting the body only for $800 and then spending that other $100 to get a better basic lens? i would be spending that $100 plus some more on a new lens.
-
depends. what kind of shooting do you plan to do and what is your budget?
my initial reaction is to say that you should buy the body only and get a better lens. that kit lens isn't all that great...
-
Kit Lens = Sucky (soft and slow)
But it also depends. You planning on doing any low-light, no flash concert photography? If so, you're going to need a FAST lens. FAST = $$$$. However, one alternative, is to go fo a "prime" lens with a fixed focal length. I think you can get a canon fixed 50mm f1.8 for seriously $79. It feels like a toy, but it takes super-sharp images a few stops up from f1.8, and then you have the fast-as-hell f1.8 with the XTi's ISO1600 for those no-light, no-flash moments of need. But, hey, that's only one lens, and one without zoom, and with the crop of 1.6x on the rebel, it's like really having a 80mm, so forget about wide shots. You will shortly need another lens. But you already know that. The thing is, that kit lens starts at f3.5 and goes up from there with zoom (I think). That's probably not going to cut it for low-light, no-flash -- but not sure you care? Anyway, that's one option...
-
until i get the hang of it i'm basically going to point and shoot with it. i just want a general purpose lens that i can use in various shooting situations. it doesn't need to be super good at any one thing. just average across the board. then once i see where it lacks i'll buy different lens accordingly. thanks for the quick replies! +T's around.
-
Might want to take a look at these guys (brooklyn, NY), you should be able to get the body and then get the lens of your choice for the same budget....Do Your Homework(everything I have read is positive, but I want to read more before I purchase there)
http://www.bestpricecameras.com/prodetails.asp?prodid=713192
-
I'd run from that store.....
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller8754.html
Many of the Brroklyn based camera stores are very shady. B&H is one of the notable exceptions. You generally cant get screaming deals on the digital SLR's. If the reseller is way below the normal price, something is shady. All that said, I'd agree that the body with a lens other than the kit is the way to go. The Canon kit lans is particularly bad. There are some nice midrange zooms out there for the $200-400 range that will probably make you much happier in the long run.
-
I have a similar question. Pretty soon down the road I'm looking to delve into the DSLR thing and I really like the Nikon D50 for performance and price. I'd like a zoom lense, so I've thought about this package (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=381587&is=REG&addedTroughType=search). But I also want to do ultra-low light photography. Any recommendations on a lense for that, or do I need to be set straight about the zoom lense too?
-
Might want to take a look at these guys (brooklyn, NY), you should be able to get the body and then get the lens of your choice for the same budget....Do Your Homework(everything I have read is positive, but I want to read more before I purchase there)
http://www.bestpricecameras.com/prodetails.asp?prodid=713192
You've got to be kidding, LOL!
-
internet camera stores are among the biggest rip-off artists out there. be very careful. there is typically no reason to buy from anyone other than B&H, Adorama, and 17th Street Photo. those 3 are extremely reputable, and do not create those bullshit over priced bundles (body plus 2 crappy lenses, table top tripod, crappy bag, etc for "one low price"). plus, a lot of those stores will not get you warranty credit so be careful.
-
i'm assuming no but figured i should ask, any issues buying from amazon.com? thanks again for the comments.
-
i'm assuming no but figured i should ask, any issues buying from amazon.com? thanks again for the comments.
i would imagine you're not buying from amazon itself, you would be buying from a third party seller through amazon. i think they can be spotty at times. i ordered a tennis racket from one last year and though it was in stock it took 3 weeks to get it, multiple emails and phone calls before the fuckers would finally send it.
-
good point. i'll make sure that if i do go the amazon.com route that it's from them and not a 3rd party.
-
Might want to take a look at these guys (brooklyn, NY), you should be able to get the body and then get the lens of your choice for the same budget....Do Your Homework(everything I have read is positive, but I want to read more before I purchase there)
http://www.bestpricecameras.com/prodetails.asp?prodid=713192
You've got to be kidding, LOL!
actually no...I have ordered from broadway photo ( http://www.resellerratings.com/seller1995.html ) on several occasions, and their rating is the same thing on that website....i dont believe only one site...they have 500+ positive ratings on other sites...(could be fraud)...thats why i gave the disclaimer. i call and talk and find out the details up front..if i dont like it..i dont buy....of course its not for everyone...but i have saved alot of money that route...someday I will prolly get burned...who knows...
-
internet camera stores are among the biggest rip-off artists out there. be very careful. there is typically no reason to buy from anyone other than B&H, Adorama, and 17th Street Photo. those 3 are extremely reputable, and do not create those bullshit over priced bundles (body plus 2 crappy lenses, table top tripod, crappy bag, etc for "one low price"). plus, a lot of those stores will not get you warranty credit so be careful.
I'd add to that list samys, normans, ephotocraft, roberts. There are alot of other internet stores to consider.
-
Kit Lens = Sucky (soft and slow)...
I kinda disagree. While I got the XT and already "replaced" the kit lens, you can get great pictures from it. It's worth it if you can keep it to less than $100 difference. (I would buy the thrifty fifty or the nifty fifty in addition to the kit lens)
http://www.photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=185522
That thread shows off what the 18mm-55mm can do.
-
Point taken. But I did also say...
But it also depends. You planning on doing any low-light, no flash concert photography?
It depends. And more importantly, I asked if he planned on doing any low light, no flash concert photography. If so, f3.5+ is going to be a disadvantage even when running at ISO1600+. Most (not all) of those nice pics in that thread are in good lighting and not under the restriction of no flash. So, it's just something to remember. But there's no doubt for $100, the lens isn't bad at all.