Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Poll

Which do you prefer, and which do you think is which?

A - R-09
1 (4.2%)
A - R-09HR
0 (0%)
B - R-09
1 (4.2%)
B - R-09HR
4 (16.7%)
No preference
3 (12.5%)
Just want to see some results
15 (62.5%)

Total Members Voted: 24

Author Topic: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR  (Read 7861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
[DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« on: June 03, 2008, 08:25:41 PM »
This is an ADC line-in comparison between the Edirol R-09 and R-09HR. For the ADC test, I ran as follows:

Pioneer DV-588-A CD/SACD/DVD-A deck > Kind Kables (RCA > mini) > recorder (24/48 line-in)

I chose to record at 24/48 because it's the highest available on the R-09 and it is the recording format I will personally be using.

The R-09 was set at level 8, and the R-09HR was set at level 35. This results in approximately the same final recording gain for the two (see the R-09HR thread for more details http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,100541.msg1400415.html#msg1400415). I initially tried the default inputs (13 and 40, respectfully), but was clipping.

The discs used for the comparison are as follows:
Track 1 - Grateful Dead - American Beauty DVD-A, Box Of Rain
Track 2 - Nickel Creek - Nickel Creek SACD, The Lighthouse's Tale

I recorded appx 90sec of each track. Disregard any clicks you may hear at the beginning of the recording, as it was me pressing play/track switch. The files are an A-B blind test, with A-1 being track 1 for recorder A, B-1 being track 1 for recorder B, etc.

The 24/48 FLAC files (encoded to FLAC level 8 using xACT) may be downloaded below:

A-1: http://www.mediafire.com/?cxcwskmzf47
B-1: http://www.mediafire.com/?td9wjlcd1zo

A-2: http://www.mediafire.com/?mnezssyzedn
B-2: http://www.mediafire.com/?ylejmtsnmyw

FFP: http://www.mediafire.com/?7cytduujxsy

After a few days or no activity in this thread, I will post the key. For those who are impatient, you can PM me for the key.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2008, 07:46:40 AM by bgalizio »

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2008, 10:48:39 PM »
I'm impacient. I'll PM you. ;D
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2008, 04:03:22 PM »
This is an ADC line-in comparison between the Edirol R-09 and R-09HR. For the ADC test, I ran as follows:

Pioneer DV-588-A CD/SACD/DVD-A deck > Kind Kables (RCA > mini) > recorder (24/48 line-in)

I chose to record at 24/48 because it's the highest available on the R-09 and it is the recording format I will personally be using.

The R-09 was set at level 8, and the R-09HR was set at level 35. This results in approximately the same final recording gain for the two (see the R-09HR thread for more details http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,100541.msg1400415.html#msg1400415). I initially tried the default inputs (13 and 40, respectfully), but was clipping.

The discs used for the comparison are as follows:
Track 1 - Grateful Dead - American Beauty DVD-A, Box Of Rain
Track 2 - Nickel Creek - Nickel Creek SACD, The Lighthouse's Tale

I recorded appx 90sec of each track. Disregard any clicks you may hear at the beginning of the recording, as it was me pressing play/track switch. The files are an A-B blind test, with A-1 being track 1 for recorder A, B-1 being track 1 for recorder B, etc.

The 24/48 FLAC files (encoded to FLAC level 8 using xACT) may be downloaded below:

A-1: http://www.mediafire.com/?cxcwskmzf47
B-1: http://www.mediafire.com/?td9wjlcd1zo

A-2: http://www.mediafire.com/?mnezssyzedn
B-2: http://www.mediafire.com/?ylejmtsnmyw

FFP: http://www.mediafire.com/?7cytduujxsy

After a few days or no activity in this thread, I will post the key. For those who am impatient, you can PM me for the key.

Well, that's a tricky one ;). They both sound great. But to my ears, samples A are more light and less defined on the bass side.
For this alone I'd choose samples B.
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2008, 07:50:16 AM »
Bump. I thought more people would be interested in this comp.

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2008, 06:57:26 PM »
I am but cant find my good Shure head phones LOL
Ill run it vis speakers when the download ends

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2008, 11:54:42 PM »
Bump. I thought more people would be interested in this comp.

Why don't you just move the whole thing to the recording gear area? Sure there would be more interested people there. ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2008, 07:32:42 AM »
Bump. I thought more people would be interested in this comp.

Why don't you just move the whole thing to the recording gear area? Sure there would be more interested people there. ;)


Good call - mods, could you move this thread to the recording gear section?

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2008, 11:20:01 AM »
I want to say the #2 samples are the R9HR, but really, I think any difference I am hearing is all psychological, i.e. not there except for in my head. *laughs*

They both sounded great through tube amp plus Klipsch speakers, and my Grado SR80 headphones and I can't tell a difference.


Offline cl516

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
  • Gender: Male
    • cl516 blog
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2008, 12:09:00 PM »
well i can only listen through a laptop speaker right now, so i won't even try

Offline HarpDoc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Gender: Male
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2008, 01:52:53 PM »
I also vote B. Fuller sound.

Offline spyder9

  • Trade Count: (82)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 13198
  • Gender: Male
  • "Are you Zman?"
    • My Archived shows
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2008, 03:30:24 PM »
I prefer the B tracks.  Big bell-bottom bass, recessed highs, and passive mids.  A and B aren't that close sounding.  A tracks sound like they have some air in the them and lack the bass response that B has.  Overall, they both sound great. 

Thanks Ben!    ;D 

Offline GregDunn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2008, 04:11:40 PM »
Very difficult to pick a clear winner for me.  I "think" B has a little more clarity and the string plucking might be more defined, but not enough to get worked up over.  :)  Track 2 is actually a little better for this test IMHO because it makes use of lower level signals where I would expect the A/Ds to have more differences.

As for which one is a "better" copy of the source - No idea what the original recordings sounded like, though I suppose I could run out and buy them for the purpose of the test.   ;D

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2008, 07:31:16 PM »
As for which one is a "better" copy of the source - No idea what the original recordings sounded like, though I suppose I could run out and buy them for the purpose of the test.   ;D

They're good source albums to have, especially in SACD/DVD-A!

Thanks for the comments all (and the suggestion to move the topic to the recording gear forum). I'll wait a little longer before posting the key. But, if you are dying to know, send me a PM.



Offline intpseeker

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 813
  • Gender: Male
  • In music the passions enjoy themselves
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2008, 07:41:50 PM »
I like 'em both and have a hard time hearing a difference.
Mics:        Akg 451 eb A51's, ck-1's, ck-2's, ck 8's
                Peluso CEMC6 MK2, MK4, MK21, MK41
                AKG 391
                CA-11 cards and omnis
Pre:          ST-9100
Cables:     XTC Silvers, DT47-12's
Recorders: ACM PMD660
                 Busman modded R-4
                 PCM-M10
                 DR-70D
                 Church modded R-09 micsketeer
“One good thing about music, when it hits- you feel no pain” - Bob Marley

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15750
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: [DD] ADC Comparison - Edirol R-09 & R-09HR
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2008, 12:19:17 AM »
In the end, I like B.

Stream of thought.. immediately noticed the string attack on track 2. Much sharper. Too much? 'A' sounds good too.  In a way that I don't take notice of the top.  Maybe that'll be better, long term.. start preferring 'A'..  remember that I had the treble boosted +1db on the amp for adjusted playback of the acoustic stuff I recorded yesterday (on an R-09).. reset flat. Prefer B, repeat the ordeal with track 1. Like 'B' on both tracks now, but most obvious on 2. Notice it in the top, mostly.

I'll guess B is HR, but if it's not I'm even happier I have what I have.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 42 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF