Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's  (Read 6303 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« on: September 02, 2009, 01:32:56 PM »
has any run a comparison with 140's using oade's 148 vs. a V3.  I have been running a 148 since 2001 and am thinking of getting a V3, but am wondering others opinions of the set-up
thx
BP
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2009, 01:36:58 PM »
Depends in part on the ADC used.  What ADC do you use today with the M148?  Are you considering using the V3 purely as a preamp, and maintaining your current ADC?  Or are you considering replacing both your M148 + ADC with the V3 as both preamp and ADC?

Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2009, 01:47:24 PM »
just purchased apogee mme, have been going directly into PMD671.  I will use V3 for pre only
bp
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

Offline thekittycatt

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 874
  • Gender: Male
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2009, 01:52:46 PM »
I will use V3 for pre only
bp

Have you thought about a V2?

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2009, 02:03:04 PM »
tell me more???
no i have not,  i have just started playing with the idea of switching from the 148
bp
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2009, 02:12:15 PM »
My standard spiel:  Before changing gear, I personally find it important to consider the sonic characteristics I do and do not like in my current gear, then seek out new gear that preserves the sonic characteristics I prefer while (hopefully) improving (or removing) those I do not.

Is there anything particular about the sound you're achieving with 140s > M148 > MiniMe that you do or do not like?  That you do not hear but would like to hear?
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline thekittycatt

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 874
  • Gender: Male
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2009, 02:24:44 PM »
tell me more???
no i have not,  i have just started playing with the idea of switching from the 148
bp

V2 is a pre only.  It does not have the ADC like the V3.  The V2 is about $200-300 cheaper used.  The V3 has better meters lights for checking your levels.  Some think the V2 pre sounds better.  Some think the V3 pre sounds better.  Some think they sound the same.  It you want to come to Colorado, we can do some testing.

edit:  I have 140's, a V2 and, aV3
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 02:40:53 PM by thekittycatt »

Offline nedstruzz

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1409
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2009, 02:39:16 PM »
I used to run 140's>V2 and was always happy with the results.  Never ran a 148 so can't comment.
B&K 4023's >Neve Portico>744T

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2009, 03:06:49 PM »
I have a V2 I'm considering selling if you're interested: http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,123847.0.html
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2009, 04:35:01 PM »
good advice,
the MME should be here tomorrow, so I want to run the km140>m148>mme>pmd671 for a couple of shows. Get a feel for up close vs. further back then I can answer the question posted about what am I missing and/or what do I not like.
still might pick up a  V2 or V3 to run comparisons if I find a killer deal
thx all
bp
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

Offline SmokinJoe

  • Trade Count: (63)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Gender: Male
  • "75 and sunny"... life is so much simpler.
    • uploads to archive.org
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2009, 04:37:31 PM »
Lynchie owned 140's, an m148, and a V3, at least for a while.  He probably has an opinion for you.
Mics: Schoeps MK4 & CMC5's / Gefell M200's & M210's / ADK-TL / DPA4061's
Pres: V3 / ST9100
Decks: Oade Concert Mod R4Pro / R09 / R05
Photo: Nikon D700's, 2.8 Zooms, and Zeiss primes
Playback: Raspberry Pi > Modi2 Uber > Magni2 > HD650

Offline thekittycatt

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 874
  • Gender: Male
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2009, 04:48:31 PM »
Lynchie owned 140's, an m148, and a V3, at least for a while.  He probably has an opinion for you.

I would get some off his recordings and compare which one you like.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2009, 06:34:31 AM »
I have run all of the above.

my ears prefer 140 > v2 or v3 > any old A/D converter (V3 esp.)
but km150>MME is SICK, using the stock preamps in the Apogee.

Offline Big Perm

  • Trade Count: (67)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Gender: Male
  • Rage, Rest, work a lot, Repeat
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2009, 09:43:51 AM »
What was the biggest difference you could hear when running v2 vs 148
thx
bp
Mics: Schoeps mk4v| mk41v | mk22 | mk8 & mk5 (m/s)
         Schoeps m222> nt222dc (x2)
         Schoeps cmc 1k (x2)
         Schoeps vst62iu (x2)
         Schoeps KCY 250/5 IG (x2) Schoeps KC 5g (x2)
         DPA 4015c
Pre’s: Sonosax SX-M2D2
         Aeta PSP-3
         E.A.A. PSP-2
Recorder: Sonosax sx-r4+, SD702, Sony m10

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: M148 vs. V3 w/ km140's
« Reply #14 on: September 04, 2009, 06:24:45 AM »
neumann > v2 was crystal clear and detailed.  nice low end (tight and fast), and that lovely neumann shimmer.
neumann > 148 (and this was with 140s), was a little thick sounding to me.  it just didn't compliment the sound of the neumanns.  I'm sure it would sound better w/the ak50 caps, or an ak40/20 M-S rig.

140>248 sounds good too.  I've got a shit load of stuff on the archive w/that combo.  check out some STS9 pulls from 2005 that I made w/this combo if you care to.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF